Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ziggy's avatar

AUTHOR: "only a strong monarch,... has the power to keep oligarchical monopoly formation in check." See the English Civil War, also fought in America. Kings lost their power because they replaced the nobility with a King controlled army, which made sense at the time, but the paid armies turned. If you compare pictures of nobles between the 14th and 18th, you will see they went from rugged to faggoty dressed in Whigs and silk, because nobles no longer had a martial obligation or could fight for titles. The Christian Knighthoods were like the Iranian Basij, which protected Christianity, became high society clubs.

Expand full comment
Fabius Minarchus's avatar

The Fed is partly nationalized. Yes, the Fed governors have an unconstitutional level of independence form the President, but the Treasury gets the profits from the Fed. When the Treasury borrows from the Fed, it is an accounting fiction. It is no different than simply printing greenbacks.

Other than that, your article is spot on.

The real challenge is how to back out of this system.

To some degree we made a partial backout by creating FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC. For the most part, home loans are no longer financed by bank deposits. Banks are just sales fronts and bill collectors. (On the downside, while this reduces the amount of maturity transformation, it does fuzz up the issue of skin in the game. Witness 2008. And it centralizes too much activity in Wall St. In theory, it would be possible for community banks to finances mortgages without maturity transformation https://conntects.net/blogPosts/GreenandFree/68/Mortgages-Without-Maturity-Transformation )

Expand full comment
46 more comments...

No posts