41 Comments
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

I've been thinking about that Black Rock commercial more lately. What are the chances that this ready-made conspiracy has a connection to this company ALSO at the center of so much conspiracy research? This guy wasn't just in the background of some local news report about the local high school... but a Black Rock commercial? Weird right?

If it were possible to know the people involved in that commercial, it would be interesting to know their connections. Wouldn't surprise me if elite-connected branding agencies play some role in funneling kids of a certain profile to the FBI in the same way that talent agencies funnel tweens to Hollywood pedophile networks.

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

Incompetence, eh? So many "mistakes." So many "anomalies." An untrained 20-year-old dweeb outsmarted the secret service and was left alone unchallenged until he was able to fire off eight rounds. They knew about a threat and still allowed Trump to take the stage and speak. Ask yourself: What are the odds? There was so much "incompetence" that plausible deniability goes out the windows in any legitimate inquiry. But we all know, nothing will happen and nobody will be held accountable. I wonder why? 🙄

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

I approve of the general project to delimit the shape of a potential conspiracy. I strongly believe it needs to follow a variant of Hanlon's Law (is it) and only attribute to conspiracy what cannot be explained by incompetence. And to seek not the maximum but the minimum amount of conspiracy that is consistent with the known facts and events. On the USSS side all that is needed is for someone to have ordered "local police to secure buildings from the inside". That's it. Any more is unnecessary embellishment. USSS presence was already low tier because it was at ex POTUS level, not nominee level, not current POTUS level. Everyone who thinks they should have shot Crooks at T-60 or T-19 or T-1 is engaging in post hoc argument and ignoring the facts of the Rules of Engagement because they don't like them. They are fact. If you prove a conspiracy by ignoring facts, you didn't prove what you think you proved. The RoE are to not shoot unless there is a positive hostile ID or the target is firing. That's what happened. Everyone did their job right. They were working to ID the guy, deconflict him, and ran out of time. If you think you would have done different then you are the hypothetical murderer of a plain clothes deputy. And you're going down for it because you broke the RoE. And yes maybe they should have got Trump off the stage earlier or not let him go on, but do you really have the stones to make that potentially career ending move based on incomplete information? Turning to the grooming side, I agree FBI methods would be used, and grooming contacts would be excised from the record. As this is not a sting leading to a bust, but an act of rreason, actual FBI could not be used. But deniable ghost operatives familiar with the methods, would be used, as in all similar type of off books operations going back at least to the 60s. Otherwise I agree with how the patsy is acquired and deployed.

Expand full comment
Jul 19Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

Who set the RoE, when, and why, could be relevant questions. And I don't see delaying Trump's entrance due to security concerns as a controversial or career ending move. Political speakers start late all the time.

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

I agree about SS most likely just doing their jobs under current protocols, while not having enough manpower due to their DEI director. Furthermore, the last assassination attempt was 40 years ago - the protocol may change now, but it's not surprising that it was a lot more relaxed leading up to this point.

To expand further on these theories - here is an interesting bit - the use of 3 weapons.

https://eadaily.com/en/news/2024/07/15/at-the-time-of-the-assassination-attempt-trump-was-shot-with-three-types-of-weapons-experts

There is another video with shadowy figure at the water tower - https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1813964308788965741

and witness testimonies - https://x.com/realDailyTrite/status/1813160851555148059

Grooming could have been done by any number of organizations - CIA/FBI/Mossad/Ukraine/etc.

Look for motive -

Expand full comment

/rreason/treason

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

"The most disturbing feat of propaganda has been the transformation of common sense into fringe conspiracy theory"

"...using the language of common sense while at the same time canceling the presupposition on which commonsense terms depend for their meaning. This trick can be played on almost any area of human thinking..."

Roger Scruton, On Human Nature (2017)

Expand full comment

Another point that's been made: how did the USSS know so quickly that the threat was neutralized?

They didn't have the surrounding buildings covered. How would they know immediately that there wasn't another shooter.

Now there are reports that there might have been another shooter on the water tower. Of course the video is grainy and looks like a Bigfoot sighting, but still, it's possible that someone was up there. It's possible that the person on the water tower was USSS. Who knows.

The whole thing stinks, and doesn't jibe with the reality of the situation.

It makes me think Afghanistan exit all over again. Incompetence doesn't work anymore. You can't be incompetent, repeatedly, in a way that benefits a particular set of benefactors.

It's like winning the lottery twice, and losing the tickets both times. Meanwhile the same person finds the missing ticket each time and cashes them in.

Expand full comment
Jul 20·edited Jul 20Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

>>>>>>Crooks apparently had a “limited” online presence according to authorities.<<<<<<

We are also told that Crooks had a clean criminal record. -no social media footprints - had no ID on him - nevertheless WITHIN 8 hours from the criminal event the FBI - Special Agent Kevin Rojek - used his DNA to identify him.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-rally-gunman-identified/

That is pure unadulterated bullshit.

Expand full comment
Jul 18·edited Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2024/07/investigative-reports/the-man-behind-trumps-vp-pick-its-worse-than-you-think/

About Trump's VP and the rest of folks behind him.

You might want to investigate the merger of Trump's truth social - with a dodgy company. Trump will get 3.5 billion out of that deal - even though truth social was on the verge of bankruptcy at the time of merger.

Technocrats are filled with joy - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-15/why-jd-vance-as-trump-s-vp-pick-has-silicon-valley-celebrating

Is there a genuine conflict between the technocrats that bought Trump and the Biden's handlers? Or is it all a theater for the masses? From what I gather, they (Biden's handlers and technocrats) are all from the same tribe.

Expand full comment
Jul 18·edited Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

Good contribution to the "independent investigation." Maybe the bad guys had to take their chances with the single, deranged shooter to avoid any more aroma of a conspiracy. It's bad enough. I wonder what was going through Trump's mind. "Get on your feet, raise your fist, and galvanize your supporters!" Sure. What about, "Show yourself and that your wound is minor before the SS stuff you back into the limo."

Expand full comment

I believe the second one. He's a very sharp-minded guy, used to dealing with some seriously ruthless people both in business and in politics and often needing to think on his feet. I think it would have occurred to him pretty quickly 'this was an attempt on my life, if I don't show that this is a minor injury now, then I'm going to "die from my injuries" in hospital later on'.

Probably not thought out in a full sentence like that but the instinct to do so was there.

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

Hats off to you for doing the dirty work for us. I've not followed this very closely. I haven't watched ANY MSM news media of any kind for decades. At most the occasional short clip from X or YouTube. But someone posted along the lines of (paraphrasing) "why have none of Crooks' family said a word" and the like. Very good question, it seems.

This made me think that if people who knew him well were to start succumbing to a series of car accidents, armed robberies, unexpected strokes and heart attacks, plain old disappearing never to be heard of again -- in relatively rapid succession and a time period of unlikely short duration -- well that would make me wonder. Imagine there will never again be anything like all the people involved in the JFK assassination who did not live to a ripe old age.

Expand full comment
Jul 22Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

Don't forget Lee Harvey Oswald was groomed by the CIA. He learned to speak fluent Russian while stationed on a CIA U2 base in Japan, he later "defected" to the USSR among myriad facts that make no sense for a US Marine.

The UNAbomber was fashioned by a CIA pychologist using liberal doses of LSD and manipulation.

These are some of the more well known, higher profile examples. I'm sure they have been tweaking their progamming and one result of AI will be to "harvest" recruits rapidly for still more "unusual experiments" .

I have little faith the Crooks boy acted on his own reasoning, for his own purposes, more likely he was influenced into his actions, its telling he was seeking to enroll in a University program in the fall of 2024. He made a bomb without leaving any internet search trace, he may have help on this as well. There are shadows of fingerprints, curious events that can be shrugged away, these are the hallmarks of our tax dollar funded spy agencies.

Expand full comment
author

I agree with you, Garth. Nice comment.

Expand full comment

From experience, the grooming went from fake synchronicity to annoying interference and then overt targeting with physical attacks once I became aware and started laying traps while breaking the 4th wall during scripted, operant conditioning episodes ie. Use of fear anchors. I played the wounded bird to find out why, how and who may be involved but ended up falling into a dark place that took personal recovery and a complete psychic change to reverse course. Before I hit bottom I visited the field office to report the targetting and their guys said "the socialists are trying to recruit you." Hostile encounters are less frequent with healthier routines and now I view the phenomena as a form of "trauma based personality change." The search led me to egregores, archons and the Demiurge. Precognitive abilities and synchronicities offer opportunities for nonlinear progress, service work and spiritual discernment and are still common post initiation without the fear factor which I believe is/was the purpose altho I doubt these individuals actors ie. Organic portals are aware of their role in the positive transformation.

Expand full comment
Jul 19Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

Probably also worth mentioning (alongside the stock shorts) the German government dumping loads of Bitcoin in the weeks prior. The Biden regime has been waging open war on crypto, whereas Trump is very pro-crypto, so I imagine BTC woulda crashed had the assassination attempt been successful. This all shows foreknowledge and it appears to have been planned at high levels of the globohomo governments.

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

And Wtf is up with the globohomo Republican national convention with pagan prayers and face tattoos?

Expand full comment

The RNC should only do Hebrew prayers. This is America after all!

Expand full comment

And labor union leaders.

(Maybe the answer is "RINOs")

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

Crooks was in a Blackrock ad from 2022. The ad has been taken down.

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

Excellent analysis. Very strange that we’ve not heard a statement from the parents (to my knowledge). If this happened to my child I would be livid and very vocal about it. It’s heartbreaking from a parents point of view ( *a normal parent, you never know).

Expand full comment
Jul 20·edited Jul 20Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

I'm new here and I'm liking very much your site. Just an observation, why are you still using Google or Bing when you should be using privacy and secure search engines like DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Searx and other opensource ones.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks notlurking. DuckDuckGo unfortunately engages in search censorship results and is compromised (its CEO Gabriel Weinberg, for example, announced that it was going to down-rank sites that spread so-called “Russian disinformation”), and their search results aren’t very good. I’m not familiar with the other two. I’ve heard Yandex isn’t bad.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/11/technology/duckduckgo-russia-disinformation.html

Expand full comment
Jul 20·edited Jul 20

Article by The New York Times...come on bro...most articles by them needs to take with a grain of salt...sometimes useful info from them but most of the times with a slant for the powers that be...they are part of it...

Expand full comment
author

Is it your position that if a person is quoted in a liberal publication, that the person quoted did not actually make the statement? Here is Weinberg's archived Tweet:

"Like so many others I am sickened by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the gigantic humanitarian crisis it continues to create. #StandWithUkraine️️

At DuckDuckGo, we've been rolling out search updates that down-rank sites associated with Russian disinformation."

https://archive.ph/g2eL9

In a statement, Kamyl Bazbaz, the vice president of communications for DuckDuckGo, said that the affected sites were engaged in “active disinformation campaigns,” meaning they were similar to other low-quality websites already penalized by search algorithms.

“This isn’t censorship, it’s just search rankings,” he said.

Expand full comment
Jul 19Liked by Neoliberal Feudalism

"Cheadle would rather have it thought that she and the Secret Service generally were incompetent (which is not totally implausible given she had a DEI goal of 30% of Secret Service agents be women by 2030) versus the attack was an intentional conspiracy,"

Exactly!!

https://myriadmike.substack.com/p/assassination-conspiracy-theyre-fooling?publication_id=1576281&post_id=146789559&isFreemail=false&r=hhrl0&triedRedirect=true

Expand full comment