Maxim Litvinov sounds like the Keyser Soze of his realm, and just as good at eluding history thanks to the systematic minimization of Maxim's role. I will never use the noun "maxim" again as a conscious thumbing of the nose at this asshole. (I realize this is antisemitic, since he was arm of the Rothchild family; also, suggesting that that family remains super-powerful today, as you have done, is similarly drenched in unabashed Jew-hatred. Since all both of us are good for is posting antisemitic tropes online, I have submitted applications for employment on both our behalf to the Anti-Defamation League, which always has openings for folks like this.)
I first became aware of this from a book and documentary, "Harvest of Sorrow" from sometime in the 80s I think. I have been mystified since, that the NYTimes has and retains ANY cultural credibility.
Don’t know if you heard but there was movie made about Mr Jones recently. I was interested in watching it but was outvoted by the family. Being recent though can’t really expect it to be accurate or that good tbh though.
Thanks! It's the same one, but it really does encapsulate the junior/senior role between the royal family and the central bank owners, doesn't it? Charles looks like a petulant child getting a stern talking to.
Maxim Litvinov sounds like the Keyser Soze of his realm, and just as good at eluding history thanks to the systematic minimization of Maxim's role. I will never use the noun "maxim" again as a conscious thumbing of the nose at this asshole. (I realize this is antisemitic, since he was arm of the Rothchild family; also, suggesting that that family remains super-powerful today, as you have done, is similarly drenched in unabashed Jew-hatred. Since all both of us are good for is posting antisemitic tropes online, I have submitted applications for employment on both our behalf to the Anti-Defamation League, which always has openings for folks like this.)
Thanks for bringing this back to the top of mind.
I first became aware of this from a book and documentary, "Harvest of Sorrow" from sometime in the 80s I think. I have been mystified since, that the NYTimes has and retains ANY cultural credibility.
Don’t know if you heard but there was movie made about Mr Jones recently. I was interested in watching it but was outvoted by the family. Being recent though can’t really expect it to be accurate or that good tbh though.
Did not know this, will look for it, thank you.
If I remember correctly it’s called ‘Mr Jones’.
Here’s the Wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr_Jones_(2019_film)
And here’s the IMDb: https://m.imdb.com/title/tt6828390/
Excellent piece. Thank you.
I like your new(?) profile pic. I used it in a piece I published earlier today.
https://open.substack.com/pub/rationalspirituality/p/moralistic-therapeutic-deism?r=g6u5j&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Thanks! It's the same one, but it really does encapsulate the junior/senior role between the royal family and the central bank owners, doesn't it? Charles looks like a petulant child getting a stern talking to.
That's exactly what it looks like. But you don't pull on Superman's cape and you don't poke your finger in the Prince of Wales' chest.
Or needing permission before entering the Square Mile
The Old Grey 'merchant of death' Lady NY Times also praised Hitler. The mainstream media is and always has been a blood enemy of the people.