Hard disagree with your last paragraph. Wokism is metastasized, but it is an exterminationist religion far more extreme than Christianity. Christianity is universalist in its actual form: it destroys all other religions but does not target people for their race. Wokism, on the other hand, demands Whites be completely exterminated. They give Whites no way out except to crush them, and more and more Whites are waking up to this fact. The Rhodesians held off against overwhelming odds, it was only the enmity of the other White nations that lost them the Bush War. Even outnumbered, Whites will put up an enormous fight when their backs are put against the wall and will probably win.
Hi Cernel, yes, I agree with you that wokism is an exterminationist religion; one of the points of covering Julian was to draw parallels between the exterminationalism of Christianity against Hellenism to that of wokism against whites. I also agree with you that white ethnic identity is increasing as it becomes a smaller and more discriminated against portion of the population.
I am more pessimistic in my assessment than you, though, because (1) you assume that whites will monolithically rise up against globohomo, when, like Rhodesia, a white American uprising would be brutally opposed by a large minority of leftist whites in power (see how the Boers were defeated by the British in the second Boer war; they basically starved to death the Boer women and children in concentration camps. When it comes to leftist-white on rightist-white fighting, they fight brutally and no-holds-barred, unlike any of the two-hands-tied-behind-back type of fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, etc); and (2) such an uprising would have zero institutional or foreign support, and successful uprisings in modern history require either institutional or foreign support.
The fundamental reason why the left is more extreme than the right is that the left is animated by a positive vision of future which justify any method. The right (apart from a few) have no such vision that might animates their own will to power. In fact, they fear power and authority themselves for all the cant about a need for order. They are too philosophical, thinking that debate and reason is all that is required. The left focused on indoctrination and organizing and patronage, they get dirty.
But their biggest roadblock is their doctrine of fallen nature and End Times. They think all men are irredeemable and the only solution is Jesus and to wait for the Second Coming. As a result, they think willfulness is a sin and that to try to improve things is doomed.
History is far more fluid than habitual doomers wanted to admit, because it implied that they do have a power to change things. To avoid this responsibility they’ll play up the big scale and complexity of problems. But a leader would focus on cutting up the elephant and assign parts to the competent in terms of priorities. As Peter Thiel pointed out in his “Zero to One”, the first step is to dominate a small niche market first to build up resources and to go from here to there. The purpose of studying history is to not despair, but to understand man’s nature, his needs and wants, and the various strategies, and how and why they either succeed or fail in certain circumstances.
Start small. Focus on mastering one area. If you think you will fail, you will. If you think you will succeed, you will, because a positive confidence is infectious and attracts driven men to your side. After all, Romulus have to start with just an bull and heifer and a plow first.
Great article. The big difference between woke religion and ancient Christians was birthrate. The Pagans pointed to the higher Christian birthrate. Compare the low birthrate of the woke to the Mennonites.
"thirty years of wealth and power" - Christianity became corrupt like the Jerusalem Temple. Arguably, Julian fought a similar battle that Christ did.
"religious freedom to all" - Julian granted freedom to real Christians.
Persians were monotheists and believed in Heaven for the good and Hell for the evil. The Zoroastrians religion was corrupt by this time, though.
Wokeness is really a Central Banker-created and fueled ideological tool of subversion in the war on the West. It is the Bankers' Tribe waging ethnic war on Whites, so will not die of its own accord, as it will be fueled by their tools -- mass media, investment funds, government and politicians, academia and education.
We'll either have to see the rise of a great cultural and political movement that successfully opposes the Bankers' Tribe, or we will drift into a collapse and period of chaos where the Tribe will attempt to keep us indefinitely.
I hope that we see the quality of leadership we need to successfully escape in the coming years. Life will be very bleak for humanity if we fail.
Hard disagree with your last paragraph. Wokism is metastasized, but it is an exterminationist religion far more extreme than Christianity. Christianity is universalist in its actual form: it destroys all other religions but does not target people for their race. Wokism, on the other hand, demands Whites be completely exterminated. They give Whites no way out except to crush them, and more and more Whites are waking up to this fact. The Rhodesians held off against overwhelming odds, it was only the enmity of the other White nations that lost them the Bush War. Even outnumbered, Whites will put up an enormous fight when their backs are put against the wall and will probably win.
Hi Cernel, yes, I agree with you that wokism is an exterminationist religion; one of the points of covering Julian was to draw parallels between the exterminationalism of Christianity against Hellenism to that of wokism against whites. I also agree with you that white ethnic identity is increasing as it becomes a smaller and more discriminated against portion of the population.
I am more pessimistic in my assessment than you, though, because (1) you assume that whites will monolithically rise up against globohomo, when, like Rhodesia, a white American uprising would be brutally opposed by a large minority of leftist whites in power (see how the Boers were defeated by the British in the second Boer war; they basically starved to death the Boer women and children in concentration camps. When it comes to leftist-white on rightist-white fighting, they fight brutally and no-holds-barred, unlike any of the two-hands-tied-behind-back type of fighting in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, etc); and (2) such an uprising would have zero institutional or foreign support, and successful uprisings in modern history require either institutional or foreign support.
The fundamental reason why the left is more extreme than the right is that the left is animated by a positive vision of future which justify any method. The right (apart from a few) have no such vision that might animates their own will to power. In fact, they fear power and authority themselves for all the cant about a need for order. They are too philosophical, thinking that debate and reason is all that is required. The left focused on indoctrination and organizing and patronage, they get dirty.
But their biggest roadblock is their doctrine of fallen nature and End Times. They think all men are irredeemable and the only solution is Jesus and to wait for the Second Coming. As a result, they think willfulness is a sin and that to try to improve things is doomed.
History is far more fluid than habitual doomers wanted to admit, because it implied that they do have a power to change things. To avoid this responsibility they’ll play up the big scale and complexity of problems. But a leader would focus on cutting up the elephant and assign parts to the competent in terms of priorities. As Peter Thiel pointed out in his “Zero to One”, the first step is to dominate a small niche market first to build up resources and to go from here to there. The purpose of studying history is to not despair, but to understand man’s nature, his needs and wants, and the various strategies, and how and why they either succeed or fail in certain circumstances.
Start small. Focus on mastering one area. If you think you will fail, you will. If you think you will succeed, you will, because a positive confidence is infectious and attracts driven men to your side. After all, Romulus have to start with just an bull and heifer and a plow first.
Fascinating read. Thank you.
Great article. The big difference between woke religion and ancient Christians was birthrate. The Pagans pointed to the higher Christian birthrate. Compare the low birthrate of the woke to the Mennonites.
"thirty years of wealth and power" - Christianity became corrupt like the Jerusalem Temple. Arguably, Julian fought a similar battle that Christ did.
"religious freedom to all" - Julian granted freedom to real Christians.
Persians were monotheists and believed in Heaven for the good and Hell for the evil. The Zoroastrians religion was corrupt by this time, though.
Wokeness is really a Central Banker-created and fueled ideological tool of subversion in the war on the West. It is the Bankers' Tribe waging ethnic war on Whites, so will not die of its own accord, as it will be fueled by their tools -- mass media, investment funds, government and politicians, academia and education.
We'll either have to see the rise of a great cultural and political movement that successfully opposes the Bankers' Tribe, or we will drift into a collapse and period of chaos where the Tribe will attempt to keep us indefinitely.
I hope that we see the quality of leadership we need to successfully escape in the coming years. Life will be very bleak for humanity if we fail.
Imagination is mans weapon in the war against reality
Zeus is the god of the abrahamics, plato is the god of communism... Hellene is a stubborn bitch. She never went away
No more animal sacrifice... not to fear we can be sacrificed in their stead. Sacrifice never ends. Much like the animals we sacrifice to eat