Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James J. O'Meara's avatar

Thanks to Substack, we have access to sensible views like yours, Rolo's and Slavsquat's; otherwise we'd have to rely on the finkelthink narratives of MSM/Z-anon.

And kudos for quoting from Vidal's Julian. Your remarks on Caesar remind me that in Creating Christ, the authors observe that when Caesar met opposition or betrayal, and won, he would offer clemency; the defeated party would join him, grateful for being spared and looking forward to sharing in the future loot. (But there were no second chances, you'd be ruthlessly eliminated at the first sign of disloyalty; no "forgive your brother 70 time 7 times"). In this way Caesar built a base of power, gaining more and more allies, and gained the adulation of the people.

I guess things didn't work out so well with him and the Senate, but consider that the Senate's triumph was short lived, and emperors that followed used Caesar's own name as a title. Not a bad legacy. In fact, the authors go into this in order to argue that Julius Caesar (JC) was the real life model that the myth of Jesus Christ (JC) was based on. Whether or not that holds water, they do make a case that the Roman world was not a world of ruthless "blond beasts" that was either (1) taught morality by the loving Christians , as the latter would say, or (2) destroyed by a religion of slave morality, as Nietzsche and a lot of "alt right" types would say. History is complicated!

Expand full comment
Hugh Hunter's avatar

Shakespeare, of course, captures this sense of being at one of the junctures of history in his play Julius Caesar, although these lines belong to Brutus:

There is a tide in the affairs of men

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound in shallows and in miseries.

On such a full sea are we now afloat,

And we must take the current when it serves

Or lose our ventures.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts