The intentional implosion of California is the (almost? already?) completed blueprint for national destruction

A simple math problem.

This post looks at how California was transformed from a solid Republican state to a supermajority Democrat state solely through mass illegal immigration, and how the establishment is using the same strategy now on a national level.

The Durham report has been released. Despite it attacking globohomo for the Spygate fraud, it itself served as a limited hangout.¹ It’s nice that this time they didn’t swap out a fake executive summary to contradict the internal text of the report², which they do as standard practice knowing that almost no one will read more than the executive summary, and which gives the media cover to report on that basis; that’s what they did on the previously released Horowitz report, which I had wasted my time reading.

There’s been a bit of embarrassing toothless mea culpa’s and apologies by some of the uncharged-criminal-actors (including by the FBI, which recently stated they would not comply with Congressional demands for document production), but mostly silence from the establishment and a collective shrug. It was classy how CNN put on-air fired and disgraced (but with reinstated pension) Spygate Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe to opine on the criminality he himself substantially contributed to within the report (Honk!). Meanwhile the southern border is completely open and the media is ignoring it, also with a collective shrug. Chomsky and Leon Botstein received hundreds of thousands of dollars from Epstein and they barely defend themselves, using excuses that are nonsensical on their face (“I didn’t know how to send a bank wire so he helped me send one!”). The White House openly mocks the majority population by highlighting photos such as this despite Jews making up 2.4% of the population. Globohomo just released an asinine, smug fake-poll showing Biden would beat Trump by an even wider margin if the election was held today despite, per CNN, Biden holding the second lowest approval rating of any president in the past 70 years. I could rattle off another easy dozen examples.

What we are seeing, essentially, is an establishment that no longer has any fear of the general population. It no longer feels the need to hold out false-hope of promised justice to the masses or even for their messaging to make sense. It feels confident that it has crushed the Trump movement, neutered Trump himself with nonsensical criminal charges pending in New York that even liberals won’t defend (calling it a “novel legal theory”)³, and destroyed populism in general — and it has no fear of other government institutions either. All institutional power has been corrupted and co-opted from the military⁴, to the FBI, CIA, NSA and DOJ, to federal prosecutors, to local prosecutors, to the police (which acts as an establishment enforcement arm against whites and populism at this point), to the media, to universities and schooling, to all social media companies including Musk-owned Twitter, to the medical establishment, to the election process itself, to the judiciary and Congress, and there are no holdouts remaining at this time. China and Russia are both globohomo protectorates with Rothschild owned central banks; the over-arching agenda is back on track after Orange Man’s surprising 2016 win, and it’s back to business as normal. So who cares if there are some media or governmental reports detailing the extent of it’s fraud? Nothing will come of it.

What we are watching play out on the federal level now was conducted previously in a test case with California. The establishment likes to run test cases to iron out any problems before rolling out an otherwise risky strategy on a large scale; that’s why they gave the green-light for the cryptocurrency experiment, for example, in order to test CBDCs before rolling them out worldwide (coming very soon).

So let’s discuss California, which used to be a solid Republican state, and is now a supermajority Democrat state. How did this happen, what tactics did globohomo use to achieve this, and how are they applying this nationally?

---

Background

California was a solid Republican state until the 1990s: from 1952 until 1992 its electoral votes went every election to the Republican candidate (except in 1964 with LBJ vs. Goldwater, which was a blowout election), including 3 times for Nixon and twice for Reagan. Since 1992 its electoral votes have gone to Democrats in every election, with the lopsidedness of the vote increasing in every election. 1992’s Bill Clinton received 46% of the vote, while Biden received 63%:

California’s senators were mixed for decades, with a mix of Republican and Democrat senators, usually one and one, until the early 1990s when it too went permanent Democrat.

California’s house seats always favored Democrats, electing more Democrats than Republicans since the 1960s, but the mix was fairly close. For example, in 1960 California elected 16D 14R; in 1974 23D 20R, in 1980 28D 15R, in 1994 30D 22R. Since the 2000s though the house seats have grown increasingly lopsided toward Democrats: 33D 20R (2004), 34D 19R (2008), 38D 15R (2016), 39D 14R (2018), 46D 7R (2020), 42D 11R (2022).

Even today the coastal districts containing high-population urban areas are all liberal whereas the less-populated in-land districts are almost all conservative, reflecting a worldwide urban/liberal vs rural/conservative divide:

For a different format for some of this data, see here.

The Governor’s office has been held by Democrats since 1999, with an Arnold Schwarzengger (2004-2010) blip.

The state legislature has been controlled by Democrats since the 1960s, but it too has grown more lopsided, providing the Democrats a supermajority in both state houses since 2012, allowing them, among many other things, to redistrict the state to destroy the minority Republican seats. One specific target of recent redistricting was Devin Nunes because of his public support for Donald Trump; seeing the writing on the wall despite serving since 2002, he did not run for re-election in order to go work with Trump (although his replacement managed to hold the district, barely, with a 51.5%-48.5% win).

Also of note is the fact that California has now permanent vote by mail (see the Stalin quote from Boris Bazhanov’s book, "I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how"). In the 2018 legislative elections and 2016 presidential election liberals strenuously fought against any signature matching, and the California signature rejection rate was 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively, but they flipped and demanded the opposite in the 2022 Recall Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon effort, which failed because of rigid signature matching where 30% of signatures were thrown out. They will say anything, do anything, it doesn’t matter how hypocritical, whatever gets them more power.

We can conclude then, with confidence, that California has a one party state government, with supermajority control from Democrats, and the trend is only toward even-further control.

---

How did this happen?

Well, this part is easy. The answer is simply due to one factor and one factor only: changing demographics.

Here’s the census data 1960-2010:

The white percentage of the population decreased from 66.6% of the population in 1980 to 40.1% of the population in 2010. Here’s the 2020 census data, which drops the non-hispanic white population further to 35.2%. It is likely far lower than that due to illegal immigrants who do not fill out census data; according to a study by scholars at MIT and Yale, there are over 10 million illegal immigrants in California.

Per NPR, “The majority of white voters have voted for Republicans in presidential elections going back to the 1960s.”

Alternatively, hispanics as a class are pretty liberal. They vote at minimum vote 58% Democrat in national elections; the highest Hispanic vote for a Republican was to George W. Bush in 2004 when he got 40-42% of their vote (by promising free housing with no credit checks that later caused the 2008 financial crisis, pushing for amnesty, and by playing up his fake-Texan cowboy shtick and “compassionate conservatism”):

Therefore, it’s a simple math problem: by dramatically increasing the number of non-whites in an area one can ensure a supermajority one party state that will last, theoretically, forever.

Now, many Californians did see the problem coming and tried to put a stop to it by decreasing the attractiveness of the state to illegal immigrants, despite actions like Reagan’s betrayal of his base with his 1986 illegal immigration amnesty which greatly incentivized further illegal immigration (Reagan’s status as a hero of the right, including to Trump, just shows how ideologically confused the right is⁵). Californians passed 1994’s Proposition 187 by a wide majority (58% to 42%) which would have prevented illegals from using non-emergency public services, but it was struck down by globohomo-controlled courts. The judge who issued the permanent injunction overruling the will of the population had one of the usual "early life" wikipedia entries (under education and career).

---

What have Democrats done with their supermajority?

Let’s check off some of the Democrat accomplishments in the state of California with their supermajority.

• Per the Public Policy Institute of California, the gap between high- and low-income families in California is among the largest in the nation—exceeding all but three other states in 2021 (the latest data available). Families at the top of the income distribution earned 11 times more than families at the bottom ($291,000 vs. $26,000 for the 90th and 10th percentiles, respectively). In 1980, families at the top earned 7 times more than those at the bottom, and the current gap reflects 63% income growth for the 90th percentile, and 7% growth for the 10th percentile over four decades.

• That, despite California already having among the highest taxes in the nation.

• Despite the highest taxes in the nation, California’s budget deficit is the worst among the 50 states at $32 billion, with the greatest debt load in the country, requiring massive federal bailouts. See also the NY Post article, “Massive $1.9 trillion bill is a bailout for blue states”.

• A new study shows California public schools ranking #44 among the 50 states. Having over ten million illegal immigrants who do not pay taxes but utilize public services has eviscerated the quality of public services, including schools, hospitals, roads, and much else.

• California schools are teaching children extreme anti-white grievances; see their Department of Education recommended reading list with classic books banned and IQ tests for black students banned. They have also passed a required Black Lives Matter school week for schools. In 2019 new sex ed guidelines encourage teachers to talk to students about gender identity and masturbation.

• California decided to revoke the medical licenses of any doctor who questioned its propaganda.

• California is pushing for $1.2 million reparations for black residents, which is meeting some resistance (for now).

• California downgraded knowingly infecting someone else with HIV from a felony to a misdemeanor. It is also passing pro-pedophelia laws.

• In 2022 Newsom signed a bill to make California a “sanctuary” for transgender child mutilation surgeries. Courts have new authority to take away parental custody of minors who have come from other states.

• In California there are no religious or personal exemptions to their vaccine mandates.

• California has among the worst air quality in the nation.

• California refuses to pass laws criminalizing fentanyl dealers.

• California has 199,000 people locked up, a higher rate than almost any democracy on earth. According to a study, California ranks 14th as the most dangerous state in America and, in 2018 had the most homicides of any state in the country. And all of this despite California having the #1 strictest gun laws in the nation.

I could go on, but hopefully you get the point. California is completely ruined despite its natural beauty, its ports for worldwide transportation and serving as a technology and military industrial complex hub. It puts Sodom and Gomorrah to shame. And keep this in mind: California’s insanity is still kept in check, to a degree, by the comparative sanity of the federal government and other states. If the federal government successfully copies the California model, as argued below, there will be nothing to keep its sanity in check and it will go off the rails at a far quicker pace, and to a much worse degree, than California has.

---

How is this California-tested strategy playing out on a national level?

The federal government has been copying the California model for many years now, and we are seeing the fruits of their efforts at this time. By opening up the southern border intentionally and swarming the country with tens of millions of Democrat-leaning voters, they plan to install a permanent Democrat majority to usher in a one party state that will last indefinitely, or at least for an extremely long time. Republican politicians go along with the agenda and serve as barking do-nothing dogs that merely attempt to slow the Democrats down, never stop them.⁶ Mitch McConnell⁷ and Kevin McCarthy know about and intentionally further this process.

It is already impossible for a Republican to win the popular vote in America (the last time was George W. Bush in 2004 due to 9/11 and war; before that 1988); soon enough (or already now due to Democrat vote fraud tactics nationally and specifically in Arizona and Georgia) it will be impossible for Republicans to win the electoral college vote too. At the very least, when Texas turns blue (which could happen at any time) it’s all over.

This is the fundamental reason why globohomo doesn’t really care how silly what they say in the press is or what you believe anymore - they feel completely in control again (although their extreme censorship efforts will continue; this pejorative Salon article explains that any free speech forum will always become right wing over time, which globohomo doesn’t want to allow).

Now, the central bank owning rulers behind globohomo may decide to keep the fake two party system going⁸ as it serves certain purposes; for example, if things get out of control too quickly then the boiling frog may jump out of the pot. But I would not be surprised for the two party system to collapse once the boomers die off and for the country to then rapidly lurch toward the leftist singularity and white genocide, making California’s actions thus far look mild by comparison, where America and western civilization will experience horrors beyond comprehension.

1. With Durham’s direct supervisor being the wife of Biden’s current National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, who was involved in Spygate criminality; and with Durham himself chosen to protect the fraudulent Mueller investigation, per Sundance.

2. Per Sundance: “First a positive note about the report.  Unlike all other reports of similar internal investigation, I will give the Durham team credit for not using the ‘executive summary’ of the report to cloud, positively shape or disguise the corruption outlined within the body of the report.  This is the first such report where the executive summary actually summarizes the scale of the corruption within the details.

Perhaps the parting message was considered, “If you are going to whitewash this s**t [ie entire govt operation], at least be intellectually honest with the American people, and not whitewash the investigation in the ‘executive summary’ of it.”  I’m pretty sure that was the exact parting phrase.  It was after that conversation [Aug 2020] when CTH then said, do not anticipate anything from Durham.  Bill Barr was the bondo, John Durham is the spray paint.”

3. Along with a $5 million civil defense verdict for being “Orange Man Bad” and more criminal charges upcoming (the Georgia grand jury forewoman is in the mold of a pussyhat wearing extremist.

A theory is that globohomo is pre-screening juries on political issues for extreme liberalism and not just relying on voir dire by using the NSA search databases to search through potential jury member beliefs beforehand. In 2023 the DOJ Inspector General revealed that more than 10,000 federal employees have access to the NSA database for surveillance inquiries (which show everything you have ever typed electronically on your computer or used on your phone), more than 3.4 million search queries were ran between 12/1/2020 and 11/30/2021, and approximately 30% were outside the rules and regulations that govern warrantless search, showing the pattern of illegal governmental behavior is extreme and only expanding. This is another tool for globohomo to, among other things, ensure the results from juries that they want.

4. The military still has decently high approval from the public, but it is declining quickly. See the Joint Chief of Staff sponsoring Alexander Vindman, appearing in full military uniform, for the impeachment of Trump for investigating globohomo corruption in Ukraine; see Mark Milley stating he would warn China if Trump was going to attack them; see the top-down degeneracy in the military (see new advertisements for the military) and see General Milley’s statement comparing “white rage” to Mao Zedong, Lenin and Marx. Also note dissidents who refused to get the COVID vaccine were purged.

5. Per James Perloff, The Shadows of Power, 145, 147-148 and 170, 172: Campaigning in 1980, Reagan said he intended to balance the budget by 1983.  However, the federal deficit actually increased from $40.2-$78.9 billion under Carter to $127.9 billion in 1982 and $208.9 billion in 1983.  He chalked up more government debt that all the Presidents before him combined.  While Congress bears some culpability for this, Reagan’s own budget proposals estimated deficits from $100-200 billion dollars.  The civilian work force in the executive branch grew by nearly 100,000 between 1981 and 1986.   He appointed more than 80 individuals to his administration who were members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or both.  When communist Poland defaulted on its interest payments to American banks, Reagan didn’t pressure Warsaw — he bailed out the banks by having the U.S. taxpayers pick up the tab.  And who could forget Reagan’s support for the 1986 illegal immigration amnesty which radically sped up the racial transformation of America?

6. In 1897 Robert Lewis Dabney, the Chief of Staff to and biographer of Stonewall Jackson, bitterly wrote about these “moderate” types and his description of their psychology applies just as much now as it did then:

It may be inferred again that the present movement for women's rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent: Northern conservatism. This is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. . . . Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always when about to enter a protest very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its bark is worse than its bite, and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent role of resistance: The only practical purpose which it now serves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it in wind, and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy, from having nothing to whip. No doubt, after a few years, when women's suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of suffrage to asses. There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position.

7. Just a couple of examples about McConnell: he refused to allow Trump to appoint any recess cabinet members; he crushed the tea party movement through machiavellian backroom strategies; his wife abuses her office to help her family firm with China business. He’s high up in the globohomo chain of command and he knows exactly what he’s doing; he’s worse than liberals because his standard approach is to knife his putative allies, the populists, in the back.

8. “Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation.  Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.  When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers.  These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.  By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.  It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished.” - Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the U.S. Bankers’ Association, New York, Idaho Leader, 26 August 1924.