The heart of the matter is that there are two groups of Jewish oligarchs fighting over the control of Donbass. One group based loosely in Ukraine and the US and another group based in Russia and Israel. Biden Nuland Jews are on the Ukraine side , Trump's Jews are on the Russian side. All the other aspects of the war are mere reactions to that fact.
Sadly, everything you said is correct concerning the bankster-cabal playing all sides of each bloody conflict, with the diabolic Demiurge lurking behind and working through them. It's more obvious in Ukraine, given the extremes of life and death on display there, but everything happening in Ukraine is of a piece with what's happening everywhere else in the world. The empire practices its psyops and tyranny on its foreign satrapies, before bringing those tactics home and deploying them on its own population. (So get ready Israelis and Americans!)
Thanks for the article. If Putin really is 100% Cabal controlled I think we need a new type of pill to describe the reality we find ourselves in - perhaps cyanide-pilled (but they'd probably be blue!).
I try to keep an open mind, not because this abyss stares back too hard, but because selling out Russia to globalists surely doesn't need to be this complicated - as Gorbachev demonstrated so well. Yes Putin is allowing all manner of disturbing stuff to go on domestically - Riley sets this out very well. And yes, maybe the Chabad have their hooks into him as Rolo believes. But why go to all the trouble of re-arming Russia will all manner of sophisticated weaponry and immunizing the country against sanctions just to surrender it? And if Putin is controlled are Lavrov, Zakharova and the likes of Elena Panina and other highly intelligent patriotic pundits who surely ought to see & report the treachery (or be disappeared)?
If Putin really is an actor he will surely go down in history as the greatest con artist of all time in selling out Russia while pretending to be a Russian patriot for a quarter of a century. My suspicion is the truth is more complicated. As for the war, it ain't a stalemate just because the front lines aren't moving. Russia has depleted and degraded the Ukrainian army to such an extent that analysts on both sides now expect the collapse to start soon. Wars of attrition are won, as Hemingway put it; "gradually, then suddenly". I also think many black-pillers are not applying Hanlon's razor to the conflict. Russia had an army poorly prepared for war with NATO - albeit via a proxy - and as she did in the GPW it's taken a couple of years to get her sh*t together. The fortunes of war include to and fro - even the ones not controlled by bankers.
Thanks John. The pill of the reality you describe is the gnostic pill - that this reality is controlled by a malevolent Demiurge who enjoys torturing humanity for whatever reason, and the God of light and justice is either absent from the material plane or weaker than this Demiurge in this realm. Under this conception the idea is to develop gnosis (knowledge) of this setup in order to hopefully ascend from it spiritually either in this world or the next.
To try to answer your question, our rulers seem to be positioning the world for a transition from a unipolar to a multi-polar world. You can see this when globohomo rigged the Brazilian election against Bolsonaro and then had Lula immediately announce he would de-dollarize, or evil fiends like Alex Soros publicly brag about looking forward to the U.S. falling a decade ago: https://www.instagram.com/p/BEwgmuxKccI/ The head of Russia's central bank, Elvira Nabiullina, a pro-West globohomo lackey, sent $300-400 billion into the West to get seized at the start of the SMO and Putin renominated her for the position...the list goes on and on. Because this conspiracy is worldwide (as we also saw during COVID when world authorities were in lockstep, including in Russia, China, Iran, etc) they are not dependent on a strong, healthy unipolar United States for their continued rule...
But hey, you could be right and maybe Ukraine's collapse is just around the corner. We are all reading tea leaves from the outside; it's possible, although it's hard to imagine that Russia ends up with a good deal more of East Ukraine at this point. The proof is ultimately in the pudding; a theory that is contradicted by future events should be updated in light of those events. If my theories are wrong I'll try to update my worldview in light of that. Unfortunately I've found so far through trial and error that the black-pilled take is usually the right one. But we all must find and have hope somewhere in order to survive...
Demiurge torturing humanity for whatever reason? World leaders acting against their own interests? As a TI and contactee this report resonates in suggesting that "the program" is "trauma based personality change" and that the MO hasn't changed in hundreds of years despite tech advancements.
Wasn't Putin a WEF younger leader of tomorrow, or whatever the title is? He seems to have tried every possible route to integrate with the west. Going full steam ahead with domestic surveillance/WHO integration/CDBC, at a much faster pace then the West.
Its interesting that Yevgeny Prigozhin/Wagner Group have disappeared down the memory hole so quickly. I still don't understand their rebellion. Seems that they were used for the heavy fighting, with the local militias and then thrown under the bus.
It's Biblical. All the prophecies fulfilled so far have predicted our current situation and provide a vision of what is to come. It's going to get a whole lot worse before it gets good.
I agree with your "ulterior objectives" one through six and "part" of seven. There's definitely a campaign by ruling elites to obliterate populism. In any event, whether it's a scamdemic or a "not war" the "expendables" or what Hillary deemed "deplorables" are always powerless.
Remember, Cheney and Clinton each had five deferments. And we all know about George Bush and his dubious career in the Texas National Guard. 😁
So to put it simply, psychopathic rulers don't give a damn about the human cost of war as long as it's economically profitable and provides a way to continue an agenda which heightens the power of World Governance.
Ukraine and Palestine will share a similar fate as their terroritories and resources are carved up like a juicy carcass for asset management firms to devour.
In the process a remaining, but very limited population will be experimental cannon-fodder for the developing biosecurity surveillance state which will make Stalinism look like a democracy.
The palpable sense of degeneracy, parasitism and regressive stupidity that characterizes the world stage defies any rational attempt to describe or even characterize. The current orchestration of events, and the obvious direction taken is so utterly alien to any sense of normalcy, that standard comparisons are simply inadequate.
In a very real sense, this disclosure of disaster cannot be dealt with by standard human modes of thought. Here we aren't merely discussing asymmetrical, deceptive, or duplicitous tactics, but a sneering, egomaniacal derision that typifies all top down relations, intensifying since the inception of the Covid plan.
People sense a clear and active evil, and the upper classes oblige through fulfilling that role.
What I find particularly interesting is the question as to why the ruling class is still alive. In nature, those who live in social groups only support leaders that support them, a circumstance which has long since departed the human sphere.
There is nothing at all in the way of leadership, to the image of a diaper wearing dolt as one's president, or a smirking lecturer quoting heavily redacted history, much less a Jewish homosexual posing for photo-ops. From a certain point of view these third rate wannabes are selected as an active mockery of the citizenry they rape and pillage, rather than represent.
I have my own explanation for all of this, my own views and vision, yet I cannot help but wonder how long it will take mankind to realize the state, and then do something about it.
In closing I would point out that to mystics, and Gnosticism is first and foremost mysticism-the Demiurge is not truly evil. Like all in manifestation, the Demiurge is beset by incompleteness, and since that incompleteness derives from ignorance, there is a sense of innocence that the evil of the ruling class cannot claim.
In short the Demiurge can be redeemed, for the depth of evil is not a recurring choice, but a result of a lack, a deficiency. Yet an active, knowing choice carries an entirely different set of circumstances, and penalties. The ancient masters were very careful in their descriptions of roots and causes, and we should be as well.
Thanks for this, Mike. If you don't believe our overlords are animated by the Demiurge, even though I think you profess gnostic beliefs, who do you believe they are animated by? Do you see a Devil figure in addition to a Demiurge, or something else?
Certainly the temptation is to award to the top dogs some type of spiritual authority. Such an explanation both greatly simplifies the image of the world and explains why it is so. Part of us longs for the dualistic cosmos of Descarte, if for no other reason than the fact that such is actually understandible.
However, I have never actually discovered a spiritual support for the top dogs. Rather, I have discovered a spiritual interference aimed at anyone who actively opposes the plan of power for powers sake.
This might seem like a spurious distinction, but it is the difference between faith and knowledge.
Therefore, the knowingly done evil of the top dogs might be participated in by certain spiritual forces, but said evil is not administered by such forces. In other words the choice to behave according to evil is the evil doers alone.
Those spiritual forces integrated into this entire society are by nature tied to what we refer to as the material world, and it is definitely true of the top dogs that any spiritual force they recognize must have a visible signature.
Any mystic worth their salt will tell you that a higher order than the physical exists, thus any force that is involved in the materium is also of a lower order. Therefore one can at least entertain a perspective whereby those who sit atop society are not steered by mighty forces, rather by extremely petty ones.
Perhaps this stirs a sense of the pathetic in their actions, because the scope of such action is quite small. Thusly said, the role of the Demiurge is one of returning to soundness of mind through the anagogic power within the cosmos and himself-a power which lies latent, but is very real. Perhaps my perspective is too limited, yet I have seen exactly nothing from the top dogs to so much as suggest that there even is an awareness that a path to wholeness is available to them.
In conclusion, the top dogs do not claim to any great spiritual authority. Their sphere of influence does not reach beyond this material existence, nor does it offer anything beyond it. Such abandonment is what powers their moral turpitude, that they cannot imagine anything more, and so they aspire to less.
So much more could be said, but I think this should be enough to chew on.
I do believe that separation alone is not the core principle, rather its the nature of that separation. For example, there is a certain kind of separation whereby one can forge an individual competency, through relying on principles and perspectives that have the ring of truth. We used to do this all the time, actually. It was second nature.
I confess that I lack sufficient interest to spend much more time on elite separation. I have verified for myself that their separation stems from a vapid certainty that spirituality doesn't exist, so they find nothing to be separated from.
What those who long for spirituality can, and should do is cultivate their connexion wherever and however they find it. A genuine link always carries with it a sense of wonder. This must always be flexible and a living experience. It can be very simple, as simple as the silence. In this way one will never fall victim to the abandonment of the elite, and so those subtle inner qualities will step into the value they are due.
I think you're putting too much.... trust, in the player's ability to cooperate though.
For instance, historically as empires break down, those with power start to grab it. We see this in the states. I've started referring to Abbot as Duke Abbot to shift narrative, but also because I believe that it is beginning to resemble the truth of the matter. As the states have, for years now, ignored federal law (with the blessing of the feds, no less!) on several issues, they become their own little fiefdoms.
And so, we see the American Empire begin to break at the seems even on the continent, let alone across the sea.
As far as the globohomo?
Maybe Putin wanted to be a player at one point. Maybe. Or maybe he was keeping his country's options open.
As far as I can tell, the long war in Ukraine is because he was, at the start, worried about having to fight all of NATO at once if he overextended. Plus, with them shipping off weapons systems and munitions, he got to grind down both the industrial base and financial base of the West. He's not playing just a physical war, he's also playing a financial and industrial war, and showing the world that Russian weapons systems can hold their own against the West's, at a much lower cost.
For instance, our artillery munitions cost about 5k to their 500, and their ability to pump them out is orders of magnitude higher. Its the same with all our weapons systems.
Our t-bill issuance is in shambles, and our debt ceiling is a nightmare, with 1/3 of our budget going to entitlement, of which a lot gets eaten up by immigrants who hate us. And we can't issue more t-bills, because we've weaponized the dollar so aggressively that no one wants it, the pensions and banks have too many, and it's all a mess.
So.... Yeah. He may be what you say. Or he may be playing a long game. I just think it suits him better to wear down the wests industrial base, not win a war too quickly, be loaded with a bunch of 'lets rebuild Ukraine' costs, and hand the problem back off to us after dividing Ukraine back up in thirds between Russia, Poland, and a rump state left to Kiev.
Hi Barbarian, I think the Abbott Texas stuff is all part of the globohomo game. The media "controversy" has been over a tiny stretch of the Texas border while the rest of it remains wide open. See here for more: https://thegoodcitizen.live/p/the-civil-war-psyop . I think Ken Paxton is much "realer" than Abbott is or has been.
Thanks for the reply and sharing those two posts. They're good food for thought.
I don't disagree that the Texas thing -may- be a song and dance. I think it's a dangerous one for globohomo, because it really does have the danger of turning into Duke Abbot, Lord of Texas. There's tons of historical precedent, and more and more legal and real precedent that we're making daily here in the US for governors to just flout US law and do whatever they want. It could be CIA, it could be anything, and then it could suddenly be Duke Abbot with an army at his back.
I'll just keep calling him Duke Abbot, because I truly think it's going that direction, no matter what the (un)official plan is.
As far as the second link, I believe that many of his questions can be answered by Putin not wanting a quick or easy war once he didn't immediately seize Kiev. After that, it became something to worry about NATO stepping in on other fronts (so holding back the elite troops and weapons) while grinding down the industrial, economic, and manpower of the west. We're funding, supplying, and giving them both intel and manpower over there (sorry, but if we give them money and they hire our 'fired' soldiers with generals as advisers and using our intel, I consider that really us fighting directly in reality with a fig leaf). Putin accepts the fig leaf because it suits him for whatever reason.
Maybe because it's as you say. I doubt it, because he has more power to gain -not- being a part of globohomo than in being a part of it. And I think it's clear to the world globohomo is falling apart at the seams.
So yeah, I can see answers to those questions. They just aren't the, "let's win the battle before us." answer, but, "Lets survive as a nation" answer. If that makes sense.
The Texas thing -is- a song and dance currently, that I think will fall apart as the country does. I think it will give Abbot a taste for power that he will enjoy and that he will drink deeply of the cup that has been passed to him.
That's why I don't really think it matters if it's a song or dance. The empire is breaking apart, and I think the Duke of Texas will rise.
I thought Rolo wrote this piece (reading it in my email box) but it had red lights from the beginning. And until I got to Julian Assange. :) Rolo will never post Julian Assange you know, so I thought definitely not right and not Rolo. Great, great article, thank you both.
People (Western audiences) tend to get big mad when Strelkov is brought up. I would imagine he has thousands and thousands of people who are thinking what’s happened to him is like making them fight with one arm tied behind their backs.
They strung him and the nationalists along as long as they could be used as cannon fodder. When it became too obvious over time what they were doing, i.e. a goal of stalemate and mass casualties with head-on frontal assaults into heavily fortified positions, well, Igor, into the slammer you and your ilk go...
Thank you for sharing that. I know next to nothing about this situation other than that this person was thrown in jail for criticising this war, which is hemorrhaging that part of the world to say the least. He was also accused of shooting down that airliner, which I absolutely doubt.
Right on, he exposed the phony war and told the truth, shattering the illusion and the fake narrative. That the Russian people are dying for olicharchs and jewish games instead of for their country. Obviously this couldnt stand so they threw him into the gulag on trumped up charges for 4 years. Which tells you this fake war will atleast go on for another 4 years or so.
I'm a little surprised that you concur with the 'stalemate' analysis of the Ukraine conflict. The Russians might not be taking much territory but they are killing huge numbers of Ukrainian conscripts, which can't go on forever. I say that as someone who lives in Central Europe and really does not want to get conscripted to go and fight in Ukraine, but some of the more swivel-eyed politicos seem to be priming populations for just that.
No argument with your point about the goal being an endless war, though.
This happened in Vietnam too (which I also see as controlled, btw) -- when the situation got (intentionally) bogged down the U.S. authorities switched to counting bodies as a proxy for victory. But if you step back and consider that (1) Ukraine as a whole was under Russian proxy control as recently as 2014, (2) the entire east half of Ukraine more-or-less was neutral-to-friendly to Russia at the start of the SMO, and that (3) Russia went from hoping for a quick decapitation strike against Kiev to getting bogged down in a morass so thick they apparently can't even conquer the rest of the Donbass, it's easy to see how the field of vision to victory has shrunk and shrunk and shrunk, even as Ukraine is being emptied out...
Even so, it does not matter who will win in Ukraine, the factories,land and resources there will fall under olicharch group 1 or group 2. If you think the local people there will benefits you probably believe in the toothferry too. Vietnam was the same phony war we now see in Ukraine except the roles were reversed and Russia was using Vietnam as a proxy against the US. The US used Vietnam as a testing ground tho, experimenting with new weapons,bombs and bioligical warfare like agent orange. Still the US casualties were quite low considering they have been there for a decade. This war in Ukraine is a war on steriods if you look at the casualties almost reaching ww1/ww2 levels.
"It’s a good Rorschach test - if a writer takes this interview at face value he doesn’t understand the subtext."
I see the "dissident" Right news-talkers all got their talking points memo: Putin's droning monologue about "You see, it all started with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in 1512..." was an attempt to paralyze listeners with boredom, while not addressing the immediate and actionable causes, but the "wise guys" on the Right interpret it as a 5D history lesson that proves Putin is superior to any of our midwit (and lower) politicians, and anyone who thinks otherwise is just a "typical bourgeois American ignorant of history." IOW, criticism of Putin becomes a chance to mock the rubes that make up their audience. Putin mocks us, and our "dissidents" mock us as well. Talk about "controlled opposition."
It would have been great if Tucker had interrupted him with "History is bunk." I mean, of course, droning recitations of historical and/or mythical grievances, as opposed to grasping the Big Picture, as in your post here.
Good comment, James. It is *not enough* to be reflexively against whatever it is that globohomo purports to be in favor of (or its opposite), as that can also be a trap. Being reactively pro-Putin because globohomo purportedly "hates" him is falling into that trap.
Reaction is weakness. Only a proactive vision that one can use as one's North Star can avoid the pitfalls of action-reaction-sythesis that globohomo is so famous for.
Thanks for the link, James. I read Tracey occasionally a number of years ago where he offered some fair commentary on Trump but nothing recently. It's a good post for deflating the bubble that some among the far-right have created for Putin and it's comments about the Tucker interview were strong, although there were other points he made that I didn't quite agree with him on (an apparent argument for the eternal concreteness of existing national borders versus self-determination, the moral stances to the start of the war, etc -- positions he would perhaps have to take in order to retain any influence in the media, among the establishment, or maybe even his followers).
I don't think putin is anti LGBTQ/HOMO at all, he simply cannot support it because of the large amount of muslims and conservative minorities living in Russia. He would risk civil war if he supports it.
Fascinating analysis, and you might well be right on all of it. One thing I would say from my layman's perspective, is that perhaps politicians/leaders like Vladimir Putin and the other global players are all to some extent restrained and/or controlled by external parties - the cabal, if you will - but that the level of this control might wax and wane over the months, years and decades; and will to some degree be subject to modification and re-negotiation ad hoc. That is to say that it doesn't necessarily happen that "Leader A" has the same idea as "the cabal" or "Leader B" at any given point in geopolitical developments, of what is in his or his region's short-to-medium-term interests. Especially when we are dealing with conflicts on a battlefield, as being able to completely orchestrate events would seem to be (on the face of things) subject to errors and misjudgments which could have very unpredictable outcomes in the political and media space. Iain Davis expands on this very eloquently in his post from February. It might be of interest to some readers :
Thanks Renewable. Yes, that's a great link by Iain Davis and I actually have a future post ready to go about it. The key part of it is, imo: "Agreement on the pillars does not suggest all national governments are of one, single hive mind. It suggests that governments do not control the global governance system. They are subject to it, just like the rest of us. The best they can achieve is "partner" status. And they are not senior partners."
Indeed. That is the thrust of the piece, or at least my broad take on it as I recall. Although I didn't necessarily completely agree on all the points raised, as would be expected. I will look forward to your contribution on this worldview !
What they do in Ukraine, they will eventually do here (or everywhere). Why? To "keep us safe," that's why.
Surrender your freedom(s) for safety. It's always the same lies, over and over.
I think that the biggest secret in all of this is that people would most likely get along quite well, without all of the contrived situations that lead to war. Sure there would still be wars, but they would make sense, and they wouldn't operate on a schedule.
Another anecdotal way that people can see how these wars and conflicts are contrived; someone is always making money! There's no war where someone isn't getting rich. Who are these people who have the ability to hold on to their capital -- until just the right war comes along? Nothing works that way, unless you KNOW when and where the wars are going to break out.
We're in for seriously hard road from here on out. They [the evil pukes pulling the strings] are getting set up to push the most restrictive control mechanisms at their disposal.
Everything comes down to regular people's ability to keep enough resources available outside of the current or new system. That way people can either fight back, or at least survive outside of the new WEF/Davos global slavery system.
I agree with your original summation and the update with one minor nitpick. It seems to me that Putin is using the Orthodox Church as an additional branch of government to control the masses. Other variations of Christianity are harassed or worse, but this one is allowed because it's under his thumb. I haven't seen any indication of its demise. Correct me if i am wrong here.
I love the GP3 chart. I first learned of it from Mark Moss, who teaches about economics and such on Odysee (also YT but i don't visit there anymore).
The best thing for White Europeans around the world would have been for this war to have been avoided by a treaty along the lines of the treaty that neutralized Austria in the mid-1950s.
Putin proposed such a treaty. The US and Ukraine rejected it. Biden said the US would never put soldiers in Ukraine and that Ukraine would not be admitted to NATO but he said the US wouldn't put this in writing.
Putin would have had to be mentally retarded to have bought this after NATO's cynical gimmick in the Minsk Accords.
So, the USA got the war it wanted and had been working for since the USA overthrew the Ukrainian government in 2014 for the express reason that that government wanted amicable relations with Russia.
The next best thing would have been for Russia to have won a quick victory.
The longer the war goes on, the more deeply hatred is implanted between the Ukrainian and Russian people.
Our Deep State revels in family quarrels among European peoples. The longer the war goes on, the happier the "American" government is and the worse for all decent White European people both in Europe and around the world....including the pathetically conned and misruled White Europeans in the USA.
Yes, Putin seems to love his "They keep fooling me!" shtick. "They fooled me when they promised they would keep NATO out of Eastern Europe!" "They fooled me with the Maidan Revolution!" "They fooled me at Minsk 1!" "They fooled me at Minsk 2!" "They fooled me when we almost signed an early peace treaty with Zelensky until Meanie Boris Johnson nixed it!" He kind of likes being called incompetent, I guess -- but if you take the next step and accuse his actions as being intentional, you end up like Strelkov...
Playing on hatred and differences between European nations has been British foreign policy for centuries, the US simply continue using the same strategy when the UK was bankrupted during ww1 and ww2 and passed the torch over to America.
The heart of the matter is that there are two groups of Jewish oligarchs fighting over the control of Donbass. One group based loosely in Ukraine and the US and another group based in Russia and Israel. Biden Nuland Jews are on the Ukraine side , Trump's Jews are on the Russian side. All the other aspects of the war are mere reactions to that fact.
Sadly, everything you said is correct concerning the bankster-cabal playing all sides of each bloody conflict, with the diabolic Demiurge lurking behind and working through them. It's more obvious in Ukraine, given the extremes of life and death on display there, but everything happening in Ukraine is of a piece with what's happening everywhere else in the world. The empire practices its psyops and tyranny on its foreign satrapies, before bringing those tactics home and deploying them on its own population. (So get ready Israelis and Americans!)
Thanks for the article. If Putin really is 100% Cabal controlled I think we need a new type of pill to describe the reality we find ourselves in - perhaps cyanide-pilled (but they'd probably be blue!).
I try to keep an open mind, not because this abyss stares back too hard, but because selling out Russia to globalists surely doesn't need to be this complicated - as Gorbachev demonstrated so well. Yes Putin is allowing all manner of disturbing stuff to go on domestically - Riley sets this out very well. And yes, maybe the Chabad have their hooks into him as Rolo believes. But why go to all the trouble of re-arming Russia will all manner of sophisticated weaponry and immunizing the country against sanctions just to surrender it? And if Putin is controlled are Lavrov, Zakharova and the likes of Elena Panina and other highly intelligent patriotic pundits who surely ought to see & report the treachery (or be disappeared)?
If Putin really is an actor he will surely go down in history as the greatest con artist of all time in selling out Russia while pretending to be a Russian patriot for a quarter of a century. My suspicion is the truth is more complicated. As for the war, it ain't a stalemate just because the front lines aren't moving. Russia has depleted and degraded the Ukrainian army to such an extent that analysts on both sides now expect the collapse to start soon. Wars of attrition are won, as Hemingway put it; "gradually, then suddenly". I also think many black-pillers are not applying Hanlon's razor to the conflict. Russia had an army poorly prepared for war with NATO - albeit via a proxy - and as she did in the GPW it's taken a couple of years to get her sh*t together. The fortunes of war include to and fro - even the ones not controlled by bankers.
Keeping my pills dark red for the time being.
Thanks John. The pill of the reality you describe is the gnostic pill - that this reality is controlled by a malevolent Demiurge who enjoys torturing humanity for whatever reason, and the God of light and justice is either absent from the material plane or weaker than this Demiurge in this realm. Under this conception the idea is to develop gnosis (knowledge) of this setup in order to hopefully ascend from it spiritually either in this world or the next.
To try to answer your question, our rulers seem to be positioning the world for a transition from a unipolar to a multi-polar world. You can see this when globohomo rigged the Brazilian election against Bolsonaro and then had Lula immediately announce he would de-dollarize, or evil fiends like Alex Soros publicly brag about looking forward to the U.S. falling a decade ago: https://www.instagram.com/p/BEwgmuxKccI/ The head of Russia's central bank, Elvira Nabiullina, a pro-West globohomo lackey, sent $300-400 billion into the West to get seized at the start of the SMO and Putin renominated her for the position...the list goes on and on. Because this conspiracy is worldwide (as we also saw during COVID when world authorities were in lockstep, including in Russia, China, Iran, etc) they are not dependent on a strong, healthy unipolar United States for their continued rule...
But hey, you could be right and maybe Ukraine's collapse is just around the corner. We are all reading tea leaves from the outside; it's possible, although it's hard to imagine that Russia ends up with a good deal more of East Ukraine at this point. The proof is ultimately in the pudding; a theory that is contradicted by future events should be updated in light of those events. If my theories are wrong I'll try to update my worldview in light of that. Unfortunately I've found so far through trial and error that the black-pilled take is usually the right one. But we all must find and have hope somewhere in order to survive...
Demiurge torturing humanity for whatever reason? World leaders acting against their own interests? As a TI and contactee this report resonates in suggesting that "the program" is "trauma based personality change" and that the MO hasn't changed in hundreds of years despite tech advancements.
https://www.patreon.com/posts/report-3-goals-85056137
Why are world leaders racing to roll out compliance tests, digital rationing, gene therapy cures, suicidal netzero and degrowth policies?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Throawaylien/comments/nojrwn/connection_between_throawayliens_story_and/
Wasn't Putin a WEF younger leader of tomorrow, or whatever the title is? He seems to have tried every possible route to integrate with the west. Going full steam ahead with domestic surveillance/WHO integration/CDBC, at a much faster pace then the West.
Its interesting that Yevgeny Prigozhin/Wagner Group have disappeared down the memory hole so quickly. I still don't understand their rebellion. Seems that they were used for the heavy fighting, with the local militias and then thrown under the bus.
It's Biblical. All the prophecies fulfilled so far have predicted our current situation and provide a vision of what is to come. It's going to get a whole lot worse before it gets good.
I agree with your "ulterior objectives" one through six and "part" of seven. There's definitely a campaign by ruling elites to obliterate populism. In any event, whether it's a scamdemic or a "not war" the "expendables" or what Hillary deemed "deplorables" are always powerless.
Remember, Cheney and Clinton each had five deferments. And we all know about George Bush and his dubious career in the Texas National Guard. 😁
So to put it simply, psychopathic rulers don't give a damn about the human cost of war as long as it's economically profitable and provides a way to continue an agenda which heightens the power of World Governance.
Ukraine and Palestine will share a similar fate as their terroritories and resources are carved up like a juicy carcass for asset management firms to devour.
In the process a remaining, but very limited population will be experimental cannon-fodder for the developing biosecurity surveillance state which will make Stalinism look like a democracy.
The palpable sense of degeneracy, parasitism and regressive stupidity that characterizes the world stage defies any rational attempt to describe or even characterize. The current orchestration of events, and the obvious direction taken is so utterly alien to any sense of normalcy, that standard comparisons are simply inadequate.
In a very real sense, this disclosure of disaster cannot be dealt with by standard human modes of thought. Here we aren't merely discussing asymmetrical, deceptive, or duplicitous tactics, but a sneering, egomaniacal derision that typifies all top down relations, intensifying since the inception of the Covid plan.
People sense a clear and active evil, and the upper classes oblige through fulfilling that role.
What I find particularly interesting is the question as to why the ruling class is still alive. In nature, those who live in social groups only support leaders that support them, a circumstance which has long since departed the human sphere.
There is nothing at all in the way of leadership, to the image of a diaper wearing dolt as one's president, or a smirking lecturer quoting heavily redacted history, much less a Jewish homosexual posing for photo-ops. From a certain point of view these third rate wannabes are selected as an active mockery of the citizenry they rape and pillage, rather than represent.
I have my own explanation for all of this, my own views and vision, yet I cannot help but wonder how long it will take mankind to realize the state, and then do something about it.
In closing I would point out that to mystics, and Gnosticism is first and foremost mysticism-the Demiurge is not truly evil. Like all in manifestation, the Demiurge is beset by incompleteness, and since that incompleteness derives from ignorance, there is a sense of innocence that the evil of the ruling class cannot claim.
In short the Demiurge can be redeemed, for the depth of evil is not a recurring choice, but a result of a lack, a deficiency. Yet an active, knowing choice carries an entirely different set of circumstances, and penalties. The ancient masters were very careful in their descriptions of roots and causes, and we should be as well.
Thanks for this, Mike. If you don't believe our overlords are animated by the Demiurge, even though I think you profess gnostic beliefs, who do you believe they are animated by? Do you see a Devil figure in addition to a Demiurge, or something else?
Certainly the temptation is to award to the top dogs some type of spiritual authority. Such an explanation both greatly simplifies the image of the world and explains why it is so. Part of us longs for the dualistic cosmos of Descarte, if for no other reason than the fact that such is actually understandible.
However, I have never actually discovered a spiritual support for the top dogs. Rather, I have discovered a spiritual interference aimed at anyone who actively opposes the plan of power for powers sake.
This might seem like a spurious distinction, but it is the difference between faith and knowledge.
Therefore, the knowingly done evil of the top dogs might be participated in by certain spiritual forces, but said evil is not administered by such forces. In other words the choice to behave according to evil is the evil doers alone.
Those spiritual forces integrated into this entire society are by nature tied to what we refer to as the material world, and it is definitely true of the top dogs that any spiritual force they recognize must have a visible signature.
Any mystic worth their salt will tell you that a higher order than the physical exists, thus any force that is involved in the materium is also of a lower order. Therefore one can at least entertain a perspective whereby those who sit atop society are not steered by mighty forces, rather by extremely petty ones.
Perhaps this stirs a sense of the pathetic in their actions, because the scope of such action is quite small. Thusly said, the role of the Demiurge is one of returning to soundness of mind through the anagogic power within the cosmos and himself-a power which lies latent, but is very real. Perhaps my perspective is too limited, yet I have seen exactly nothing from the top dogs to so much as suggest that there even is an awareness that a path to wholeness is available to them.
In conclusion, the top dogs do not claim to any great spiritual authority. Their sphere of influence does not reach beyond this material existence, nor does it offer anything beyond it. Such abandonment is what powers their moral turpitude, that they cannot imagine anything more, and so they aspire to less.
So much more could be said, but I think this should be enough to chew on.
At the risk of being a simpleton:
Those in power are about separation from spirituality, while the rest of us strive to connect to it.
The separation itself could be considered "evil."
I do believe that separation alone is not the core principle, rather its the nature of that separation. For example, there is a certain kind of separation whereby one can forge an individual competency, through relying on principles and perspectives that have the ring of truth. We used to do this all the time, actually. It was second nature.
I confess that I lack sufficient interest to spend much more time on elite separation. I have verified for myself that their separation stems from a vapid certainty that spirituality doesn't exist, so they find nothing to be separated from.
What those who long for spirituality can, and should do is cultivate their connexion wherever and however they find it. A genuine link always carries with it a sense of wonder. This must always be flexible and a living experience. It can be very simple, as simple as the silence. In this way one will never fall victim to the abandonment of the elite, and so those subtle inner qualities will step into the value they are due.
Interesting take, and I can see where you get it.
I think you're putting too much.... trust, in the player's ability to cooperate though.
For instance, historically as empires break down, those with power start to grab it. We see this in the states. I've started referring to Abbot as Duke Abbot to shift narrative, but also because I believe that it is beginning to resemble the truth of the matter. As the states have, for years now, ignored federal law (with the blessing of the feds, no less!) on several issues, they become their own little fiefdoms.
And so, we see the American Empire begin to break at the seems even on the continent, let alone across the sea.
As far as the globohomo?
Maybe Putin wanted to be a player at one point. Maybe. Or maybe he was keeping his country's options open.
As far as I can tell, the long war in Ukraine is because he was, at the start, worried about having to fight all of NATO at once if he overextended. Plus, with them shipping off weapons systems and munitions, he got to grind down both the industrial base and financial base of the West. He's not playing just a physical war, he's also playing a financial and industrial war, and showing the world that Russian weapons systems can hold their own against the West's, at a much lower cost.
For instance, our artillery munitions cost about 5k to their 500, and their ability to pump them out is orders of magnitude higher. Its the same with all our weapons systems.
Our t-bill issuance is in shambles, and our debt ceiling is a nightmare, with 1/3 of our budget going to entitlement, of which a lot gets eaten up by immigrants who hate us. And we can't issue more t-bills, because we've weaponized the dollar so aggressively that no one wants it, the pensions and banks have too many, and it's all a mess.
So.... Yeah. He may be what you say. Or he may be playing a long game. I just think it suits him better to wear down the wests industrial base, not win a war too quickly, be loaded with a bunch of 'lets rebuild Ukraine' costs, and hand the problem back off to us after dividing Ukraine back up in thirds between Russia, Poland, and a rump state left to Kiev.
Hi Barbarian, I think the Abbott Texas stuff is all part of the globohomo game. The media "controversy" has been over a tiny stretch of the Texas border while the rest of it remains wide open. See here for more: https://thegoodcitizen.live/p/the-civil-war-psyop . I think Ken Paxton is much "realer" than Abbott is or has been.
Regarding Putin, I would encourage you to review Strelkov's list of dozens of tough questions posed to the Kremlin, all of which went unanswered: https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/39-questions-about-the-war-in-ukraine
Thanks for the reply and sharing those two posts. They're good food for thought.
I don't disagree that the Texas thing -may- be a song and dance. I think it's a dangerous one for globohomo, because it really does have the danger of turning into Duke Abbot, Lord of Texas. There's tons of historical precedent, and more and more legal and real precedent that we're making daily here in the US for governors to just flout US law and do whatever they want. It could be CIA, it could be anything, and then it could suddenly be Duke Abbot with an army at his back.
I'll just keep calling him Duke Abbot, because I truly think it's going that direction, no matter what the (un)official plan is.
As far as the second link, I believe that many of his questions can be answered by Putin not wanting a quick or easy war once he didn't immediately seize Kiev. After that, it became something to worry about NATO stepping in on other fronts (so holding back the elite troops and weapons) while grinding down the industrial, economic, and manpower of the west. We're funding, supplying, and giving them both intel and manpower over there (sorry, but if we give them money and they hire our 'fired' soldiers with generals as advisers and using our intel, I consider that really us fighting directly in reality with a fig leaf). Putin accepts the fig leaf because it suits him for whatever reason.
Maybe because it's as you say. I doubt it, because he has more power to gain -not- being a part of globohomo than in being a part of it. And I think it's clear to the world globohomo is falling apart at the seams.
So yeah, I can see answers to those questions. They just aren't the, "let's win the battle before us." answer, but, "Lets survive as a nation" answer. If that makes sense.
I should clarify
The Texas thing -is- a song and dance currently, that I think will fall apart as the country does. I think it will give Abbot a taste for power that he will enjoy and that he will drink deeply of the cup that has been passed to him.
That's why I don't really think it matters if it's a song or dance. The empire is breaking apart, and I think the Duke of Texas will rise.
I thought Rolo wrote this piece (reading it in my email box) but it had red lights from the beginning. And until I got to Julian Assange. :) Rolo will never post Julian Assange you know, so I thought definitely not right and not Rolo. Great, great article, thank you both.
People (Western audiences) tend to get big mad when Strelkov is brought up. I would imagine he has thousands and thousands of people who are thinking what’s happened to him is like making them fight with one arm tied behind their backs.
They strung him and the nationalists along as long as they could be used as cannon fodder. When it became too obvious over time what they were doing, i.e. a goal of stalemate and mass casualties with head-on frontal assaults into heavily fortified positions, well, Igor, into the slammer you and your ilk go...
Thank you for sharing that. I know next to nothing about this situation other than that this person was thrown in jail for criticising this war, which is hemorrhaging that part of the world to say the least. He was also accused of shooting down that airliner, which I absolutely doubt.
Right on, he exposed the phony war and told the truth, shattering the illusion and the fake narrative. That the Russian people are dying for olicharchs and jewish games instead of for their country. Obviously this couldnt stand so they threw him into the gulag on trumped up charges for 4 years. Which tells you this fake war will atleast go on for another 4 years or so.
I'm a little surprised that you concur with the 'stalemate' analysis of the Ukraine conflict. The Russians might not be taking much territory but they are killing huge numbers of Ukrainian conscripts, which can't go on forever. I say that as someone who lives in Central Europe and really does not want to get conscripted to go and fight in Ukraine, but some of the more swivel-eyed politicos seem to be priming populations for just that.
No argument with your point about the goal being an endless war, though.
This happened in Vietnam too (which I also see as controlled, btw) -- when the situation got (intentionally) bogged down the U.S. authorities switched to counting bodies as a proxy for victory. But if you step back and consider that (1) Ukraine as a whole was under Russian proxy control as recently as 2014, (2) the entire east half of Ukraine more-or-less was neutral-to-friendly to Russia at the start of the SMO, and that (3) Russia went from hoping for a quick decapitation strike against Kiev to getting bogged down in a morass so thick they apparently can't even conquer the rest of the Donbass, it's easy to see how the field of vision to victory has shrunk and shrunk and shrunk, even as Ukraine is being emptied out...
All wars are bankers' wars.
Even so, it does not matter who will win in Ukraine, the factories,land and resources there will fall under olicharch group 1 or group 2. If you think the local people there will benefits you probably believe in the toothferry too. Vietnam was the same phony war we now see in Ukraine except the roles were reversed and Russia was using Vietnam as a proxy against the US. The US used Vietnam as a testing ground tho, experimenting with new weapons,bombs and bioligical warfare like agent orange. Still the US casualties were quite low considering they have been there for a decade. This war in Ukraine is a war on steriods if you look at the casualties almost reaching ww1/ww2 levels.
"It’s a good Rorschach test - if a writer takes this interview at face value he doesn’t understand the subtext."
I see the "dissident" Right news-talkers all got their talking points memo: Putin's droning monologue about "You see, it all started with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in 1512..." was an attempt to paralyze listeners with boredom, while not addressing the immediate and actionable causes, but the "wise guys" on the Right interpret it as a 5D history lesson that proves Putin is superior to any of our midwit (and lower) politicians, and anyone who thinks otherwise is just a "typical bourgeois American ignorant of history." IOW, criticism of Putin becomes a chance to mock the rubes that make up their audience. Putin mocks us, and our "dissidents" mock us as well. Talk about "controlled opposition."
It would have been great if Tucker had interrupted him with "History is bunk." I mean, of course, droning recitations of historical and/or mythical grievances, as opposed to grasping the Big Picture, as in your post here.
Good comment, James. It is *not enough* to be reflexively against whatever it is that globohomo purports to be in favor of (or its opposite), as that can also be a trap. Being reactively pro-Putin because globohomo purportedly "hates" him is falling into that trap.
Reaction is weakness. Only a proactive vision that one can use as one's North Star can avoid the pitfalls of action-reaction-sythesis that globohomo is so famous for.
I would've thought that it started when Lithuania took Kiev after a stunning defeat of the Mongols in 1362 at Battle of Blue Waters
Well, looky here; is M. Tracey reading NF, or is it great minds etc.? "Putin seems content with his meandering historical digressions, as much of Tucker’s interview was occupied by him doing. American admirers seem very impressed by this skill — which is not so much in historical fluency, as it is an ability to avoid answering direct questions about his war policy." https://www.mtracey.net/p/the-war-in-ukraine-is-a-giant-disaster?publication_id=303188&post_id=141617715&isFreemail=true&r=18i956
Thanks for the link, James. I read Tracey occasionally a number of years ago where he offered some fair commentary on Trump but nothing recently. It's a good post for deflating the bubble that some among the far-right have created for Putin and it's comments about the Tucker interview were strong, although there were other points he made that I didn't quite agree with him on (an apparent argument for the eternal concreteness of existing national borders versus self-determination, the moral stances to the start of the war, etc -- positions he would perhaps have to take in order to retain any influence in the media, among the establishment, or maybe even his followers).
I don't think putin is anti LGBTQ/HOMO at all, he simply cannot support it because of the large amount of muslims and conservative minorities living in Russia. He would risk civil war if he supports it.
I very much appreciate your perspective. I always come away from your posts with my consciousness changed.
Thanks William. I'm a fan of your work as well.
https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-february-9-2024/comment/49240545
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination/comment/49378999
These are great links, thanks for sharing Tommy.
Fascinating analysis, and you might well be right on all of it. One thing I would say from my layman's perspective, is that perhaps politicians/leaders like Vladimir Putin and the other global players are all to some extent restrained and/or controlled by external parties - the cabal, if you will - but that the level of this control might wax and wane over the months, years and decades; and will to some degree be subject to modification and re-negotiation ad hoc. That is to say that it doesn't necessarily happen that "Leader A" has the same idea as "the cabal" or "Leader B" at any given point in geopolitical developments, of what is in his or his region's short-to-medium-term interests. Especially when we are dealing with conflicts on a battlefield, as being able to completely orchestrate events would seem to be (on the face of things) subject to errors and misjudgments which could have very unpredictable outcomes in the political and media space. Iain Davis expands on this very eloquently in his post from February. It might be of interest to some readers :
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-theyre-all-in-it-together-rebuttal?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Thanks Renewable. Yes, that's a great link by Iain Davis and I actually have a future post ready to go about it. The key part of it is, imo: "Agreement on the pillars does not suggest all national governments are of one, single hive mind. It suggests that governments do not control the global governance system. They are subject to it, just like the rest of us. The best they can achieve is "partner" status. And they are not senior partners."
Indeed. That is the thrust of the piece, or at least my broad take on it as I recall. Although I didn't necessarily completely agree on all the points raised, as would be expected. I will look forward to your contribution on this worldview !
What they do in Ukraine, they will eventually do here (or everywhere). Why? To "keep us safe," that's why.
Surrender your freedom(s) for safety. It's always the same lies, over and over.
I think that the biggest secret in all of this is that people would most likely get along quite well, without all of the contrived situations that lead to war. Sure there would still be wars, but they would make sense, and they wouldn't operate on a schedule.
Another anecdotal way that people can see how these wars and conflicts are contrived; someone is always making money! There's no war where someone isn't getting rich. Who are these people who have the ability to hold on to their capital -- until just the right war comes along? Nothing works that way, unless you KNOW when and where the wars are going to break out.
We're in for seriously hard road from here on out. They [the evil pukes pulling the strings] are getting set up to push the most restrictive control mechanisms at their disposal.
Everything comes down to regular people's ability to keep enough resources available outside of the current or new system. That way people can either fight back, or at least survive outside of the new WEF/Davos global slavery system.
I agree with your original summation and the update with one minor nitpick. It seems to me that Putin is using the Orthodox Church as an additional branch of government to control the masses. Other variations of Christianity are harassed or worse, but this one is allowed because it's under his thumb. I haven't seen any indication of its demise. Correct me if i am wrong here.
I love the GP3 chart. I first learned of it from Mark Moss, who teaches about economics and such on Odysee (also YT but i don't visit there anymore).
Yes.
The best thing for White Europeans around the world would have been for this war to have been avoided by a treaty along the lines of the treaty that neutralized Austria in the mid-1950s.
Putin proposed such a treaty. The US and Ukraine rejected it. Biden said the US would never put soldiers in Ukraine and that Ukraine would not be admitted to NATO but he said the US wouldn't put this in writing.
Putin would have had to be mentally retarded to have bought this after NATO's cynical gimmick in the Minsk Accords.
So, the USA got the war it wanted and had been working for since the USA overthrew the Ukrainian government in 2014 for the express reason that that government wanted amicable relations with Russia.
The next best thing would have been for Russia to have won a quick victory.
The longer the war goes on, the more deeply hatred is implanted between the Ukrainian and Russian people.
Our Deep State revels in family quarrels among European peoples. The longer the war goes on, the happier the "American" government is and the worse for all decent White European people both in Europe and around the world....including the pathetically conned and misruled White Europeans in the USA.
Yes, Putin seems to love his "They keep fooling me!" shtick. "They fooled me when they promised they would keep NATO out of Eastern Europe!" "They fooled me with the Maidan Revolution!" "They fooled me at Minsk 1!" "They fooled me at Minsk 2!" "They fooled me when we almost signed an early peace treaty with Zelensky until Meanie Boris Johnson nixed it!" He kind of likes being called incompetent, I guess -- but if you take the next step and accuse his actions as being intentional, you end up like Strelkov...
Playing on hatred and differences between European nations has been British foreign policy for centuries, the US simply continue using the same strategy when the UK was bankrupted during ww1 and ww2 and passed the torch over to America.