yes crazy as inso far the author seems still to beLIEve there is some war or "genocide" going on LOL all these are the same. russia and UKR are the same ... they just pretend to fight a war. same like gaza and israel. i mean this must be obvious to the awake now for 2-3 yrs LOL EDIT, YES there is a real kind of "genocide" - namely of europe / europeans
Good article in overall assessment. Poor understanding in some of the particulars.
“Abrahamic religions” is word salad nonsense. Literally doesn’t exist.
The Church has been around for 2k years, and only the last 10% has been prosemitic (with outliers). Most of the rest of it has been antisemitic(with outliers. Christ was the ultimate antisemite.) This wouldn’t have happened if powerful white folks hadn’t kept the Jews around to take advantage of their funding and all, and hadn’t built cultures around mecrchantism that where taylor made for Jewish takeover. Every aspect of The West has been subverted and The Church was the last holdout. So most of the blame rests on merchants and rulers not The Church.
And your exegesis is what Jews believe not The Church. Every piece of scripture you referenced is about the victorious Church, not Jews. Every decent theologian from every Christian tradition would have told us that until post war.
Christianity is Noahidism and part of the agenda. Like a rocket shedding its boosters, it served its purpose and now the next phase begins. Clinging to past lies (like rabbi yeshua being an anti-semite) is a form of psychological cope. You believe in the same End Times prophecies, at the end of the day.
Every reasonable cosmology has Legitimate representatives and retards. Examples of Reasonable Pagans: Hendricks and Lana, Frank De Silva, Asha Logos. You represent the retards who are incapable of having human dialogue because you are so irrational about the topic you’re incapable of acting in good faith.
You are very feminine and unserious. No one called you any names. You got very vaginal very fast when your fake rabbi religion was criticized. Learn to debate facts and not feelz. Repent.
You believe that this (so-called) “rabbi yeshua” was a real life historical figure and not “mythical”? If so, you’d have to look at his parentage in order to determine his race or ethnicity. Some claim that his jewess mother was impregnated by a Roman soldier/centurion named "Panthera" (or Pandera/Pantera). If so, this “rabbi” would be of mixed race, no?
Abrahamic religions is perfectly coherent term, especially in the context he uses it in this article, as a straightforward way to describe religions that trace their spiritual lineage to Abraham.
You don't even make an argument why it's ''word salad'' -- You just seem to be triggered by it because you don't like being affiliated in any with Jews.
Well you’re one to talk. You blame the Jews for everything. You liked this article blaming Israel for the Russia-Ukraine war. Nuts. Bennett tried to negotiate peace between Russia and Ukraine!
This and the author's response are a fantastic thread I will be looking at in depth. I will just mention that in my view, the Christian theological take on those quotes is a convenient reading for them, and it's a necessity for the continuation of that faith, but has nothing to do with what the Jewish reading was and is. Like so much else that is said by the Talmudists and Zionists, the external interpretation is allowed to ride, and that is used to the originators' benefit, while the hidden (to us) interpretation is never discussed openly.
I have the idea that Jesus and other later prophets were speaking more directly to the viciousness of the first religion, than is usually discussed in today's sermons. From what I recall, their words are usually framed as speaking to humanity's tendencies, but I now suspect it was more of a direct attack on a specific set of ideas and cultural mode.
All three major abrahamic religions are organized around the Akedah, and this massively narcissistic fable is an excellent way to divorce its believers from their essential humanity, by dividing children from parents' love, and parents from their duty to protect their children.
But, the Talmudic tradition goes one further: it holds that the Jewish people dominated god through disputation, which was self-reported by the Talmudists as pleasing to god. The mode of disputation used the "word precedes the thing" construct which is said to have been how god created the material universe. This capacity for creating reality through speech was appropriated by the Talmudists or even all Judaic traditions (I'm not clear on that yet). As the two later religions did not assert that human speech has that power, they were set up to be dominated by whatever words are put into the religion. And the Jewish concept of words spoken by humans being generative was not something shared with the larger world, just as the fact of there being dual meaning in much of the speech directed outwardly was not shared. This ... well, it may or may not (depending) give direct power over Christians or Muslims, but at the least, it gives Judaic speakers more latitude in how they act, since the concept of truth is more confining for Christians and Muslims.
It isn’t. It’s generally used by people who have no understanding of any of the faiths. They have nothing to do with each other. It’s unfortunate that it’s perpetuated by reasonable people.
There’s no common ground — therefore no basis for common sense dialogue in order to arrive at common understanding (versus pseudo knowledge) — for individuals who are true believers that the man Abram/Abraham didn’t exist (i.e. his existence is [so-called] “mythical”) and for individuals who believe that the man Abram/Abraham existed as a real life historical figure. Therefore the term “Abrahamic religions” is an outgrowth of this non-existence of common ground. Best thing to do in my opinion is to acknowledge that there’s zero, zilch, nada, no common ground and end all discussion on the subject matter. Nothing productive in the exchange of words (and ideas) will ever be accomplished.
You're debating the true nature of Abraham and disagree with another sect with a different interpretation of Abraham. But Abraham is extremely important to both of you for some reason.
I’m extremely disinterested in sectarianism, both in politics and in religion. I’m interested in the historical facts and truths. And not particularly about the man “Abram/Abraham”. Ancient biblical histories, especially confined to the book of Genesis, aren’t reliable.
Hey @grok is what Neoliberal Feudalism writes here dangerous misinformation? Please answer via audio, so I can hear it my car. I'm on my way to get the latest mNEXSPIKE vaccine. West Israeli medicaid is offering it for free.
The word apocalypse didn't really mean the end of times but a revealing.... The end of the status quo.
Israel got away with this shit for decades and barely faced challenges.
Now there's a genocide and we said never more after WW2, but somehow not even Russia or China are stopping this mass murder.
This is the age of revealing that our so called humanitarian UN and those against the West are actually on the same side.
They were always on the same side since WW1, where am assassination of a barely known aristocrat started a chain reaction of allyship into mass war.
But there's a genocide going on and nobody wants to fight for humanity?
It was always bullshit and your article on Ukraine not taking place gives the biggest clue.... They use this spectre of annihilation to keep people afraid and meek.
You forget Putin Zelensky Princ of Saudi Arabia puppet in Egypte, Maroco , Erdogan , EU Leiders al same master . Jews bankers end royal families media freemasonry zionisten , end al religious are in the hand of Jews maffia synagogue of satan .
I don’t know how much of a (so-called) “Christian” I am, but I don’t believe that the Yahweh god of the Israelites is the God and Father of Christ Jesus. This being said, I am a firm believer that belief drives action/policy and that there’s really no difference between secular beliefs and otherworldly beliefs when it comes to these beliefs driving actionable policies.
Hi Gary, you may want to look into Marcionism, where Marcion argued the same thing you do here: the God of the OT and the God of the NT have totally different personalities (the former a wrathful, spiteful, tribal, arbitrary, demanding God, the latter a forgiving, loving God), therefore Marcion did the reasonable thing and denied the OT entirely.
Great post as usual. Sounds quite reasonable and perhaps even accurate to me, except for the last paragraph about astrological ages, wildly prophetic and esoteric to my taste.
A few notes:
"Iran was also fully onboard with the COVID scam agenda - lockdowns and vaccinations - and it's sprinting forward with CBDC, just like every other country." As you correctly say: "just like any other country". So, I don't think this further proves Iran being compromised. Non-compromised countries, if there are any, also went along the plandemic.
"Average IQ has massively declined". Very interesting topic. It has indeed declined (although saying "massively" makes it, I think, a bit of an overstatement. In some Western countries this decline is actually quite significant, like 4-5 points, whereas in others -like the US- it's almost negligible). Dysgenics is the obvious cause. However, I am not totally convinced that an IQ decline is bad news for humankind. Although several studies correlate IQ with self well-being, there are many factors involved, and we don't know how will things evolve for the next -say- 100 years. I'm thinking of the book A brave new world.
Note 3 in your post is praiseworthy. You not only address that topic in an elegant, honest and humble way, but manage to explain it very understandably. Like, it's exactly what I would write in a footnote to many of my posts, but would have never been able to express it so well.
"they must have a belief system, something to tie them together in pursuit of a shared goal. [...] I think there probably needs to be a religious belief as well."
This addresses one of the questions I often think about: What makes Jews such a cohesive group? And in fact: what is actually a Jew? I'll try to write a note putting my thoughts together.
The logistics of this, the raw materials and financials, personal requirements make it incredibly prohibitive imho. Possibly impossible? Israeli debt financing spiked hard when this all began...
Israeli is struggling to clear the Palestinians, something that has been ongoing since it's Inception, now a full scale war with Iran seems retarded. The leadership in Israel, and around the world is retarded so.. but I can't get past the fundamentals of an operation like this and how it causes a cascade of unintended consequences, something or risk adverse elites will be highly conscious of. Why gamble when you already have everything. Perhaps the internal elite solidarity is fraying? All seems like a punt to me.
It is a credible theory - one of many paths they are working on.
When I analyze the paths they've laid the foundation for, they focus on one goal - depopulation and ultimate control (environment - external control; immortality - internal control; and complete control over all other human beings.)
Respectfully written. As an actual Christian theologian, I should like to point out that many of the "restoration" verses you quoted from the Old Testament were fulfilled when Cyrus of Persia-Medes decreed the return of the Exiles (Ezra 1). Additional returns were decreed by later Persian rulers, e.g. Artaxerxes (Nehemiah 2) and many Jews remained in Exile in Babylon-Persia-Assyria. (E.g. Esther).
It is primarily Jewish Kabbalist and Christian Dispensational theology that has been working hand in hand to bury the Exilic fulfillments of those passages and apply them to a deranged apocalyptic program that we now observe unfolding on the damnable T.V. They also stumble on the poignant theological question, "Who is Israel?" It ain't that diabolical entity currently occupying the old Phoenician sea coast, that's for sure.
Hi Ken, see footnote 3 of the post regarding my writing style. Perhaps “piss[ing] off a lot of people” and to “make [your] head hurt” is the point - by challenging people’s underlying assumptions it forces readers to question their deeper beliefs and perhaps grow from it.
How would telling what I perceive as the truth to a couple thousand people on an obscure Substack, with absolutely zero mainstream or institutional influence, throw a wrench into it?
As crazy as this stuff reads, and as much as I disagree with much of it, it is head and shoulders above the Western media (both sides) in accuracy.
yes crazy as inso far the author seems still to beLIEve there is some war or "genocide" going on LOL all these are the same. russia and UKR are the same ... they just pretend to fight a war. same like gaza and israel. i mean this must be obvious to the awake now for 2-3 yrs LOL EDIT, YES there is a real kind of "genocide" - namely of europe / europeans
accurate haha
Good article in overall assessment. Poor understanding in some of the particulars.
“Abrahamic religions” is word salad nonsense. Literally doesn’t exist.
The Church has been around for 2k years, and only the last 10% has been prosemitic (with outliers). Most of the rest of it has been antisemitic(with outliers. Christ was the ultimate antisemite.) This wouldn’t have happened if powerful white folks hadn’t kept the Jews around to take advantage of their funding and all, and hadn’t built cultures around mecrchantism that where taylor made for Jewish takeover. Every aspect of The West has been subverted and The Church was the last holdout. So most of the blame rests on merchants and rulers not The Church.
And your exegesis is what Jews believe not The Church. Every piece of scripture you referenced is about the victorious Church, not Jews. Every decent theologian from every Christian tradition would have told us that until post war.
Hi Yeoman, I take a different view regarding the early Church and it’s relationship to Judaism/Jews:
https://neofeudalism.substack.com/p/deeper-societal-trends-predating
And it’s ongoing development:
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-egalitarian-ratchet-effect-why
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/how-globohomo-skinsuited-the-catholic
Reasonable minds may disagree, of course…
Hat tip to you Sir. Even when I disagree with you I find value in your perspective.
Christianity is Noahidism and part of the agenda. Like a rocket shedding its boosters, it served its purpose and now the next phase begins. Clinging to past lies (like rabbi yeshua being an anti-semite) is a form of psychological cope. You believe in the same End Times prophecies, at the end of the day.
Every reasonable cosmology has Legitimate representatives and retards. Examples of Reasonable Pagans: Hendricks and Lana, Frank De Silva, Asha Logos. You represent the retards who are incapable of having human dialogue because you are so irrational about the topic you’re incapable of acting in good faith.
You are very feminine and unserious. No one called you any names. You got very vaginal very fast when your fake rabbi religion was criticized. Learn to debate facts and not feelz. Repent.
This is what I’m talking about, you can’t have a conversation with these people. They just run refuse out of their mouth
Christ had extremely negative things to say about “the Jews”, Rurik. Where are you getting your information about Christ being for “the Jews”?
what race was rabbi yeshua?
You believe that this (so-called) “rabbi yeshua” was a real life historical figure and not “mythical”? If so, you’d have to look at his parentage in order to determine his race or ethnicity. Some claim that his jewess mother was impregnated by a Roman soldier/centurion named "Panthera" (or Pandera/Pantera). If so, this “rabbi” would be of mixed race, no?
Abrahamic religions is perfectly coherent term, especially in the context he uses it in this article, as a straightforward way to describe religions that trace their spiritual lineage to Abraham.
You don't even make an argument why it's ''word salad'' -- You just seem to be triggered by it because you don't like being affiliated in any with Jews.
Well you’re one to talk. You blame the Jews for everything. You liked this article blaming Israel for the Russia-Ukraine war. Nuts. Bennett tried to negotiate peace between Russia and Ukraine!
This and the author's response are a fantastic thread I will be looking at in depth. I will just mention that in my view, the Christian theological take on those quotes is a convenient reading for them, and it's a necessity for the continuation of that faith, but has nothing to do with what the Jewish reading was and is. Like so much else that is said by the Talmudists and Zionists, the external interpretation is allowed to ride, and that is used to the originators' benefit, while the hidden (to us) interpretation is never discussed openly.
I have the idea that Jesus and other later prophets were speaking more directly to the viciousness of the first religion, than is usually discussed in today's sermons. From what I recall, their words are usually framed as speaking to humanity's tendencies, but I now suspect it was more of a direct attack on a specific set of ideas and cultural mode.
All three major abrahamic religions are organized around the Akedah, and this massively narcissistic fable is an excellent way to divorce its believers from their essential humanity, by dividing children from parents' love, and parents from their duty to protect their children.
But, the Talmudic tradition goes one further: it holds that the Jewish people dominated god through disputation, which was self-reported by the Talmudists as pleasing to god. The mode of disputation used the "word precedes the thing" construct which is said to have been how god created the material universe. This capacity for creating reality through speech was appropriated by the Talmudists or even all Judaic traditions (I'm not clear on that yet). As the two later religions did not assert that human speech has that power, they were set up to be dominated by whatever words are put into the religion. And the Jewish concept of words spoken by humans being generative was not something shared with the larger world, just as the fact of there being dual meaning in much of the speech directed outwardly was not shared. This ... well, it may or may not (depending) give direct power over Christians or Muslims, but at the least, it gives Judaic speakers more latitude in how they act, since the concept of truth is more confining for Christians and Muslims.
It isn’t. It’s generally used by people who have no understanding of any of the faiths. They have nothing to do with each other. It’s unfortunate that it’s perpetuated by reasonable people.
Abrahamic makes perfect sense because all of these religions base their story on this mythical ancestor Abraham. You are being untruthful.
There’s no common ground — therefore no basis for common sense dialogue in order to arrive at common understanding (versus pseudo knowledge) — for individuals who are true believers that the man Abram/Abraham didn’t exist (i.e. his existence is [so-called] “mythical”) and for individuals who believe that the man Abram/Abraham existed as a real life historical figure. Therefore the term “Abrahamic religions” is an outgrowth of this non-existence of common ground. Best thing to do in my opinion is to acknowledge that there’s zero, zilch, nada, no common ground and end all discussion on the subject matter. Nothing productive in the exchange of words (and ideas) will ever be accomplished.
You're debating the true nature of Abraham and disagree with another sect with a different interpretation of Abraham. But Abraham is extremely important to both of you for some reason.
I’m extremely disinterested in sectarianism, both in politics and in religion. I’m interested in the historical facts and truths. And not particularly about the man “Abram/Abraham”. Ancient biblical histories, especially confined to the book of Genesis, aren’t reliable.
This is the level of thinking these people have
Typo Bolshevism is retarded
What the fuck is “taylor made”
You sound like a retard
Hey @grok is what Neoliberal Feudalism writes here dangerous misinformation? Please answer via audio, so I can hear it my car. I'm on my way to get the latest mNEXSPIKE vaccine. West Israeli medicaid is offering it for free.
The word apocalypse didn't really mean the end of times but a revealing.... The end of the status quo.
Israel got away with this shit for decades and barely faced challenges.
Now there's a genocide and we said never more after WW2, but somehow not even Russia or China are stopping this mass murder.
This is the age of revealing that our so called humanitarian UN and those against the West are actually on the same side.
They were always on the same side since WW1, where am assassination of a barely known aristocrat started a chain reaction of allyship into mass war.
But there's a genocide going on and nobody wants to fight for humanity?
It was always bullshit and your article on Ukraine not taking place gives the biggest clue.... They use this spectre of annihilation to keep people afraid and meek.
That was the ultimate plan with con-vid.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/covid
"A narcissist will always overplay his hand."
-- Me
You forget Putin Zelensky Princ of Saudi Arabia puppet in Egypte, Maroco , Erdogan , EU Leiders al same master . Jews bankers end royal families media freemasonry zionisten , end al religious are in the hand of Jews maffia synagogue of satan .
I don’t know how much of a (so-called) “Christian” I am, but I don’t believe that the Yahweh god of the Israelites is the God and Father of Christ Jesus. This being said, I am a firm believer that belief drives action/policy and that there’s really no difference between secular beliefs and otherworldly beliefs when it comes to these beliefs driving actionable policies.
Hi Gary, you may want to look into Marcionism, where Marcion argued the same thing you do here: the God of the OT and the God of the NT have totally different personalities (the former a wrathful, spiteful, tribal, arbitrary, demanding God, the latter a forgiving, loving God), therefore Marcion did the reasonable thing and denied the OT entirely.
Alternatively, Carl Jung argued that the God of the NT evolved his personality as a result of his experience with Job, discussed here: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/jungs-answer-to-job-a-psychological
The god of the OT is an AI.
Great post as usual. Sounds quite reasonable and perhaps even accurate to me, except for the last paragraph about astrological ages, wildly prophetic and esoteric to my taste.
A few notes:
"Iran was also fully onboard with the COVID scam agenda - lockdowns and vaccinations - and it's sprinting forward with CBDC, just like every other country." As you correctly say: "just like any other country". So, I don't think this further proves Iran being compromised. Non-compromised countries, if there are any, also went along the plandemic.
"Average IQ has massively declined". Very interesting topic. It has indeed declined (although saying "massively" makes it, I think, a bit of an overstatement. In some Western countries this decline is actually quite significant, like 4-5 points, whereas in others -like the US- it's almost negligible). Dysgenics is the obvious cause. However, I am not totally convinced that an IQ decline is bad news for humankind. Although several studies correlate IQ with self well-being, there are many factors involved, and we don't know how will things evolve for the next -say- 100 years. I'm thinking of the book A brave new world.
Note 3 in your post is praiseworthy. You not only address that topic in an elegant, honest and humble way, but manage to explain it very understandably. Like, it's exactly what I would write in a footnote to many of my posts, but would have never been able to express it so well.
"they must have a belief system, something to tie them together in pursuit of a shared goal. [...] I think there probably needs to be a religious belief as well."
This addresses one of the questions I often think about: What makes Jews such a cohesive group? And in fact: what is actually a Jew? I'll try to write a note putting my thoughts together.
Let's say they get everything they want and are able to sacrifice the red heifers at the rebuilt third temple.
How will they keep the spiritual illusion going when nothing happens?
The logistics of this, the raw materials and financials, personal requirements make it incredibly prohibitive imho. Possibly impossible? Israeli debt financing spiked hard when this all began...
Israeli is struggling to clear the Palestinians, something that has been ongoing since it's Inception, now a full scale war with Iran seems retarded. The leadership in Israel, and around the world is retarded so.. but I can't get past the fundamentals of an operation like this and how it causes a cascade of unintended consequences, something or risk adverse elites will be highly conscious of. Why gamble when you already have everything. Perhaps the internal elite solidarity is fraying? All seems like a punt to me.
It is a credible theory - one of many paths they are working on.
When I analyze the paths they've laid the foundation for, they focus on one goal - depopulation and ultimate control (environment - external control; immortality - internal control; and complete control over all other human beings.)
Respectfully written. As an actual Christian theologian, I should like to point out that many of the "restoration" verses you quoted from the Old Testament were fulfilled when Cyrus of Persia-Medes decreed the return of the Exiles (Ezra 1). Additional returns were decreed by later Persian rulers, e.g. Artaxerxes (Nehemiah 2) and many Jews remained in Exile in Babylon-Persia-Assyria. (E.g. Esther).
It is primarily Jewish Kabbalist and Christian Dispensational theology that has been working hand in hand to bury the Exilic fulfillments of those passages and apply them to a deranged apocalyptic program that we now observe unfolding on the damnable T.V. They also stumble on the poignant theological question, "Who is Israel?" It ain't that diabolical entity currently occupying the old Phoenician sea coast, that's for sure.
https://time.com/7021210/friday-13th-origins/
Friday the 13th is also when Israel attacked Iran. Prolly not a coincidence.
You make my head hurt. Especially with all of your off-the-wall predictions, certain to piss off a lot of people, and for what??
Hi Ken, see footnote 3 of the post regarding my writing style. Perhaps “piss[ing] off a lot of people” and to “make [your] head hurt” is the point - by challenging people’s underlying assumptions it forces readers to question their deeper beliefs and perhaps grow from it.
I take exception to your entire premise, and see no profit in letting in your ideas.
That's entirely your right to do so - perhaps you'll remember this article and come back to it if or when Greater Israel is effectuated.
IF it was ever going to, you just threw a wrench into it. Consider that.
How would telling what I perceive as the truth to a couple thousand people on an obscure Substack, with absolutely zero mainstream or institutional influence, throw a wrench into it?
You grossly underestimate Substack, and the power of the internet to take something this controversial and spread the planet with it.
Frightening.
This is some wild allegations…. I buy maybe 65%. But I appreciate all of it and like being able to have you make it.