My gut has also been telling me that Trump's win isn't the end of the story. This post reads frighteningly like something that may come to pass. I sincerely hope this isn't the case but if it is, may God have mercy on us all.
On the other hand, Trump and his newly-accumulated working entourage are not dumb, naive, and blindly trusting. Which makes a person think about the chess pieces the new administration is laying out with its various planned cabinet appointments. What effects, for example, would and could an engaged Tulsi Gabbard have on heading off possible Neocon skulduggery like you describe? Note also the new administration's close-to-its-chest extra-governmental conduct of its transition business: doing their own 'vetting' of its various future executive agents, for example.
This increases the odds that the CIA/FBI tries again, not decrease it. A very dumb move.
Re: Gabbard, Sundance is less than impressed at the placement of her as DNI: "Mrs Gabbard has never led any organization of scale, nor held any position of intelligence review that I am aware of." Basically, he does not think she will have the sophistication, even if she has the right motivation, to untangle the intricate depths of the security state.
It's interesting that the AGR Intl. building Crooks took his shot from (where no security footage from the building was taken) was recently bought up by private equity firm CD&R through a subsidiary called Indicor. The CEO of CD&R is Donald J. Gogel https://www.nndb.com/people/927/000163438/
It's a multivariable equation, this administration Trump et al. appear to be constructing. As such, Gabbard's effects would be incremental and not all-determining. As to Trump himself buying into the CIA/FBI narrative -- ever heard of the concepts of 'head fake' or 'poker face'? Used quite often in negotiations of all sorts. And, who is "Sundance"?
Yes, I'm aware of the concept of a head fake. But publicly buying into the narrative, even if he holds back his true opinions privately, still advances the interests of his enemies (if they kill him it'll be easier to start a war with Iran - "look, MAGA, even Trump himself warned about it!"). Sundance writes at The Conservative Treehouse - he's an optimist and a lot of his higher level analysis I've found to be wrong, but his focus is on the granular details of how government works - especially the security state - and there's a lot to be learned from him on that topic, imo...
Trump might be taking a risk, admittedly. But oftentimes fear of possible risk has to be put aside to work to gain something of great, long-time value. (That's gone completely out of fashion for many people in the US when it used to be a quite common national attribute.) Thanks for the Sundance reference.
Iran is the crown jewel in the NeoCons list of regime change wars for the last 25 years. it’s pretty much the last one since Iraq, Syria, Libya and now Ukraine/Russia have all been run aground.
I think they are sensing that the Ukraine conflict is a bust so let's wrap that up and go for broke. it all sounds so cartoonishly ghoulish but this is how these bastards think.
I agree that Ukraine is a win, although the ultimate goal of replacing Putin has been thwarted.
perhaps they thought that the Oct 7 war would draw in Iran, but it seems they aren’t taking the bait. an assassination would be the perfect (and probably last) hope they have for full scale war.
5 hrs ago·edited 5 hrs agoLiked by Neoliberal Feudalism
I agree with the thrust of this piece. The election was a skirmish compared to the battle upcoming (now at the level of the two armies hurling insults and jokes at each other before the upcoming encounter in January) and part of a longer war between rival oligarchic systems both domestic and internationally based.
But I disagree with one particular, namely that DJT assassination is the main event setting the others he lays out in motion. First: why not another assassination attempt, this time with a more convincing flesh wound (like left arm bicep)?
Second, assuming the First, would not Trump be the ideal White Man Leader to galvanize young white men, non-stop vilified by teachers and media but now recently allowed to feel pride and hope again by their Working Class Billionaire Captain America Donald, to sign up and go on a Holy Crusade against the infidel Persians once and for all?
The reluctant warrior trope is almost a sine qua non of the action movie genre that animates much of Trump's public persona, especially with younger men. A family man, a man who knows how to fight and kill but is now living in quiet, humble retirement working as a teacher or carpenter or some such is troubled by an embodied demon from his past who threatens his child and forces him out of retirement, back into the fray, each bone-crunching encounter and kill be morally justified, even celebrated. Surely Trump as War Leader is far more effective a motivator than Trump as Martyr?
The notion that his death would split the right is no doubt accurate. But that won't help wage a protracted war in the Middle East if that is what is desired.
However:
I happen to think this is not what is desired. I think the core dynamic is a Body Politic finally is rising up to throw off a Parasite, which is no longer in control of the host, which parasite has two main vectors:
1. The financial-bankster-MICIMATT parasite which profits off conflict and turmoil, also by strangling the population in endless self-serving regulations to the point when, inevitably, there has to be a reform period so it all starts all over again. Some factions within this parasite see the need for reform and are involved in instigating it so they can end up well positioned on the other side; indeed, they are quite probably the main drivers.
2. The Zionist agenda, probably an offshoot of the financial Money Power but also mixed with eschatological fervour engendering cult-like devotion among many Jews and Christians alike, people who find meaning in causes greater than themselves - an unfortunate blend of wisdom with delusion not unusual in human affairs. And so here we are: there is no resolution except by conflict and then more conflict until the end of time Eschaton. And yet seemingly the Body Politic keeps hosting this parasite, though to do so it has to embrace a type of Nihilism which the current shift in mood is going to find less and less appealing.
I don't believe Trump has any inclination to deal with Nr. 2, indeed it seems he is somewhat captured by it, nor does it seem that anyone else at this juncture could realistically make the attempt. I do not pretend to understand why this is so. However, perhaps he is sincerely going to take a crack at Nr 1 (and perhaps in so doing create the conditions for later on remedying Nr 2).
If true, we will see him
a) stop the conflict in Ukraine and Israel beyond its borders
b) resolve the Israel crisis most likely by exiling most Palestinians to nearby States
c) having peace in the region including peace between Israel and Iran
d) helping the US find its place in the multipolar paradigm including
e) more influence in Latin America, its natural zone, pushing Chinese out
That's foreign. Domestically, DOGE promises to bite deep into the parasitic elements of the Body Politic and significantly change the current DC-centered paradigm into something else. (In this regard, would not be surprised if most Term Two business is conducted from the Southern White House instead of the one in DC.)
His entrance to MSG last night, with Avengers entourage (probably hanging around so much for security reasons) was like a modern day King with a Court. The crowd response was massive and authentic. The event champion came to the Donald and offered him his belt and then spontaneously bowed deeply to him, a gesture not natural in American culture but as old as humanity itself.
The Donald is doing something we haven't really seen since the Camelot period. He is Making America Great Again NOW. America is rushing back into a vivid, uplifting Present, into a sense of dynamic Nowness which is the sine qua non of any leading civilization and which America hasn't collectively felt in many a weary decade. Yes, there are still battles to be fought, but what is happening right now politically is a once in a lifetime dynamic wherein it seems that, warts and all, Trump is the right man at the right time. It is on the borderline of creating sacred space, which is essential royalty which comes from the vividness of Nowness which is an altered state of consciousness we all share all the time but generally cover over with bad mental and physical habits (the stuff of esoteric spiritual method etc.).
Hence, although the danger of assassination is real via those parasites who wish to prevent this gestalt from blossoming lest it dislodge them from the host culture, I am cautiously optimistic that the somewhat surreal Avenger Team is aware of the dangerous elements in the mix and will do all they can to thwart them.
(Or maybe I just spend too much time these days reading and watching Youtubes!!)
Thanks RR. I agree with you that Trump might be a better promoter of the Zionist agenda than via his assassination. Re: his administration, I think we will see some shallow positive benefits - some portion of the southern wall built, some of the worst felon illegals expelled, some tariffs - but the three core issues will remain unaddressed: (1) the extent of illegal immigration (20 million let into the country within the past four years alone), (2) the national debt, the problem of which is intractable without revolutionary action, i.e. persistent 20% inflation is here to stay (or more) and (3) the institutionalized voter fraud (mail in ballot fraud, electronic voting Dominion fraud, ballot harvesting fraud, ballot stuffing in critical swing states, etc) remains, even if our elites allowed Trump to win this election. My last post delved into this...
I am not yet convinced it will be that vapid. But it's certainly possible. I guess we'll know in about a year's time.
One possibility is that most of the most daring Cabinet picks get blocked, then none of promised reforms transpired and the nation remains with a fake leadership class blaming the other side whilst the Powers that Be stay on top.
But I think something bigger is under way which will derail that.
One (of many) reasons I think this time it might prove different is RFKj. I find it hard to believe, again narrative-wise, that someone who uncle and father were assassinated is a shallow, performative person on the public stage. I think that, just as he actually cleaned up the Hudson River in reality going against large corporations, he will effect substantive reform in the Big Pharma Big Ag sphere which is related to all the other Big Bullshit areas. It's like if Big Pharma reform is a gut punch, the entire body with other organs and appendages will double over and begin to stagger. I am looking for substantive reform. If DOGE does even half of what Vivek regularly spells out, it's going to be a very big deal.
There seem to be three challenges for DJT and DOGE: 1) Extract the current rot from the system, 2) make sure that rot can't circumvent or reform as another power column (eg., Dulles); 3) create a new transparent system with checks and balances that endures.
A terrible, but plausible, possibility. I wonder about the zionist angle, though. October 7th fractured the Left along pro-Israel, pro-Palestinian lines. The scenario described in this post would almost certainly fracture the Right along zionist vs non-zionist and anti-zionist lines, and would probably push a lot of non-zionists towards an avowed anti-zionism. The Bolshevik golem is gotting away from them on the Left (and war with Iran would hasten that process), and this would destroy the Right, meaning that a very pro-Palestine Bolshevik Left would probably become politically dominant throughout the West. Israel would be cooked. (But ... the Central Banksters are a different story, and I guess that's what this all ultimately comes down to.)
Thank you for the article; I couldn't quite square why globohomo would attempt to assassinate Trump but then let him win the election, but this explains it quite well. One thing I would caution against is assuming that the goal of the war is to create a Greater Israel of some sorts. The Israeli government is as ineffective in advocating for the interests of Jews as the United States Government is in advocating for the interests of its citizens. For more information, check out this article by the ardent Zionist Baruch Hasofer on the Israeli deep state, and their reactions to the right's attempt to partially release Globohomo's yoke on them: https://postkahanism.substack.com/p/you-think-were-the-left-were-not. (His substack is quite an interesting read)
I am not the biggest fan of Israel, but I think that Globohomo fears even the slightest hint of nationalism as opposed to globalism in any country, particularly Israel.
Interesting theory but highly unlikely. Both Jews and Christians view DJT as a messianic figure. The fulfillment of their prophecies is not possible if he's dead. He's an amazing salesman and will be much more effective alive than dead at dragging us into war with Iran and squeezing the last drops out of the american empire.
Don't have an attribution. Some things are just difficult to know with high confidence. For example, the physical means by which the towers were brought down on 9/11.
I think the assassination attempts are similar in that they are primarily public mind manipulation events. The imagery on screens is primary. The physical world is used like a set with props to create that imagery. Look how the regular agents were swapped out for more photogenic ones and the cameramen were moved into position before the shooting (foreknowledge).
It's like the moon landing pictures. In many instances, they eschewed sticking to realistic lighting and physics to go for the perfect shot and interesting visuals.
I havn't seen regular agents being swapped out for more photogenic ones or that cameramen were moved into position (other than per standard practice in rallies) - any links on this? And if they are primarily public mind manipulation events, how would you explain the dead Trump supporter and the seriously wounded others?
Aside from that, I agree with you generally that we are in an era where underlying events don't really even have to happen - it's all about manipulating public perception. Baudrillard called this conception hyperreality (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality ) , and I'll likely cover him in the future...
Thanks for the links. The different detail can be seen as replacing experienced agents with inexperienced agents (easier to attempt the assassination), or instead replacing regular agents with corrupted agents with some knowledge for the plan. Re: the Odysee clip, why would photographers be placed behind the candidate instead of in front of the candidate in the first place? Seems strange, not good angles for photos. And the guy who took the famous Trump fist-pump photo came up after the attack, he's not the guy featured in the Odysee clip: https://x.com/dvdaltizer/status/1812334187292086601
Yes important to recall what Col Fletcher Prouty said about JFK assassination. All they had to do was loosen security and the rest would take care of itself. Note Jill Biden and Allegheny County College pres, where Crooks graduated, knew each other.
Crooks' was moved out of the county and autopsy performed by zionist recently returned from Israel, FBI engaged Israeli company to get into Crooks' phone, scene controlled by governor Shapiro, Iran blamed. So it's obvious who was behind it. But we're supposed to believe these same people want to knock off Zion Don but failed? Very unlikely.
All those things you mention, if true, can easily just be described as the clean-up operation so information doesn't point to the security state. They did the same thing with overseeing every aspect of their Kennedy assassination.
Re: "failure", we've discussed this previously but it's hard to do a "grassy knoll" multiple-shooter attempt in an era of ubiquitous phone and security camera surveillance; much easier to use an MKUltra victim. And I have still not heard an adequate "fake assassination attempt" theory that adequately explains the dead Trump guy in the audience and multiple other Trump attendees seriously wounded.
I don't get granular with such things preferring to just survey on the narrative level to see what fits well, much like when grading a movie. My first thought of course was that this was a setup somehow but as far as I can tell, unless they have microdrones the size of ants which could have zinged Trump's ear making him believe he got hit at the same time that some bullets whizzed by which all heard (and which hit some bystanders, killing one), Trump would have had to be in on the act, possibly nicking his own ear with a concealed blade along one fingernail (not hard to pull off) or some such.
And I just don't see him going along with such a thing if for no other reason that several others would know about it and he would never know if he could trust them to keep the secret or not and would thus be just another puppet. He may have made some questionable alliances with both material and other forces to win this election, but I doubt he would consent to puppet hood. Just doesn't fit his narrative arc.
I doubt Crooks was killed. More like he is living in Europe with a beard and somebody else involuntarily provided a lookalike body. Like with JFK whose corpse was played by a local cop killed around the same time as the President and whose nickname in the station was 'JFK 2' (or some such, don't recall it precisely). How many revealing facts about the attempt have been forthcoming now several months later? Am not aware of any, so clearly this was an inside job and the ones investigating are covering up, which is par for the course in such matters.
The argument is specious. Joe Biden is president until January 20, 2015. It would be Biden's war. If Trump is dead on January 20, there is no guarantee JD Vance would become president even then. This unprecedented circumstance would invoke a constitutional crisis. Neither Vance nor Kamala Harris would be next in line. The president may well be Mike Johnson, speaker of the house, until a new election could be held. The Supreme Court may well have to decide. The US could hardly be engaging in a major war with Iran with all this going on. The Deep State may well have missed the boat.
Globohomo could own the nationalists if they can get Trump to go full Hitler
Don't tell RFK
Their motive? Israel’s much touted Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, who ruled that country from its inception in 1948 until he resigned on June 16, 1963, was so enraged at John F. Kennedy for not allowing Israel to become a nuclear power that, Collins asserts, in his final days in office he commanded the Mossad to become involved in a plot to kill America’s president.
Ben-Gurion was so convinced that Israel’s very survival was in dire jeopardy that in one of his final letters to JFK he said, “Mr. President, my people have the right to exist, and this existence is in danger.”
In the days leading up to Ben-Gurion’s resignation from office, he and JFK had been involved in an unpublicized, contentious debate over the possibility of Israel getting nuclear capabilities. Their disagreement eventually escalated into a full-fledged war of words that was virtually ignored in the press. Ethan Bronner wrote about this secret battle between JFK and Ben-Gurion years later in a New York Times article on October 31, 1998, calling it a “fiercely hidden subject.” In fact, the Kennedy/Ben-Gurion conversations are still classified by the United States Government. Maybe this is the case because Ben-Gurion’s rage and frustration became so intense – and his power so great within Israel – that Piper contends it was at the center of the conspiracy to kill John Kennedy. This stance is supported by New York banker Abe Feinberg, who describes the situation as such: “Ben-Gurion could be vicious, and he had such a hatred of the old man [Joe Kennedy, Sr., JFK’s father].” Ben-Gurion despised Joe Kennedy because he felt that not only was he an anti-Semite, but that he had also sided with Hitler during the 1930’s and 40’s. [We will touch upon this aspect of the story in an upcoming article entitled The CIA and Organized Crime: Two Sides of the Same Coin].
How do you see him going “full Hitler” when his announced cabinet is perhaps the most pro-Zionist cabinet in U.S. history and his grandchildren are all Jewish?
It is also naked self interest. The Milley's and Strozak's of the world must be feeling some unease.
I think too, there were too many people watching this time. If they stole it it might have resulted in civil war and the destruction of their basis or power.
I think that is just as likely, if they kill Trump. My instinct would be open season on globohomo elite.
The SS snipers were being fired on from the trees and that's who likely shot bystanders as they are all lined up. Coincidentally a large tractor was parked in same line directly in front of Trump protecting him.
Meanwhile arch zionist and 9/11 person of interest Howard Lutnick is the guy actually running things and making these appointments. To think they want their long time asset Trump dead just as he's about to give them their war is a cope.
I have looked at the layout previously and yes, a tractor blocked the line of sight from the water tower so no second sniper from that position. If you have layout evidence otherwise you want to present, I’m open to seeing it.
Yes, Lutnick leads Trump’s transition team. Trump’s philosophy is “peace through strength” - he had John Bolton as his NSA and Pompeo at State in his first term, for examples. But this can easily be co-opted to “strength through strength” if he is killed.
But sure, it’s entirely possible that Trump gives Israel their Iran war even with him alive. We’ll see…
My gut has also been telling me that Trump's win isn't the end of the story. This post reads frighteningly like something that may come to pass. I sincerely hope this isn't the case but if it is, may God have mercy on us all.
On the other hand, Trump and his newly-accumulated working entourage are not dumb, naive, and blindly trusting. Which makes a person think about the chess pieces the new administration is laying out with its various planned cabinet appointments. What effects, for example, would and could an engaged Tulsi Gabbard have on heading off possible Neocon skulduggery like you describe? Note also the new administration's close-to-its-chest extra-governmental conduct of its transition business: doing their own 'vetting' of its various future executive agents, for example.
Trump himself bought into the false CIA/FBI narrative and broadcast it online: https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1838802596066209994
This increases the odds that the CIA/FBI tries again, not decrease it. A very dumb move.
Re: Gabbard, Sundance is less than impressed at the placement of her as DNI: "Mrs Gabbard has never led any organization of scale, nor held any position of intelligence review that I am aware of." Basically, he does not think she will have the sophistication, even if she has the right motivation, to untangle the intricate depths of the security state.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/11/13/president-trump-announces-nomination-of-tulsi-gabbard-to-director-of-national-intelligence/
It's interesting that the AGR Intl. building Crooks took his shot from (where no security footage from the building was taken) was recently bought up by private equity firm CD&R through a subsidiary called Indicor. The CEO of CD&R is Donald J. Gogel https://www.nndb.com/people/927/000163438/
with the founder being Joseph L. Rice III
https://www.cdr.com/team/joseph-l-rice-iii
Maybe a coincidence but you could not find any bigger swamp creatures than these two fellows in my opinion.
It's a multivariable equation, this administration Trump et al. appear to be constructing. As such, Gabbard's effects would be incremental and not all-determining. As to Trump himself buying into the CIA/FBI narrative -- ever heard of the concepts of 'head fake' or 'poker face'? Used quite often in negotiations of all sorts. And, who is "Sundance"?
Yes, I'm aware of the concept of a head fake. But publicly buying into the narrative, even if he holds back his true opinions privately, still advances the interests of his enemies (if they kill him it'll be easier to start a war with Iran - "look, MAGA, even Trump himself warned about it!"). Sundance writes at The Conservative Treehouse - he's an optimist and a lot of his higher level analysis I've found to be wrong, but his focus is on the granular details of how government works - especially the security state - and there's a lot to be learned from him on that topic, imo...
Trump might be taking a risk, admittedly. But oftentimes fear of possible risk has to be put aside to work to gain something of great, long-time value. (That's gone completely out of fashion for many people in the US when it used to be a quite common national attribute.) Thanks for the Sundance reference.
Iran is the crown jewel in the NeoCons list of regime change wars for the last 25 years. it’s pretty much the last one since Iraq, Syria, Libya and now Ukraine/Russia have all been run aground.
I think they are sensing that the Ukraine conflict is a bust so let's wrap that up and go for broke. it all sounds so cartoonishly ghoulish but this is how these bastards think.
I see Ukraine as a huge win for globohomo (two prior posts on it: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-ukrainian-stalemate-intentionally and https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/how-real-is-the-russiaukraine-war ), but I otherwise agree with you: Iran is the last bump in the road toward the Greater Israel project…
I agree that Ukraine is a win, although the ultimate goal of replacing Putin has been thwarted.
perhaps they thought that the Oct 7 war would draw in Iran, but it seems they aren’t taking the bait. an assassination would be the perfect (and probably last) hope they have for full scale war.
I agree with the thrust of this piece. The election was a skirmish compared to the battle upcoming (now at the level of the two armies hurling insults and jokes at each other before the upcoming encounter in January) and part of a longer war between rival oligarchic systems both domestic and internationally based.
But I disagree with one particular, namely that DJT assassination is the main event setting the others he lays out in motion. First: why not another assassination attempt, this time with a more convincing flesh wound (like left arm bicep)?
Second, assuming the First, would not Trump be the ideal White Man Leader to galvanize young white men, non-stop vilified by teachers and media but now recently allowed to feel pride and hope again by their Working Class Billionaire Captain America Donald, to sign up and go on a Holy Crusade against the infidel Persians once and for all?
The reluctant warrior trope is almost a sine qua non of the action movie genre that animates much of Trump's public persona, especially with younger men. A family man, a man who knows how to fight and kill but is now living in quiet, humble retirement working as a teacher or carpenter or some such is troubled by an embodied demon from his past who threatens his child and forces him out of retirement, back into the fray, each bone-crunching encounter and kill be morally justified, even celebrated. Surely Trump as War Leader is far more effective a motivator than Trump as Martyr?
The notion that his death would split the right is no doubt accurate. But that won't help wage a protracted war in the Middle East if that is what is desired.
However:
I happen to think this is not what is desired. I think the core dynamic is a Body Politic finally is rising up to throw off a Parasite, which is no longer in control of the host, which parasite has two main vectors:
1. The financial-bankster-MICIMATT parasite which profits off conflict and turmoil, also by strangling the population in endless self-serving regulations to the point when, inevitably, there has to be a reform period so it all starts all over again. Some factions within this parasite see the need for reform and are involved in instigating it so they can end up well positioned on the other side; indeed, they are quite probably the main drivers.
2. The Zionist agenda, probably an offshoot of the financial Money Power but also mixed with eschatological fervour engendering cult-like devotion among many Jews and Christians alike, people who find meaning in causes greater than themselves - an unfortunate blend of wisdom with delusion not unusual in human affairs. And so here we are: there is no resolution except by conflict and then more conflict until the end of time Eschaton. And yet seemingly the Body Politic keeps hosting this parasite, though to do so it has to embrace a type of Nihilism which the current shift in mood is going to find less and less appealing.
I don't believe Trump has any inclination to deal with Nr. 2, indeed it seems he is somewhat captured by it, nor does it seem that anyone else at this juncture could realistically make the attempt. I do not pretend to understand why this is so. However, perhaps he is sincerely going to take a crack at Nr 1 (and perhaps in so doing create the conditions for later on remedying Nr 2).
If true, we will see him
a) stop the conflict in Ukraine and Israel beyond its borders
b) resolve the Israel crisis most likely by exiling most Palestinians to nearby States
c) having peace in the region including peace between Israel and Iran
d) helping the US find its place in the multipolar paradigm including
e) more influence in Latin America, its natural zone, pushing Chinese out
That's foreign. Domestically, DOGE promises to bite deep into the parasitic elements of the Body Politic and significantly change the current DC-centered paradigm into something else. (In this regard, would not be surprised if most Term Two business is conducted from the Southern White House instead of the one in DC.)
His entrance to MSG last night, with Avengers entourage (probably hanging around so much for security reasons) was like a modern day King with a Court. The crowd response was massive and authentic. The event champion came to the Donald and offered him his belt and then spontaneously bowed deeply to him, a gesture not natural in American culture but as old as humanity itself.
The Donald is doing something we haven't really seen since the Camelot period. He is Making America Great Again NOW. America is rushing back into a vivid, uplifting Present, into a sense of dynamic Nowness which is the sine qua non of any leading civilization and which America hasn't collectively felt in many a weary decade. Yes, there are still battles to be fought, but what is happening right now politically is a once in a lifetime dynamic wherein it seems that, warts and all, Trump is the right man at the right time. It is on the borderline of creating sacred space, which is essential royalty which comes from the vividness of Nowness which is an altered state of consciousness we all share all the time but generally cover over with bad mental and physical habits (the stuff of esoteric spiritual method etc.).
Hence, although the danger of assassination is real via those parasites who wish to prevent this gestalt from blossoming lest it dislodge them from the host culture, I am cautiously optimistic that the somewhat surreal Avenger Team is aware of the dangerous elements in the mix and will do all they can to thwart them.
(Or maybe I just spend too much time these days reading and watching Youtubes!!)
Thanks RR. I agree with you that Trump might be a better promoter of the Zionist agenda than via his assassination. Re: his administration, I think we will see some shallow positive benefits - some portion of the southern wall built, some of the worst felon illegals expelled, some tariffs - but the three core issues will remain unaddressed: (1) the extent of illegal immigration (20 million let into the country within the past four years alone), (2) the national debt, the problem of which is intractable without revolutionary action, i.e. persistent 20% inflation is here to stay (or more) and (3) the institutionalized voter fraud (mail in ballot fraud, electronic voting Dominion fraud, ballot harvesting fraud, ballot stuffing in critical swing states, etc) remains, even if our elites allowed Trump to win this election. My last post delved into this...
I am not yet convinced it will be that vapid. But it's certainly possible. I guess we'll know in about a year's time.
One possibility is that most of the most daring Cabinet picks get blocked, then none of promised reforms transpired and the nation remains with a fake leadership class blaming the other side whilst the Powers that Be stay on top.
But I think something bigger is under way which will derail that.
One (of many) reasons I think this time it might prove different is RFKj. I find it hard to believe, again narrative-wise, that someone who uncle and father were assassinated is a shallow, performative person on the public stage. I think that, just as he actually cleaned up the Hudson River in reality going against large corporations, he will effect substantive reform in the Big Pharma Big Ag sphere which is related to all the other Big Bullshit areas. It's like if Big Pharma reform is a gut punch, the entire body with other organs and appendages will double over and begin to stagger. I am looking for substantive reform. If DOGE does even half of what Vivek regularly spells out, it's going to be a very big deal.
Again, we'll soon find out.
Interesting times!
There seem to be three challenges for DJT and DOGE: 1) Extract the current rot from the system, 2) make sure that rot can't circumvent or reform as another power column (eg., Dulles); 3) create a new transparent system with checks and balances that endures.
This comment should be expanded into a post in its own right. Very insightful!
A terrible, but plausible, possibility. I wonder about the zionist angle, though. October 7th fractured the Left along pro-Israel, pro-Palestinian lines. The scenario described in this post would almost certainly fracture the Right along zionist vs non-zionist and anti-zionist lines, and would probably push a lot of non-zionists towards an avowed anti-zionism. The Bolshevik golem is gotting away from them on the Left (and war with Iran would hasten that process), and this would destroy the Right, meaning that a very pro-Palestine Bolshevik Left would probably become politically dominant throughout the West. Israel would be cooked. (But ... the Central Banksters are a different story, and I guess that's what this all ultimately comes down to.)
Thank you for the article; I couldn't quite square why globohomo would attempt to assassinate Trump but then let him win the election, but this explains it quite well. One thing I would caution against is assuming that the goal of the war is to create a Greater Israel of some sorts. The Israeli government is as ineffective in advocating for the interests of Jews as the United States Government is in advocating for the interests of its citizens. For more information, check out this article by the ardent Zionist Baruch Hasofer on the Israeli deep state, and their reactions to the right's attempt to partially release Globohomo's yoke on them: https://postkahanism.substack.com/p/you-think-were-the-left-were-not. (His substack is quite an interesting read)
I am not the biggest fan of Israel, but I think that Globohomo fears even the slightest hint of nationalism as opposed to globalism in any country, particularly Israel.
Thanks vlui, I'll check out the link. I agree with you that our international elites oppress the Israeli population just like it oppresses nationalism everywhere else; we can see this in that Israel force-vaccinated it's Jewish population (but not the Muslims) harder than anywhere else on earth: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe378b866-4a84-4b7f-a666-d97b3a099b58_3400x2400.png
I delved into the complicated relationship between Jews and the central bank owners here: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-complicated-relationship-between
I suspect they do have big plans for him
He's got to oversee WWIII, greater israel is in motion and the rebuilding of the temple .
And the final move will be getting a true UN and World Court, in Jerusalem . The Ben Gurion Prophecy - 1963
Globohomo can do nothing
Ther war on anti-semitism is the job Trump was made for
Zion has his back
Rothchild approved
Sounds plausible. Very much in line with how things work these days.
Interesting theory but highly unlikely. Both Jews and Christians view DJT as a messianic figure. The fulfillment of their prophecies is not possible if he's dead. He's an amazing salesman and will be much more effective alive than dead at dragging us into war with Iran and squeezing the last drops out of the american empire.
https://israel365news.com/397766/midrash-hints-that-trump-will-return-glory-to-western-world-by-building-third-temple/
Who would you attribute the assassination attempts to under this perspective?
Don't have an attribution. Some things are just difficult to know with high confidence. For example, the physical means by which the towers were brought down on 9/11.
I think the assassination attempts are similar in that they are primarily public mind manipulation events. The imagery on screens is primary. The physical world is used like a set with props to create that imagery. Look how the regular agents were swapped out for more photogenic ones and the cameramen were moved into position before the shooting (foreknowledge).
It's like the moon landing pictures. In many instances, they eschewed sticking to realistic lighting and physics to go for the perfect shot and interesting visuals.
I havn't seen regular agents being swapped out for more photogenic ones or that cameramen were moved into position (other than per standard practice in rallies) - any links on this? And if they are primarily public mind manipulation events, how would you explain the dead Trump supporter and the seriously wounded others?
Aside from that, I agree with you generally that we are in an era where underlying events don't really even have to happen - it's all about manipulating public perception. Baudrillard called this conception hyperreality (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality ) , and I'll likely cover him in the future...
The wonderful movie Wag the Dog, which I hadn't seen in twenty years, also covers this concept: https://substack.com/@neofeudalism/note/c-74061980
Different detail:
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/bombshell-secret-service-replaced-trumps-permanent-detail-with-temporary-agents-for-butler-rally/
Foreknowledge:
https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/trump-shot-new-angles:d
Thanks for the links. The different detail can be seen as replacing experienced agents with inexperienced agents (easier to attempt the assassination), or instead replacing regular agents with corrupted agents with some knowledge for the plan. Re: the Odysee clip, why would photographers be placed behind the candidate instead of in front of the candidate in the first place? Seems strange, not good angles for photos. And the guy who took the famous Trump fist-pump photo came up after the attack, he's not the guy featured in the Odysee clip: https://x.com/dvdaltizer/status/1812334187292086601
I appreciated this post looking at the forensics of the attack at the time: https://jdanielsawyer.substack.com/p/how-to-evaluate-a-false-flag-claim
Yes important to recall what Col Fletcher Prouty said about JFK assassination. All they had to do was loosen security and the rest would take care of itself. Note Jill Biden and Allegheny County College pres, where Crooks graduated, knew each other.
Yes, high speed cameras were used next to the stage to catch the bullet in flight.
Crooks' was moved out of the county and autopsy performed by zionist recently returned from Israel, FBI engaged Israeli company to get into Crooks' phone, scene controlled by governor Shapiro, Iran blamed. So it's obvious who was behind it. But we're supposed to believe these same people want to knock off Zion Don but failed? Very unlikely.
All those things you mention, if true, can easily just be described as the clean-up operation so information doesn't point to the security state. They did the same thing with overseeing every aspect of their Kennedy assassination.
Re: "failure", we've discussed this previously but it's hard to do a "grassy knoll" multiple-shooter attempt in an era of ubiquitous phone and security camera surveillance; much easier to use an MKUltra victim. And I have still not heard an adequate "fake assassination attempt" theory that adequately explains the dead Trump guy in the audience and multiple other Trump attendees seriously wounded.
I don't get granular with such things preferring to just survey on the narrative level to see what fits well, much like when grading a movie. My first thought of course was that this was a setup somehow but as far as I can tell, unless they have microdrones the size of ants which could have zinged Trump's ear making him believe he got hit at the same time that some bullets whizzed by which all heard (and which hit some bystanders, killing one), Trump would have had to be in on the act, possibly nicking his own ear with a concealed blade along one fingernail (not hard to pull off) or some such.
And I just don't see him going along with such a thing if for no other reason that several others would know about it and he would never know if he could trust them to keep the secret or not and would thus be just another puppet. He may have made some questionable alliances with both material and other forces to win this election, but I doubt he would consent to puppet hood. Just doesn't fit his narrative arc.
My two cents.
I doubt Crooks was killed. More like he is living in Europe with a beard and somebody else involuntarily provided a lookalike body. Like with JFK whose corpse was played by a local cop killed around the same time as the President and whose nickname in the station was 'JFK 2' (or some such, don't recall it precisely). How many revealing facts about the attempt have been forthcoming now several months later? Am not aware of any, so clearly this was an inside job and the ones investigating are covering up, which is par for the course in such matters.
The argument is specious. Joe Biden is president until January 20, 2015. It would be Biden's war. If Trump is dead on January 20, there is no guarantee JD Vance would become president even then. This unprecedented circumstance would invoke a constitutional crisis. Neither Vance nor Kamala Harris would be next in line. The president may well be Mike Johnson, speaker of the house, until a new election could be held. The Supreme Court may well have to decide. The US could hardly be engaging in a major war with Iran with all this going on. The Deep State may well have missed the boat.
Globohomo could own the nationalists if they can get Trump to go full Hitler
Don't tell RFK
Their motive? Israel’s much touted Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, who ruled that country from its inception in 1948 until he resigned on June 16, 1963, was so enraged at John F. Kennedy for not allowing Israel to become a nuclear power that, Collins asserts, in his final days in office he commanded the Mossad to become involved in a plot to kill America’s president.
Ben-Gurion was so convinced that Israel’s very survival was in dire jeopardy that in one of his final letters to JFK he said, “Mr. President, my people have the right to exist, and this existence is in danger.”
In the days leading up to Ben-Gurion’s resignation from office, he and JFK had been involved in an unpublicized, contentious debate over the possibility of Israel getting nuclear capabilities. Their disagreement eventually escalated into a full-fledged war of words that was virtually ignored in the press. Ethan Bronner wrote about this secret battle between JFK and Ben-Gurion years later in a New York Times article on October 31, 1998, calling it a “fiercely hidden subject.” In fact, the Kennedy/Ben-Gurion conversations are still classified by the United States Government. Maybe this is the case because Ben-Gurion’s rage and frustration became so intense – and his power so great within Israel – that Piper contends it was at the center of the conspiracy to kill John Kennedy. This stance is supported by New York banker Abe Feinberg, who describes the situation as such: “Ben-Gurion could be vicious, and he had such a hatred of the old man [Joe Kennedy, Sr., JFK’s father].” Ben-Gurion despised Joe Kennedy because he felt that not only was he an anti-Semite, but that he had also sided with Hitler during the 1930’s and 40’s. [We will touch upon this aspect of the story in an upcoming article entitled The CIA and Organized Crime: Two Sides of the Same Coin].
I still think there is a chance he could full Hitler
They can't rebuild the temple until they get about 2 million more Jews to greater israel per the Chabad
Hitlers are good at getting Jews to palestine
How do you see him going “full Hitler” when his announced cabinet is perhaps the most pro-Zionist cabinet in U.S. history and his grandchildren are all Jewish?
Globohomo could make it happen if they spread anti semitism
It is also naked self interest. The Milley's and Strozak's of the world must be feeling some unease.
I think too, there were too many people watching this time. If they stole it it might have resulted in civil war and the destruction of their basis or power.
I think that is just as likely, if they kill Trump. My instinct would be open season on globohomo elite.
The SS snipers were being fired on from the trees and that's who likely shot bystanders as they are all lined up. Coincidentally a large tractor was parked in same line directly in front of Trump protecting him.
Meanwhile arch zionist and 9/11 person of interest Howard Lutnick is the guy actually running things and making these appointments. To think they want their long time asset Trump dead just as he's about to give them their war is a cope.
I have looked at the layout previously and yes, a tractor blocked the line of sight from the water tower so no second sniper from that position. If you have layout evidence otherwise you want to present, I’m open to seeing it.
Yes, Lutnick leads Trump’s transition team. Trump’s philosophy is “peace through strength” - he had John Bolton as his NSA and Pompeo at State in his first term, for examples. But this can easily be co-opted to “strength through strength” if he is killed.
But sure, it’s entirely possible that Trump gives Israel their Iran war even with him alive. We’ll see…