The sad skinsuiting of the environmental movement: turning a blind eye to the effects of unchecked world population growth due to obsession with egalitarianism (Part 2)

Neo-Malthusian overpopulation and the draining of world resources

Continued from Part 1….

Part 1 covered the unchecked, exploding population growth of Africa, whose rate of growth is not slowing nearly as much as globohomo’s ridiculous scientific modeling indicated. Being unable to feed itself, Africa is at risk of a mass starvation event if there is ever a decrease of foreign aid, especially agricultural aid to the continent, and there is and will continue to be a mass exodus from Africa into Europe, seeking better job opportunities and higher quality of life. As a follow up point, arguably the smartest man in the world,

Chris Langan

, pointed out recently that globohomo maximized its deadly mRNA COVID vaccinations among white populations as a weapon of war, whose population growth rate is already flat or declining, while leaving Africa untouched. Africa had the lowest COVID vaccination rate of any populated continent on earth:

This section will cover the massive decline of natural resources worldwide to support the consumption patterns of 8 billion people on earth, which is rapidly heading toward 10 billion or more.

---

The unsustainable consumption of worldwide natural resources

This could be something like a ten part series, doing a deep dive into the rates of use and known reserves for each category of consumption. However, a highlight of a bunch of categories should provide a similar visceral impact. Let’s go through them.

• Energy consumption per country serves as a proxy for general consumption. The more developed nations have much higher consumption rates than less developed, even though the population growth (as discussed in part 1) has been highest in Africa and (previously) Asia:

  

• Worldwide energy use is mostly based on oil, natural gas, coal, and traditional biofuels. Alternative energy including nuclear, wind, hydropower, solar and other renewables are tiny percentages of the world’s energy use despite all the media hype. This is because they are so inefficient, except for nuclear, which is efficient but scares the public; fourth generation nuclear reactors are much safer than prior generations, and thorium-based nuclear reactors would be even safer and more sustainable:

  

• World oil and gas production is depleting. Saudi and other countries are hiding their reserve figures as a “state secret”. Coal, oil and gas production are getting harder and more complex as world reserves dwindle - it requires deeper mines, deeper drilling, expensive fracking, and other difficult to master technologies. BP’s CEO stated in 2010 that he expected worldwide oil production to peak in 2020, and according to a study China was expected to peak in coal production in 2020 with the U.S. not far behind. In other words, peak production is now:

  

  Peak oil and gas per country

  

  Peak oil and gas per type. See here for more

  

  Peak coal production per region

• Meanwhile, nitrogen fertilizer which powers the Green Revolution and allow half the planet to eat is a direct fossil fuel product processed primarily from natural gas:

  

  M. King Hubbert's prediction of world petroleum production rates. Modern agriculture is largely reliant on petroleum energy.

  

  Half the world’s population relies on synthetic nitrogen fertilizer booster agricultural output in order to survive. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizer in turn relies on natural gas inputs

  According to Wikipedia, it is estimated that no more than 3.7 billion people could be fed without this single fossil fuel agricultural input. Moreover, the essential mineral nutrient phosphorus is often a limiting factor in crop cultivation, while phosphorus mines are rapidly being depleted worldwide.

• The UN’s FAO warns that 90% of Earth’s topsoil, the health of which is necessary for growing crops, is at risk by 2050:

  

  

  † Worthington et al. (from UK Soil Association Fact Sheet). Journal of Complementary Medicine 7:2161–2163 (2001).

• Overfishing is causing worldwide fish populations to crash:

National Geographic: “How overfishing threatens the world's oceans—and why it could end in catastrophe”:

National Geographic: The rise of industrial fishing has led to the harvesting of wildlife at rates too high for species to replace themselves. Today, over a third of global stocks are overfished, posing a threat to biodiversity and throwing ecosystems dangerously out of balance.

• Plastics, which are also derived from oil, are ubiquitous and increasing rapidly, because they are so cheap to manufacture despite how long they take to biodegrade (450-600 years) and how they leech into the food/water supply:

  

  Plastics production over time

  

  Plastic pollution produced per ton per country. China is by far the biggest contributor

  

  Ocean Trash: 5.25 Trillion Pieces and Counting. Also see the Great Pacific Garbage Patch

Microplastics have been found in human blood for the first time, with extremely negative health implications, especially to testosterone levels. Eating one fish from U.S. lakes or rivers is likened to drinking month's worth of contaminated water. And this is all expected to get much worse: Global plastics use is set to triple by 2060.

Plastics are very difficult to recycle despite being ubiquitous:

Environmental advocates maintain that plastics are largely single-use: A 2020 Greenpeace USA survey found that plastics with resin codes #3–7 are virtually impossible to recycle, because of limited facility processing capabilities and insufficient market demand. Lawsuits are currently ongoing against Walmart and Keurig Green Mountain, arguing that those companies have violated Federal Trade Commission guidance by presenting plastic items as recyclable. The corporate giants have defended themselves against the allegations and emphasized their commitment to sustainability. (Walmart said in a statement that the company is “a strong advocate for the environment” and recycling, while Keurig has maintained in court that its labels advise consumers to “check locally” regarding recycling options.)

Plastics are difficult to recycle

Think a how much plastics you use when you go to the grocery store. Here’s a representation:

How much trash does an average American family throw out in a week? See here for article and more photos

How do you think you and your family’s compares? Pretty much any family in America has similar waste habits.

• The rates of animal extinction are at record highs and accelerating:

  

  See here for a list of recently extinct mammals. This isn’t taking into account humanity’s driving of many species to near extinction, such as what happened to the American buffalo, which is an especially disgusting story.

• The industrialized food system is a complete horror show. The animals that aren’t at risk of going extinct are those that humans raise for consumption such as cows, pigs and chickens. 29 billion animals killed for food in the US alone in 2023 so far: here is more information on the numbers. But their lives are horrifically bad in the modern industrialized meat production system which breeds for economic efficiency; short, brutish lives, and in the dark and in pain, yanked from their mother’s embrace either at birth or close to birth. (This is a natural dilemma: our bodies are tuned to meat eating because of hundreds of thousands or millions of years of evolution as hunter gatherers, but we have no connection to the food we eat anymore.)

  How can one claim this planet is anything but a horror show nightmare based on this? (As a side note, note that the proclaimed worst group on earth in history, the Nazis, wanted to ban this kind of industrialized meat slaughter).

• Deforestation: Over the decade since 2010, the net loss in forests globally was 4.7 million hectares per year. However, deforestation rates were much significantly higher. The UN FAO estimate that 10 million hectares of forest were cut down each year.

  

• Air quality: Air quality in major cities worldwide, where a disproportionate amount of the world’s population live, have terrible air quality:

  

  According to the WHO 92% of the world’s population live in places where air pollution levels exceed healthy safety limits.

  Let’s also not forget about controversial chemical trails (“chemtrails”), which spray unknown poisons into the air we breathe for dubious reasons (weather modification? To make people sicker? As an experiment?). The media won’t cover it, of course… You can see the below in pretty much any well populated city in America, all you have to do is look up, but of course looking up and believing your own eyes is a “dangerous conspiracy theory that only dumb hicks believe”:

  

• Water quality: Urban water supplies are highly compromised, with chemicals in water supply such as estrogen, birth control chemicals, fluoride etc. Drinkable water supplies are also being strained due to massively growing populations:

  

This article by

Karen Hunt aka KH Mezek

is a nice primer on who controls the limited resource of drinkable water.

---

The elite response to the decline of worldwide natural resources

As mentioned at the start of this essay, the elite response to the decline of worldwide natural resources is to attempt to institute neoliberal feudalism, where the consumption rates of almost everyone worldwide, except for the elites, shall be dramatically curtailed. They have to do this, under whatever false branding/ marketing it takes, whether it is “global warming” (as per

William M Briggs

) or “climate change” or something else, because the alternative is catastrophe as resources run out with 10+ billion people demanding to be fed and provided a decent quality of life. Bringing online massive numbers of safer fourth generation nuclear reactors worldwide to provide energy could (and should) help with this problem, but would not solve it. Perhaps a much greater focus on thorium nuclear reactors could…

Regardless, these elites don’t want clean, safe, ubiquitous nuclear energy, because that doesn’t create a grift that allows them to separate themselves from the unwashed masses. They are and will continue to institute neoliberal feudalism as their preferred solution via massive inflation, the institution of freedom-killing CBDCs, ubiquitous woke AI, higher taxes and dramatically increased immigration, along with retarded, wildly inefficient “green” solutions such as solar and wind energies. Then they will slowly kill off the excess population, who Klaus Schwab advisor Yuval Harari (a Jewish homosexual atheist) calls “useless eaters”, with poisoned food and water, mRNA death jabs, war and other measures.

These extreme measures would not have been needed if we had an elite worth their salt. A proper elite, an elite based in noblesse oblige instead of noblesse malice, an elite not blinded by an extreme form of secular-but-religious based egalitarianism, would have come up with a plan on the front end when world populations were 20-25% of what they are now instead of the back end with a world population spiraling toward an unsustainable 10+ billion. Such a plan could have looked like this:

Combining a low, homogenous population (likely enforced with maximum number of children by the government, sorry libertarians), an emphasis on rural and farming communities instead of cities, with a local and national focus instead of global, a sustainable society with a high degree of recycling, environmentally conscious, not economic growth dominated, with precautionary principles for letting new chemicals into the environment and food supply, and a focus on clean, sustainable nuclear energy.

Malthus thought that the best option for humanity would be to consciously stay (well) below the Malthusian limiting factor(s) to growth instead of reaching those limits which always greatly expand human misery:

In later editions of his essay, Malthus clarified his view that if society relied on human misery to limit population growth, then sources of misery (e.g., hunger, disease, and war) would inevitably afflict society, as would volatile economic cycles. On the other hand, "preventive checks" to population that limited birthrates, such as later marriages, could ensure a higher standard of living for all, while also increasing economic stability. Regarding possibilities for freeing man from these limits, Malthus argued against a variety of imaginable solutions, such as the notion that agricultural improvements could expand without limit.

Herrnstein and Murray agree with Malthus in the policy recommendations they offered in The Bell Curve:

Discussing a possible future political outcome of an intellectually stratified society, the authors stated that they "fear that a new kind of conservatism is becoming the dominant ideology of the affluent—not in the social tradition of an Edmund Burke or in the economic tradition of an Adam Smith but 'conservatism' along Latin American lines, where to be conservative has often meant doing whatever is necessary to preserve the mansions on the hills from the menace of the slums below." Moreover, they fear that increasing welfare will create a "custodial state" in "a high-tech and more lavish version of the Indian reservation for some substantial minority of the nation's population." They also predict increasing totalitarianism: "It is difficult to imagine the United States preserving its heritage of individualism, equal rights before the law, free people running their own lives, once it is accepted that a significant part of the population must be made permanent wards of the states."

The authors recommended the elimination of welfare policies which they claim encourage poor women to have babies.

Our world elites have made a deal with the Devil. In return for unlimited control they have promised to do whatever it takes, no matter the moral, spiritual, physical or ethical lapses involved. Control above all, “imperium super omnia” is the motto that motivates them.

Marina Abramović poses with Jacob Rothschild in front of 'Satan summoning his Legions', 1796-1797

They are reckless, blind, arrogant and bloodthirsty - a very nasty combination. First they had to crush any attempts of rebellion and inegalitarianism from the masses, which led to the massive unchecked population explosion and the situation we are in today. And that’s why they are scrambling to address it on the back-end, a horrific upcoming process which will result in unimaginable misery for most of the world, instead of being able to do so responsibly and ethically on the front-end.

But here’s the thing about the Devil: he doesn’t keep his word. If our globohomo bloodthirsty elites “succeed” in destroying the world and bringing the masses to ruin, the Devil will ultimately betray his followers and send them along the same path that they previously sent everyone else.

Ultimately, the world is currently barreling toward the Wall-E scenario, where we consume everything and leave behind a dead husk of a planet in a mass worldwide die-off; the Sixth (and last?) Mass Extinction Event (unless we become multi-planetary so we can find and devour resources of other planets). At the very least upcoming increased competition for scarcer resources will lead to dramatically lower quality of living for almost everyone. A horrible and grim future.

Humanity, a swarm of locusts blindly devouring everything in sight, must become multi-planetary based on horrific current trends or risk extinction. Pictured is a SpaceX reusable Falcon 9 second stage

Wall-E’s vision of planet earth as a fully consumed desolate wasteland is the likely future for humanity unless collapse or becoming multi-planetary happens first.