Did the last three years of COVID happen, or was it a bad dream?

More broadly, does anything happen unless the media says it does?

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” - William J. Casey, Director of the CIA from 1981 to 1987

For a change of stylistic pace, this post is in the form of a rant.

To start, I’ve been impressed with the dedication of many Substack authors who continue to highlight the deadliness of the COVID vaccines, the hypocrisy and lies of so-called “public health experts”, and the manipulation of official data since the hysteria ended. There is a regular drumbeat of posts about it; a snapshot covering just a couple of days includes here, here, here and here, although there were many more posted even during this brief time period. The consistency of these posts is a heartening thing; if we can preserve the monumental crime that was perpetrated by our globohomo overlords against the hapless public for future generations then, even if we don’t secure justice in the present moment, it will be worth it.

The puzzling thing is how liberals havn’t wanted to talk about the heart attack jab or COVID for the past year or so. When you bring it up to them in person they will give you a blank stare, be uncomfortable and want to change the topic. Complete radio silence, after obsessing about it like it was the Black Plague from March 2020 until 2022 sometime. Interesting, isn't it? They havn’t wanted to engage about it, like the past three years never happened. Perhaps it was all just a bad dream and we imagined everything.

A throwaway line when Arnold gets the memory injection in Total Recall gives the film’s ending away, strongly hinting that he was lobotomized and the rest of the film was a fever dream. Sorry if this is a spoiler, the movie is 30+ years old.

As Mark Twain allegedly said, “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” These liberals and NPCs have learned nothing from the COVID mass-forced-injection experiment. There has been no introspection or lessons learn. For the past year they just wanted to move on with life.

In effect, because they were unwilling to examine their defective train of thought and why they put such faith in the media and so-called “experts” - despite being wrong to the point of it risking their health and those of their family members - they are sure to fall for whatever the next scam is, whether it is bringing COVID back for another round of hysteria (which globohomo is field testing as you read this; Infowars claims whistleblowers have told them major restrictions will be back by October) or otherwise. It could be literally anything; as long as it is repeated hard enough by the mainstream media and so-called “experts”, they will believe it, seemingly without exception.

The NPC, from one Current Thing to the next with zero introspection, forever

Underlying their lack of introspection is a question: why do and did they believe the so-called experts? I was discussing this question in person recently with an NPC liberal, nice guy, and his attempted bleat of a response was with respect to the nature of lay person knowledge. Essentially his argument is: why do online dissidents feel like we know as much as an “expert” when they’ve been credentialed in their speciality and have spent years or decades learning their craft? The world is too complicated for us to know that much, which is why humans have specialized in a very specific, niche field vs. in the past when people were more generalists. There could never be another Aristotle or Plato generalist genius, for example, because there is simply too much information in the world for even a genius to become master of but a tiny portion of humanity’s current level of knowledge (this guy didn’t articulate his argument like this, of course, because NPCs are incapable of offering arguments that have not been mommy-fed to them by the media, but i am trying to steel-man his argument).

The response to the steel-manned NPC argument is that lay people, even though they are likely to have less specific knowledge than experts, have not been institutionally captured. During COVID the few experts that spoke out against it were cancelled — they lost their jobs, they lost their funding, they lost their reputation, they were banned from propagating their message on social media, etc. For experts who have mortgages, or kids to feed, or expenses, who want or need to further their own career, how could they ever speak up amidst the fury of globohomo attacking anyone who did? At best they sympathized with dissidents but remained muzzled and silent, but most of them knew in their gut not even to proceed that far because the cognitive dissonance it could create for them could lead to uncomfortable later decisions. So the vast, vast majority of “experts” would naturally and understandably fall into line.

And even though fraudvirus was an extreme example, these same pressures exist in every field where one becomes an “expert” and rely on not bucking the establishment line or the system to maintain their career. This is why laymen are really the only ones who can afford to speak truth to power, especially anonymous ones on the internet, and especially those comprising the loser clique, even if they may be wrong quite a bit of the time and possess less knowledge than the experts.

I actually like the constant attacks from the right on COVID, which I think has somewhat better odds (still very low) of bearing fruit than attacks on transsexualism. This is because transsexualism is rooted in the egalitarian values based in the core of Western society while the COVID issue is not, and is therefore easier to attack psychologically.

But still, even if the attacks on the COVID vaccines are accurate, it was way less deadly than advertised by the right. Most of these Substack authors highlight how many people died unnecessarily from it, what a tragedy it is, etc., but I see it from the opposite angle: why wasn’t there the promised mass vaccinated die-off so that the independent minded anti-vaxxers would inherit the earth? Very disappointing.

---

Does anything exist if the media doesn’t cover it?

This raises a deeper question: does anything exist if the media doesn’t cover it? The enormous toxic train spill in East Palestine, Ohio has been completely forgotten about, and it was being compared to Chernobyl with poisoned air, water, and land which could last decades. Dead silence from the media; the media doesn’t cover it for more than a couple days, and only piecemeal, so did it even happen? Has anything come from the right’s focus on the sustained fraudvirus scam? Lord Fauci has tens of millions in his offshore bank accounts or more and permanent taxpayer funded security.

Lord Fauci, COVID whisperer

Now the Maui fire with maybe 1,000 dead are being covered by the right in a similar fashion, see here and here, but there are many daily breathless Substack posts about it. How long until this too is forgotten?

Or how about on the flip side, let’s take an example in a totally different category. The song “Rich Men North of Richmond” has become a huge hit, which is supposed to be a Southern attack on the values of Washington D.C. But the whole thing is astroturfed, highlighted by the media and blown up from nothing; the singer has a fake Southern accent in the video and he was recorded saying establishment shibboleths like “diversity is our strength.” Apparently a marketing expert set the whole thing up.

It’s not that the power of the mainstream media is immense - it may be almost absolute and simply sets the parameters of what constitutes reality for most people.

If a tree falls in the woods and the media doesn’t cover it, did it actually fall?

Let’s go through a brief list of items highlighted or downplayed by the media, to their central bank owner master’s benefit:

1. Hurricane Katrina - Highlighted to hurt George W. Bush

2. North Carolina Hurricane Matthew destruction - Downplayed to hurt white people

3. Las Vegas shooting - Downplayed as conservative whites were the victims and to protect Las Vegas tourism

4. Waukesha Christmas parade attack - Same, with Muslim attacker

5. BLM riots - Highlighted at the time to portray Orange Man as weak on crime prevention, then deliberately forgotten

6. Notre Dame cathedral fire - downplayed, caused by a Muslim but never officially announced for political reasons

7. The 737 MAX crashes - downplayed, hurt faith in the airlines too much

8. The 2016 Colbert election special - scrubbed from the internet and downplayed because it made liberals look out-of-touch and foolish

9. Pink slime being reinstated into food - downplayed because globohomo wants you eating mass produced food

10. The 1970s Weatherman Days of Rage - downplayed, leading to terrorists becoming institutionalized as professors within universities

11. The Clinton Foundation filing a $16.8 million loss in 2018 with revenue down 90%+ after losing the 2016 election (is this not powerful circumstantial evidence of pay-for-play?) - downplayed and forgotten about

12. The publicly accessible video of Biden bragging about forcing Ukraine to fire its anti-corruption prosecutor or lose $1 billion dollars of aid - downplayed and forgotten about

13. The four years of Trump’s presidency, where every minor detail was highlighted in a hysterical fashion by the media

Just recently a Syrian Muslim would-be attacker in North Dakota, heavily armed with 1,800 rounds of ammunition, was going to shoot up a street festival. Has anyone heard of this? No, and I only did because a friend mentioned it to me. Zero impact on society. But if globohomo cared they could have easily built it up into something huge and create political change out of it.

I could go on and list another hundred things the media highlights or downplays, but the point is this: the media conducts their highlighting or downplaying, they decide how intensely to push the issue and for how long, then the globohomo-backed politicians act on that media pressure to conduct the goals of the Rothschild & co. central bank owners, and then establishment historians, teachers and professors inscribe these false narratives as facts and brainwash the next generation to believe it wholeheartedly. There is a complete, closed feedback loop from narrative creation and dissemination to political change to social shaping as the demonstration of oligarchical power, with no outside influence. The right has no such loop, nothing even slightly close to it; it can whine and point out the hypocrisy of the left or of globohomo or whatever, but because there is no path for the right toward power or money or putting their perspective into power with it (with no control over the DOJ, FBI, court system, legislature, mainstream media, Federal Reserve, universities, public schools, social media companies, etc), eventually the right gets tired of discussing it and spinning their wheels with no change and, quiet and dispirited, but not having learned the lesson, they move on to toothlessly criticizing the next globohomo narrative. A total loss, toothless and ineffective.

Yes, the built-up rage at white displacement led to Orange Man’s presidency in 2016, which was a mistake on globohomo’s part as they were too lazy to rig the election properly, a lesson they learned and will never let happen again. Globohomo isn’t omnipotent and they occasionally do make mistakes. But Trump accomplished nothing and now he’s likely going to prison, probably for the rest of his life.

Therefore, circling back, even though the right has done an impressive job of keeping arguments about the COVID death jabs alive, it seems like it will inevitably fade into a background issue (more than it has already) out of faltering energies levels due to no ways to translate those ideas into power. I guess if globohomo brings fraudvirus hysteria back for another round it will sustain the oppositional energies for awhile longer.

Now, there is a residue of truth that remains in the dead husk of lost political/societal arguments and can be found by the astute, discerning individual. But it is in the back-alley, through the low status “conspiracy theory”, and again, without any ability to translate that knowledge into power. But how did those conspiracy theories even come into existence, who passed them along? To what extent can *any* truth be ascertained today? For the Maui fires, who is pushing the various conspiracy theories and for what purpose? I don’t trust globohomo even slightly, but keep in mind the concept of cognitive infiltration. This cognitive infiltration strategy was articulated by Cass Sunstein in 2008 in an article titled “Conspiracy Theories” for the Journal of Political Philosophy, where he made a radical proposal: “Our main policy claim here is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories.”…they defined “cognitive infiltration” as a program “whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups.” Given Sunstein is so influential and we have seen this strategy employed numerous times (for example, with flat earth or aliens or Chinese weather balloons), with the purpose being to sew confusion and distract from other issues, how can we be sure the perspective fed to the right on any issue is indeed accurate? Are you yourself going out and verifying facts, and if so to what extent and how? If not, why do you choose to blindly accept the alternative set of “facts” offered to you?

---

Conclusion

Does anything happen on a political or cultural level unless the globohomo-owned mainstream media and their kayfabe bought-and-paid politicians say it does? And not just now, but throughout all of modern history where oligarchical-owned media set the narratives of reality (instead of in the past when dictator/kings or religious authorities would, and to a much more rudimentary extent)? I think the answer is no. They set the terms of modern reality almost entirely and we peasants merely react to it.

Insert hackneyed Matrix quote

John Swinton, editor of the New York Sun, had this to say about the profession of journalism in 1883:

"There is no such a thing in America as an independent press, unless it is out in country towns. You are all slaves. You know it, and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to express an honest opinion. If you expressed it, you would know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid $150 for keeping honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for doing similar things. If I should allow honest opinions to be printed in one issue of my paper, I would be like Othello before twenty-four hours: my occupation would be gone. The man who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street hunting for another job. The business of a New York journalist is to distort the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to villify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread, or for what is about the same — his salary. You know this, and I know it; and what foolery to be toasting an "Independent Press"! We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping-jacks. They pull the string and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our possibilities, are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”

The media acts as intellectual prostitutes for the Rothschild central bank owners.

The core of the matter is: without both (1) possessing a media apparatus to consistently amplify the right’s messages to the retarded public, and (2) a means by which those messages can be directed into political action (which doesn’t exist for the dissident right), it’s akin to screaming into the wind. It’s nice to figure out the truth for yourself and for other dissidents on the right for its own sake and with the intent of our own spiritual progression, but approaching the understanding of politics with the intent of influencing it is a fool’s errand at this time, and will remain so until such time when a dissident feedback loop of narrative-to-power can be established, if ever.

Ultimately politics is downstream of belief, and only a Nietzschian transvaluation of values away from materialistic egalitarianism in order to change the perspective and worldview of all events and “facts” has a chance of ever resulting in the changes that dissidents want. Retaining the underlying egalitarian values of society, in combination with the lack of any right-wing narrative-politician-cultural power feedback loop, is destined to remain a permanent failure.

Modern nightmare of astroturfed reality brought to you by the mainstream media