The complicated relationship between the central bank owners and the Jewish people
A push for a reconsideration of second order effects
This post discusses the complicated relationship between the Rothschild, Warburg, Milner, Schiff and other central bank owning families who rule the world with that of the Jewish population as a whole. This relationship is strained at times where the former are willing to sacrifice the latter to further their goals. Although hard-hitting, the point of the post is to encourage the Jewish masses to appreciate white Christian culture and work to preserve it as an alternative to the three likely future possibilities currently presenting themselves, which are all negative. It’s important to present the argument in a complete, synthesized and syncretic fashion, so it will be offered as one long post instead of broken up into multiple parts. "He who has eyes to see, let him see, and he who has ears to hear, let him hear."
The modern world is structured in a way that very few people understand. The world is organized around ever-increasing central bank debt, while the central banks of the world are owned through backchannels, intermediaries and financial complexities by a very small number of families. These central banks print money out of thin air and lend those funds to governments at interest; the more debt that governments and citizens carry, the more interest they pay and the richer the central bank owners get. They use the mechanisms of the Washington Consensus to increase their control further.1 Anything that increases public and private debt - via war or entitlement spending or otherwise - they consider to be good, while efforts to discharge such debts are to be bitterly fought. This ever-increasing debt burden can best be seen as a more sophisticated, more indirect version of slavery, which broadened from the slave class of yesteryear to humanity as a whole.
With respect to the relationship between the central bank owners and that of the Jewish people, the argument to be presented is an elaboration of arguably smartest man in the world
’s Gab posts here and here, which asserts that the Jewish masses unknowingly further the goals of the central bank owners by providing a passionate co-ethnic solidarity against what they feel is a hostile majority society in return for the central bank owners offering them small crumbs of money, power and preference. However, these Jewish masses are promptly cast aside by the central bank owners depending on political necessity without a second thought, and there is an undercurrent of malice by the latter which suggests the core relationship may strain in the future. This perspective will be more easily understood by the end of this post.It also marks a return to a series of earlier conversations in the comments section with
who has a Substack at Make It Real, and whose feedback on difficult issues presented in the giant essay at the Neoliberal Feudalism Substack have been appreciated.I have so far avoided directly addressing this topic (despite emphasizing that the structure of the modern world revolves around the central banking scam, and despite addressing it indirectly in many instances) because:
it is such a hot-button issue. Everyone wants to jump in and scream their opinion at the top of their lungs without first understanding the structure of the modern world or listening to the nuanced takes and coming to a sober, reasoned opinion;
it is common for the far-right to be mono-causal about this topic, where they overshadow all of the issues facing society and the world - technological innovation and ever-increasing governmental/power centralization (one of the few constants in the world), the egalitarian ratchet effect, the loss of individual autonomy and privacy, the role of automation and AI in relation to job loss, declining masculinity and lowered birth-rates worldwide even in far-flung Muslim countries (except for Africa), enormous non-sustainable environmental destruction and natural resource consumption, the fallen nature of this world, etc - down to “it’s just the Jews, stupid”, as elaborated by
here;the topic is forbidden from being discussed in modern society as a #1 priority (“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” - disputed authorship). Even blacks as a protected class are not allowed to broach the topic and are crushed and cancelled immediately if they try, i.e. Kanye West, Kyrie Irving, Jamie Foxx, Nick Cannon2 etc;
There were certain points that needed to be fleshed out and established in my writings first as background material, such as the natural selection explanation for higher Ashkenazi Jewish IQ;
I thought it would distract from my core points about the central bank system and why the western masses around the world allowed this system to develop, which ultimately stems from Pauline Christian egalitarianism and the money-lending carve-outs afforded to Jewish families during the Middle Ages. After all, it is not enough to investigate the thought process and incentive structure for how something developed; one must also ask why the great masses of people allowed a small minority to enact policies utterly against their own interests, a point the mono-causalists always fail to ask; and
I wanted to address this topic only if I felt I could be both comprehensive in coverage and bring new or under-considered arguments to bear, and I have not seen the argument made elsewhere that Jewish long-term self-interest requires allying with western civilization for real moving forward (as opposed to conditionally which has been their historical demotic strategy).
Hopefully I have driven my main points home so that I can discuss this issue without it overshadowing my core points, and I do think it is important to address this complicated topic, as a greater understanding will help with the complexification and syncretistic process that humanity uses to grow, develop and mature. So regardless of your political persuasion or background, take a deep breath, hyperventilate into your brown paper baggie, maybe take a Xanax, and relax if you decide to keep reading.
The following argument will address how the Jewish people admirably have the strongest Nietzschian will to power in the world, how they have fully internalized a series of values which allows them to advance their group goals as a minority within larger society without suffering cognitive dissonance, how this process procures first order results which are wildly successful (in terms of achieving material success, power and preferment) but second order results which are incredibly self-destructive (resulting in a furious majority population which seeks to expel or murder them, and/or their particular methods of power acquisition inevitably leads to a massively declining quality of life for all, including themselves).
This post will also describe the Jewish people’s unwillingness to consider these second order effects on a community level (there are always exceptions to such generalizations on an individual level), how the central bank owners take advantage of this mentality as a way to shield themselves from responsibility to the public, and the few Jews that do understand these issues and work to ameliorate them are expelled from their community. It serves as a warning that these second order effects are likely to have negative consequences for the Jewish community, and that only grappling with these issues directly and honestly can there be potential for another option.
I will be using, wherever possible, Jewish sources to make these points, especially from Jewish authors and prominent figures, from news sources such as the Jerusalem Post and Ynet News, and otherwise from establishment sources and experts, to the extent possible, to try to make these points with as much balance as possible, although some arguments by Nietzsche and points made by various controversial authors are unavoidable.
The basics
Let’s start with the basics. There are an estimated 16 million Jews worldwide. Of these 16 million, of those that don’t live in Israel almost all choose to live in white Christian countries. The highest Jewish population by country are: Israel, U.S., France, Canada, United Kingdom, Russia, Argentina, Germany, and Australia:
This decision isn’t simply a desire to live in wealthy countries. The richest countries in the world by total wealth include China, Japan, India, South Korea, and Taiwan, which have very few Jews. The richest countries in the world by GDP per capita include small city-states like Monaco, Lichtenstein, and countries like Luxembourg, Norway, Switzerland, Singapore, Qatar, Iceland, Denmark, which also have very few Jews. Instead it seems like Jews prefer to congregate in countries which are white, Christian, have both high trust and high levels of community cohesion, and where it isn’t too cold, I guess.
The average measurable verbal IQ of Ashkenazi Jews are arguably the highest of any group at ~112-115, compared to the European norm of 100. This contributes to their dominance in society, although their visuospatial abilities are typically somewhat lower by about half a standard deviation than the European average. According to anthropologists Cochran and Harpending, “This fact has social significance, because IQ (as measured by IQ tests or their equivalents, like the GRE or SAT) is the best available predictor of success in academic subjects and many jobs. [Ashkenazi] Jews are just as successful in such jobs as their tested IQ would predict, and they are hugely overrepresented in those jobs and accomplishments with the highest cognitive demands” - they are 10x greater than their share of the population for scientists, earning more than 25% of all Nobel science prizes, accounting for about half of 20th century world chess champions, they account for 22% of Ivy League students and are highly overrepresented as CEOs. These are astonishing statistics for such a tiny population. (Although they are much more over-represented than their higher verbal IQs would suggest, suggesting that nepotism/clannishness plays a large factor as well3, and the results of the IQ studies have been disputed as flawed in various ways, also see here by
).These elevated IQs were caused by natural selection pressures during the Middle Ages. Ashkenazi Jews occupied a unique and exclusive role as European money-changers given the Catholic Church banned Christians from this role, and the most successful Jews had many more children than the less successful. Due to their inability to intermarry with the surrounding Christian population, over many generations these selection pressures produced these higher average verbal IQs. See the second half of this post if you want more details on this process.
Note that when the Christian-imposed prohibition on intermarriage with Jews ended in the second half of the 20th century, Jewish intermarriage rates spiked and in the modern era 70% of Jews intermarry, which is called by some Jews as the “silent Holocaust” and will result in Ashkenazi higher average verbal IQ dissipating over time. Additionally, given birth rates for Orthodox women are 3.3 children per woman whereas the rate for non-Orthodox women is only 1.4 children per woman, a combination of intermarriage and low secular Jewish birthrates means that the future of Judaism will belong to the Orthodox, both within and outside of Israel.4
Compared to the Ashkenazim, Mizrahi Jews have a very different background and history in relation to their roles in society. The Mizrahim did not occupy an exclusive money-changer role in the Muslim lands they occupied (900,000 lived in the Middle East until the creation of Israel in 1948, when they were all gradually expelled or otherwise fled through 1967), they were subject to the restrictive laws of Dhimmitude and were not richer than surrounding populations. Their IQs were and are average, equal to the surrounding populations in which they lived, and the far-right criticisms of Jews are primarily directed at the Ashkenazim, who are extremely influential and overrepresented among the powerful in society, not the Mizrahim.
Historical and ongoing tensions between the Jewish and European communities
Tension between the Jewish and European communities dates back to Roman times, which resulted in the Jewish-Roman wars, the destruction of the Second Temple and the Jewish diaspora. As written about previously, writers as diverse as Cicero (106-43 BC), Horace (65-8 BC), Pliny the Elder (23-79 AD), Seneca (4-65 AD), Quintilian (30-100 AD), Martial (40-105 AD) Tacitus (56-120 AD), Juvenal (55-130 AD) and Marcus Aurelius (121-180AD) heavily criticized the Jews for what they considered stubborn ideology and subversion, as well as militant zealotry. Why wouldn’t the Jews just accept, in a polytheistic manner, their Jehovah as one among many Gods, like so many other conquered peoples had done? Meanwhile, Jews hated that the Romans tried to push their Gods, their customs and beliefs onto them, while also taxing and ruling them. There was a fundamental and core disagreement that was not bridgeable.
The behavior of the Jews toward Rome and their attempts to avoid Hellenization flabbergasted the Romans, according to blogger Europa Soberana:
Only naive men could think of forbidding the Torah, the Shabbat or the Brit Milah without realizing that the whole of Jewry would prefer to die rather than renouncing their traditions. The Greeks and the Romans, from their Olympic naivete, were too myopic in their approach to the Jewish problem. They ignored the particularities that differentiated the Jews from the rest of the Semitic peoples of the Near East, and thought that they could place their temples and statues there as if the Jews were nothing more than another Arab or Syrian province, either Hellenised or Persianised. The persistent identity that Jewry had shown did not motivate the carefree Romans to sufficiently wrap their heads around the problem. The conviction that the Greco-Romans had of being carriers of a superior culture made them fall into a fateful error: to think that a culture can be valid for all humanity and exported to peoples of different ethnicity. The Hellenisation and Romanisation of the East and North Africa had only one effect: ethnic chaos, the balkanization of Rome itself, ethnic struggles and finally, the appearance of Christianity.
Even using the brute force of her legions Rome was slow to realize that the Jews, in their resentment and their desire for revenge, did not care [if they had] to sacrifice waves upon waves of individuals if they managed to annihilate a single Roman detachment. This fundamentalist fanaticism, which went beyond the rational, must have left the Romans speechless, who were not accustomed to seeing an ill-equipped military people immolate themselves in that convinced manner, with a mind full of blind faith coming from a jealous, vengeful, abstract and tyrannical god. Jehovah is, without a doubt, an extremely real will, and also a force clearly opposed to the Olympian and solar gods of the European peoples, whose height was the Greco-Roman Zeus-Jupiter.
After the destruction of the Second Temple and the scattering of the remaining Jews, there remained ongoing tensions between Jews and surrounding communities over the centuries, although their treatment within Muslim lands was overall safer and more comfortable than in Europe, perhaps because they were poorer and less influential, and therefore not the subject either of jealousy or seen as a threat, or perhaps because of the many similarities between Judaism and Islam compared to Christianity.5
During the Middle Ages within Europe, the surrounding Christian populations bitterly opposed the Jewish role as money-changers, which were exacerbated by accusations of unscrupulous practices such as usury, self-favoritism and nepotism (the latter of which are accusations that are also leveled at other successful groups such as Indians in Silicon Valley now). There were also increasing accusations, such as by Martin Luther (echoed in the modern era by Ron Unz6), that the Talmud itself7 encouraged Jewish supremacy and treatment of non-Jews as akin to cattle8, and that it is quite negative in its characterizations of Jesus and Mary.9 Regardless, the Ashkenazim had amassed a great deal of wealth and were living a lifestyle commensurate with that of the lower nobility. Majority populations always and naturally oppose wealthy minorities within their nations and this was no exception: Jews, lacking a homeland, were always discriminated against as outsiders, a point emphasized by
.As a result of these factors Jews were kicked out of numerous European countries and pogrommed often, where the Christian majorities killed large numbers of them.10 For example the First Crusade of 1096 resulted in the deaths of ~25% of the Jewish population in the Rhineland.
Beyond all of these issues, though, there seemed to be a fundamental difference between Jews and European non-Jews, a difference that was deeper than mere wealth, power or control: it was a difference in basic outlook, the different ways in which they saw the world.
These tensions stem from fundamentally different outlooks
As written previously, the core of the conflict between the Jewish and non-Jewish populations in Europe stemmed from fundamentally different outlooks on life. According to historian Karma Ben Jonathan in “Reconciliation and Its Discontents: Unresolved Tensions in Jewish-Christian Relations,” which deals with the aftermath of the Second Vatican Council in 1965 and the document “Nostra aetate” in which the Catholic Church declared the abandonment of its anti-Jewish heritage and its desire to reconcile with Judaism, “Ben Johanan concludes that, whereas Christian discourse aimed at conciliation, Orthodox Jewish discourse responded to Christianity with growing hostility, which predated the Second Vatican Council and deepened thereafter.” Maurice Samuel, a Romanian-born British and American award winning novelist (winning the 1944 Anisfield-Wolf Book Award and the Itzik Mangar Prize), translator and lecturer of Jewish heritage, argues that Jews and non-Jews are simply incompatible in his 1924 book “You Gentiles.” In it he states:
“Years of observation and thought have given increasing strength to the belief that we Jews stand apart from you gentiles, that a primal duality breaks the humanity I know into two distinct parts; that this duality is a fundamental, and that all differences among you gentiles are trivialities compared with that which divides all of you from us….that primal difference, which I have sensed more and more keenly as I have tasted more and more of life, your life and our life, is a difference in the sum totals of our respective emotions under the stimulus of the external world; it is a difference in the essential quality or tone of our mental and spiritual being. Life is to you one thing — to us another. And according to these two essential qualities we make answer to the needs and impulses which are common to both of us.
To you life is a game and gallant adventure, and all life’s enterprises partake of the spirit of the adventurous. To us life is a serious and sober duty pointed to a definite and inescapable task. Your relation to gods and men spring from the joy and rhythm of the temporary comradeship or enmity of spirit. Our relation to God and men is dictated by a somber subjection to some eternal principle. Your way of life, your moralities and codes, are the rules of a game - none the less severe or exacting for that, but not inspired by a sense of fundamental purposefulness…For you certain acts are “unbecoming” to the pertinent ideal type - whether he be a knight or a “decent fellow.” We have no such changing system of reference - only one command….we will not accept your rules because we do not understand them…
This difference in behavior and reaction springs from something much more earnest and significant than a difference in beliefs: it springs from a difference in our biologic equipment. It does not argue the inferiority of the one or the other. It is a difference in the taking of life which cannot be argued. You have your way of life, we ours. In your system of life we are essentially without “honor.” In our system of life you are essentially without morality. In your system of life we must forever appear graceless; to us you forever appear Godless.
Seen from beyond both of us, there is neither right nor wrong. There is your Western civilization. If your sense of the impermanence of things, the essential sportiness of all effort, the gamesomeness and gameness of life, has blossomed in events and laws like these I have seen around me, it cannot, from an external point of view (neither yours nor ours) be classified as right or wrong. Wars for Helen and for Jenkins’ ear; duels for honor and for gambling debts, death for a flag, loyalties, gallant gestures, a world that centers round sport and war, with a system of virtues related to these; art that springs not from God but from the joyousness and suffering of the free man, a world of play which takes death itself as part of the play, to be approached as carelessly and pleasantly as any other turn of chance, cities and states and mighty enterprises built up on the same rush of feeling and energy as carries a football team - and in the same ideology - this is the efflorescence of the Western world. It has a magnificent, evanescent beauty. It is a valiant defiance of the gloom of the universe, a warrior’s shout into the ghastly void - a futile thing to us, beautiful and boyish. For all its inconsistencies and failures within itself, it has a charm and rhythm which are unknown to us. We could never have built a world like yours….
These are two ways of life, utterly alien to the other. Each has its place in the world - but they cannot flourish in the same soil, they cannot remain in contact without antagonism. Though to life itself each way is a perfect utterance, to each other they are enemies.”
Samuel’s contention is that there is an enormous, unsurmountable gulf between the perspectives of the Jews and the non-Jews, and such differences are reflected in the Jewish texts: “But I ask: Are Plato and Shakespeare and Kant in your life what the Bible, the Talmud, the rabbis are in ours? To our very masses, the Jewish masses, the wonders of the world are Moses, Elijah, the Rambam, the Vilna Gaon, the Dubna Maggid, the chassid in the neighboring village. These actually dominate our life, as governments, mass radio exploits, armies and Woolworths dominate yours. We are the people of the Book. But we were the people of the Book before a million copies could be printed in a single day.”
Nietzsche’s will to power and the inversion of societal values
How is a small nation, self-prohibited from evangelizing for converts, with an intense desire not to get absorbed into other cultures or to be conquered and controlled, able to not only survive but thrive in this world for thousands of years? There is nothing else in the world like the Jewish people. Before discussing a possible explanation, there are historical examples that should be discussed first, along with the present moment.
The first is the rise of Christianity during the Roman/Jewish wars. The argument has been fleshed out here, but per Nietzsche and various other astute commentators11, including Jewish ones, the argument is that Jews crafted Christianity as a revenge strategy against Rome, who was the dominant military power in the world and impossible to defeat militarily. This isn’t an attack by Nietzsche on the figure of Jesus himself, who he viewed as a pure-hearted rebel against the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and the “only true Christian.” But Nietzsche noted that all of the early Christians were Jewish, and he saved his vitriol especially for Paul of Tarsus. By Paul inverting Roman values from warrior to priestly values12, evangelizing the masses of poor, slaves, and women steeped in ressentiment by telling them they were morally and spiritually equal or superior to the Roman emperor, it would destabilize the hated Roman Empire and provide revenge. Nietzsche wrote regarding this strategy of spiritual bolshevism, “The Jews, a people ‘born for slavery’, ‘the chosen people among peoples,’ as they themselves said and believed, achieved the amazing feat of inverting values, thanks to which life on earth for two millennia has possessed a new and dangerous appeal. Their prophets fused ‘rich,’ ‘godless,’ ‘evil,’ ‘violent,’ and ‘sensuous’ into a unity. In this inversion of values (to which belongs the use of the word for ‘poor’ as a synonym for ‘holy’ and ‘friend’) lies the significance of the Jewish people: with them begins the slave rebellion in morality.”13
The invention of Christianity solved another problem, too: how easily a physical location such as the Temple had always been for physically stronger neighbors to conquer. By metaphorically changing and putting the heart of the Temple inside believers, it made Rome’s overwhelming military might irrelevant. I had previously quoted Richard Carrier in a footnote in the above post, but it’s worth repeating here (to be clear, I do not endorse Carrier’s thesis surrounding the existence or non-existence of Jesus, which is irrelevant to my argument):
"A spiritual solution to the physical conundrum of the Jews would have been a natural and easy thing to conceive at the time. Those Jews who believed they could physically retake control of the temple naturally pinned their hopes on military messianism (as exemplified by the Zealots and the Sicarii, and everyone who led actual rebellions against Rome, from Judas the Galilean to Bar Kochba). But if any Jews had realized that such a reconquest was impossible (as some must [given the long-standing overwhelming military might of Rome]) but still sought a means to escape their cognitive dissonance without denying the evident facts or abandoning deep-stated religious beliefs (and it is reasonable to assume at least some Jews did seek such means without going to such ends), then for them only one solution remained: to deny the physical importance of the temple at Jerusalem itself.
That would require replacing it, and not with another temple (as that would only recreate the same problem all over again and thus not in fact solve it, as was evident in the fate of the Samaritan messianic uprising at Gerizim), but with something intangible, which neither the Romans nor the corrupt Jewish elite could control (as the intangible cannot be seized or occupied), and which required neither money nor material power to bring about or maintain (the two factors perceived to have corrupted the original temple cult - and to always favor the Romans, who alone had boundless quantities of both), and whose ruler was himself incapable of corruption (and there was only one who was truly incapable of corruption: God).
This does not entail that anyone did think this, only that it would have been an easy and natural progression of thought from problem to solution, and therefore not implausible. It fit the political and religious context and our understanding of human nature and ingenuity. Therefore, if any religious innovator had proposed that God had arranged a supreme sacrifice capable of cleansing all once and for all (such as, e.g., through the ritual atoning sacrifice of his firstborn son), and further arranged that God’s spirit would, as a result, dwell forever within each individual who pledged himself to him (and thus no longer dwell, or dwell only, within the temple at Jerusalem), then his message would resonate among many Jews as an ingenious and attractive solution to the problem of Jewish elite corruption and Roman invincibility, by eliminating the relevance of the temple to messianic hopes, and thus eliminating the basis for any doomed military conflict with Rome, and further eliminating the problem of the corrupt Jewish elite by simply disinheriting them from God’s kingdom and removing them as middlemen between the people and their God - all without requiring the deployment of any physical or military resources. One simply had to declare that it had been done. God’s will. Sorted.
The basic Christian gospel - imagining that the death of a messiah had conclusively atoned for all sins (as the OT could already be understood to say), and that by joining with him (through adoption by baptism; and through symbolic consumption of his body and blood) God would dwell in us (instead of the temple) - would thus be recognized by many Jews as an ingenious and attractive idea. Especially since the end result would be that instead of taking orders from the Jewish elite, we would have as our sovereign no fallible men but Christ himself, God’s appointed Lord, directly speaking to his subjects from the right hand of God in heaven (by spirit and angelic communication, and secret messages planted in scripture). Thus the problem of elite corruption is seemingly removed without requiring violence or money or diplomacy or military victory. God has his victory; and all cognitive dissonance is resolved…
The only sacred space this doctrine required one to physically control was one’s own body, a notion already popularized by philosophical sects such as the Stoics, who taught that nothing external can conquer a man who in his wisdom remains internally free. Not death, nor imprisonment, nor torture represented any victory over him. This was therefore a battle one could always win, even against the ‘invincible’ Romans. One merely had to believe it, to feel it was true, that God now lived in you. No other evidence was required. Thus it should not surprise us that Christianity converted all the military imagery of popular messianism into spiritual metaphor, to represent what we would now call a cultural war. This aligns perfectly with the notion of a spiritual transfer of authority to the people, negating the relevance of the temple and the Jewish elite, while retaining the most fundamental requirements of being Jewish (namely, faith and obedience to the commandments of God; though even that would later be done away with).
The relevance of this observation is that the earliest Christian gospel makes far more sense as a product of its political context than it does when completely divorced from that context…The centrality of the temple was a continual problem for the Jews. A physical location requiring political control entailed military domination. So long as the Romans had the latter, the Jews would never have the former. The Zealots took the logical option of attempting to remove the Romans and restore Jewish control. But the Christians took the only other available option: removing the temple from their entire soteriological (or ‘salvation’) scheme.
Christians could then just await God’s wrath to come from heaven, while in the meantime, God’s promise could be delivered unto the kingdom they had spiritually created (Rom. 14.17-18; 1 Cor. 4.19-20), first in an anticipatory way (in the moral and ‘supernatural’ success of the Christian community), and then in the most final way (in the apocalypse itself: e.g. 1 Cor. 15.24, 50; 6.9-10; Gal. 5.19-25; 1 Thess. 4.10-5.15). That the Christians and the Zealots both may have come from the same sectarian background, and pursued collectively the only two possible solutions to the problem facing the Jews at the time, reveals Christianity to be more akin to something inevitable than something surprising.”14
As mentioned in the link above, this spiritual Bolshevik strategy worked masterfully and eventually resulted in the destruction of Rome. Gibbon himself attributed in part Rome’s fall to Christianity, which sapped Rome of its fighting spirit, de-motivated its population, and extended their desires to that of the afterlife.
Nietzsche ended his point with the following:
Let’s bring this to a conclusion. The two opposing values “good and bad,” “good and evil” have fought a fearful battle on earth for thousands of years. …The symbol of this battle, written in a script which has remained legible through all human history up to the present, is called “Rome against Judea, Judea against Rome.” To this point there has been no greater event than this war, this posing of a question, this contradiction between deadly enemies. Rome felt that the Jew was like something contrary to nature itself, its monstrous polar opposite, as it were. In Rome the Jew was considered “guilty of hatred against the entire human race.” And that view was correct, to the extent that we are right to link the health and the future of the human race to the unconditional rule of aristocratic values, the Roman values.
By contrast, how did the Jews feel about Rome? We can guess that from a thousand signs, but it is sufficient to treat ourselves again to the Apocalypse of St. John, that wildest of all written outbursts which vengeance has on its conscience…
The Romans were indeed strong and noble men, stronger and nobler than any people who had lived on earth up until then or even than any people who had ever been dreamed up. Everything they left as remains, every inscription, is delightful, provided that we can guess what is doing the writing there. By contrast, the Jews were par excellence that priestly people of ressentiment, who possessed an unparalleled genius for popular morality…
Which of them has proved victorious for the time being, Rome or Judea? Surely there’s not the slightest doubt. Just think of who it is that people bow down to today in Rome itself, as the personification of all the highest values — and not only in Rome, but in almost half the earth, all the places where people have become merely tame or want to become tame — in front of three Jews, as we know, and one Jewess (in front of Jesus of Nazareth, the fisherman Peter, the carpet maker Paul, and the mother of the first-mentioned Jesus, named Mary). This is very remarkable: without doubt Rome has been conquered.15
Heavy and mind-blowing stuff.
Under the theory advanced by blogger Adam Green, by gentiles buying into the notion that Jews were originally the Chosen People, by adopting their Old Testament as a cornerstone of their belief system, and by adopting the Jewish God, gentiles become unable to fully oppose Judaism; while there are periodic pogroms over the centuries, it was a half-hearted opposition based on Jews killing Christ where the Jews represented an errant cousin religion. In other words, gentiles adopting Christianity resulted in elevating Jews to a special position which they never possessed among the Hellenists. Romans had treated Judaism as an unexceptional sect among a multitude of sects that the Roman Empire managed without special status or preferment. Green posts many videos of Orthodox Jewish rabbis who publicly argue this point: they state, in a semi-conspiratorial tone, that Peter and Paul were Jewish double agents sent to convert pagans to Christianity so they would obey the Noahide laws and worship the Jewish God.16 Therefore Christian antagonism to Jews is half-hearted and it serves Jewish purposes by preventing assimilation. The same argument would apply to Islam, which is another religion “of the Book”.
Economic Bolshevism in Russia
Just as spiritual bolshevism was born and propagated among the Jewish people during their greatest time of need against the Romans, we can see a similar strategy play out in Tsarist Russia with communism. Communism was a strategy to rile up the poor against the Tsar, created by Karl Marx (a third cousin to the Rothschilds who let four of his children starve to death out of neglect) and as argued previously, it was very heavily financed by the central bank owners and their allies. According to Alexander Solzhenitsyn in his book “200 Years Together”, which no publisher dared translate into English for decades, the early pushers of communism were dramatically overrepresented by Jews who until then were living in the Pale of Settlement.
According to Seth J. Frantzman in the Jerusalem Post, in Russia at this time Jews made up 2% of the USSR’s population. When Theodor Herzl visited the Russian Empire in 1903, he met Count Witte, the Minister of Finance. According to Leonard Schapiro, who authored The Role of the Jews in the Russian Revolutionary Movement in 1961, Herzl found that “50% of the membership of the revolutionary parties was Jewish.” Alexander Guchkov, the Russian minister of war in the Russian Provision Government after Tsar Nicholas II abdicated in March 1917, told the British military attache General Alfred Knox that “the extreme element consists of Jews and imbeciles.” Lenin’s return to Russia had included nineteen members of his Bolshevik party, several of his allies among the Mensheviks and six Jewish members of the Jewish Labor Bund. Almost half the passengers on the train were Jewish.
Winston Churchill claimed the Jewish role in the Russian Revolution “probably outweighs [the role] of all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.” He named names: Maxim Litvinoff, Trotsky, Grigory Zinoview, Radek, Leonid Krassin. He accused Jews of playing “the prominent, if not indeed the principal part in the system of terrorism” that had then become known as the “red terror” or the suppression of those in the Soviet Union who deviated from the communist line. In the Sixth Congress of the Bolshevik Russian Social Democratic Labor Party and its Central Committee elected in August 1917, we find that five of the committee’s 21 members were Jewish. This included Trotsky, Zinoviev, Moisei Uritsky, Sverdlov and Grigori Sokolnikov. Except for Sverdlov, they were all from Ukraine. The next year they were joined by Kamenev and Radek. Jews made up 20% of the central committees until 1921. Half of the top contenders in the Central Committee of the Communist Party to take power after Lenin’s health declined in 1922 – Lev Kamenev, Trotsky and Zinoviev – were Jewish. Yakov Sverdlov, the chairman of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee from November 1917 to his death in 1919, was Jewish. Of those in power that weren’t Jewish, according to Molotov, many had Jewish wives: “There is an explanation. Oppositionist and revolutionary elements formed a higher percentage among Jews than among Russians. Insulted, injured and oppressed, they were more versatile. They penetrated everywhere, so to speak.” He claimed that Jews were more “active” than average Russians.” The Bolsheviks made anti-semitism a capital offense after seizing power.17
According to Sever Pocker in Israel’s Ynet News, within a short period of time, the Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to KGB. We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags. The GPU’s deputy commander and founder/commander of the NKVD was a Jewish mass murderer named Genrikh Yagoda. Yagoda implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed. Stalin's close associates and loyalists included a Jewish member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich, responsible for the Holodomor which starved to death millions of Ukrainians. Another Jew was Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD's special department and the organization's chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist. In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5% of those holding the senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges.
Naftaly Frenkel, a Turkish Jew was responsible for the creation and implementation of the Gulag system. Frenkel presided over the development of the nourishment scale, or the "you-eat-as-you-work system": he divided the prisoners into (1) those deemed capable of heavy work, (2) those capable of light work and (3) invalids; each group received a different set of tasks and quotas to meet and were fed accordingly, with prisoner’s rations determining their fate.
The Revolution tended to eat its own, though, and the Jewish membership in the Central Committee declined in the 1920s. By the 11th Congress, only Lazar Kaganovich was elected alongside 26 other members. Subsequently few Jews served in these positions; in 1925 there were 4 Jews out of 63 members. Like the rest of their comrades, almost all of them were killed in the purges. Others elected in 1927 and 1930 were shot as well, including Grigory Kaminsky. With the exception of Lev Mekhlis and Kaganovich, few senior communist Jews survived the purges.
As the Soviet Union became less “dreadful” post-Stalin (whose death was quite curious18), per Robert Conquest, it became less popular in the west.19 Later, when it collapsed, a hugely disproportionate share of Jews benefited from corrupt, opaque privatization efforts and became wealthy oligarchs.20 Today Putin, considered by liberals in the West as a proto-Hitler type, regularly fires critics of Chabad and the Russian central bank remains firmly under control of the Rothschilds. I have written elsewhere that the whole Russian/Ukraine war is fake, although the dead bodies are real.
As Solzhentisyn said: “You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.”
Racial bolshevism in the West
While Jews were wildly overrepresented among early Christians pushing spiritual bolshevism in Rome and among early communists pushing economic bolshevism in Russia, the same pattern is playing out in America and throughout the west generally today in the form of racial bolshevism, or what the blogger Spandrell calls bioleninism. The existing order of white Christians is being overturned by non-whites and non-heterosexuals — blacks, browns, women, homosexuals, transsexuals — and the white percentage of the U.S. population has cratered from 90% to 60% in two generations:
There are similar but not as extreme trends in Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the rest of western Europe. It is a slow rolling but historically breathtakingly fast white, western civilizational suicide.
In modern America an intersectional hierarchy has arisen based off the distance an individual is from the “highest privileged” group, defined as straight white males. This is a visualization of the victim hierarchy:
If white males are considered at the bottom of the victim hierarchy due to their superior privilege, where do Jews fall on the hierarchy? Despite making up 2.4% of the population (like in the Soviet Union), Jews make up an enormous percent of individuals in higher education (both students and professors); in well paying white collar careers (doctors, lawyers, in finance); in the media, in politics (both serving and as donors), in entertainment (according to the LA Times, "The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions... When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish”), in government and as billionaires.
Additionally, the government is also staffed primarily with Jews. Per the Jerusalem Post, Jewish Journal, and Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Jews serving within the Biden administration include Antony Blinken, Secretary of State; David Cohen, Deputy CIA Director; Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury; Merrick Garland, Attorney-General; Avril Haines, Director of National Intelligence; Ron Klain, Chief of Staff; Eric Lander, Director, Office of Science & Technology Policy; Rachel Levine, Deputy Secretary, Health and Human Services; Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security; Anne Neuberger, Director of Cybersecurity, National Security Agency; Wendy Sherman, Deputy Secretary of State; Jeff Zients, COVID-19 Coordinator; Rochelle Walensky, Director, Center for Disease Control; Jared Bernstein, member, Council of Economic Advisors; Douglas Emhoff, second gentleman, husband of US Vice President Kamala Harris. And of course there’s infamous, bloodthirsty neocon Victoria Nuland, currently serving as Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, who specializes in causing tremendous chaos and upheaval abroad.
Jews are also wildly over-represented among White House staff:
This is the government which stole the 2020 election and is in the process of possibly imprisoning Trump for life before targeting white middle America (see here for the latest update) and is turning America into a permanent one party state.
It’s not just limited to Democrats, of course. Among the Trump administration, also per the above Jerusalem Post link, there were also a large number of Jews. Among them included Jared Kushner, son-in-law and senior advisor; Elliot Abrams Special representative for Venezuela, then Iran; David Friedman, Ambassador to Israel; Jason Greenblatt, Special Representative for International Negotiations, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict; Steve Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury; Stephen Miller, Senior Advisor, Policy; Gary Cohn, Director, White House National Economic Council; Reed Cordish, Assistant to the President, Intragovernmental and Technology Initiatives; Avrahm Berkowitz, Deputy Advisor to the President; Rod Rosenstein, Deputy Attorney General; Elan Carr, Special Envoy to monitor and combat antisemitism; Ellie Cohanim, Deputy Special Envoy to monitor and combat antisemitism; Jeffrey Rosen, Attorney General; Morgan Ortagus, Spokesperson, State Department; David Shulkin, Secretary of Veterans Affairs; Lawrence Kudlow, Director National Economic Council; Ivanka Trump, daughter, Advisor to the President; John Eisenberg, National Security Council Legal; Ezra Cohen-Watnick, Acting Under-Secretary of Defense for Intelligence; Len Khodorkovsky, Deputy Secretary of State and Senior Advisor to the US Special Representative for Iran.
AIPAC, of course, is famous for the enormous influence it wields in Congress. And among non-Jews, Jewish influence is so strong that even those considered to be further right such as Senator Ted Cruz spent July 4/Independence Day praising Israel.
This is an astonishing level of domination for a group with such a small percentage of the population, and it is not a new trend. It is also forbidden as an absolute prohibition from being discussed.21 There is essentially zero representation among white right wing populists in positions of power. Meanwhile, the intensity of Jewish animosity on social media and television spouting the most vitriolic lies against whites and Christians is too numerous to quantify, and it happens on a daily basis.22 They seem to have very little self-awareness that their positions are based in unhinged emotionalism; it is like they are operating on impulse and then verbally justifying their impulses to themselves thereafter. The dynamic is very strange.
With the above in mind, is it any wonder that Jews have been at the forefront of all the so-called social justice movements of the 20th century in America (per Israel Today)? As blogger “Pumpkin Person” writes,
“The 20th century has been a period of great social change. Feminism, civil rights, gay rights, affirmative action, mass immigration, rock and roll, hip-hop, the welfare state, transgender people, secularism, [porn23] etc…When a single theory unifies so many disparate facts, Occam’s razor demands we consider it. When one looks at all the social changes of the last 50 years, what they all seem to have in common is the subversion of white population growth. Feminism gave white women careers, making them much less likely to have white babies. Civil rights, hip-hop, rock ‘n’ roll, and affirmative action increased the sexual market value of black men at the expense of white men, thus decreasing white male fertility. The rise of gays, transgender people and secularism gave millions of whites permission to abandon a traditional family lifestyle, thus damaging their genetic fitness. Meanwhile, the welfare state encouraged poor women (who tend to be non-white) to have more children and mass immigration spread non-white genes into traditionally white countries.”
Jews have been vastly overrepresented in all of these movements. And as I have previously argued here and here, it is the very nature of Christianity itself that facilitates this outcome by inverting Hellenist warrior values into priestly slave-morality values, and where Christians treat Jews as a mere errant cousin religion.
Per Kevin MacDonald, “Jews benefit from open, individualistic societies in which barriers to upward mobility are removed, in which people are viewed as individuals rather than as members of groups, in which intellectual discourse is not prescribed by institutions like the Catholic Church that are not dominated by Jews, and in which mechanisms of altruistic punishment may be exploited to divide the European majority.”24
Political and social realities dictate the strategies employed. Before attaining dominance in the United States, most American Jews emphasized freedom of speech, tolerance, plurality, and individual rights, as they did through much of the 20th century, even going as far as the ACLU defending the KKK in court to demonstrate their commitment to individual rights. After attaining total dominance in the early 21st century, as we are currently seeing, they about-faced and demanded censorship, total control, and promoted vicious anti-white, anti-Christian group-based hatred. Flexibility is key, and whatever is useful at any given time, irrespective of any previously stated values or positions, will be used to further power accumulation. Howard Stern is a good example of this concept, riding a wave of anti-establishment free speech in his early career to wealth and fame and then, once established, turned around and became extremely and viciously anti-populist (i.e. “pulling the ladder up”). Frank Herbert wrote of this principle. “When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.”
Among the minority of Jews that vote Republican (roughly 30% of the Jewish vote; 70% consistently vote Democrat), most are comprised of Israel First religious types (Ben Shapiro) and/or corporatists who want lower taxes as a top priority. According to the Hudson Institute, compared to other ethnic groups this is highly irregular:
“All the other ethno-religious groups that, like the Jews, formed part of the coalition forged by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the 1930s have followed the rule that increasing prosperity generally leads to an increasing identification with the Republican party. But not the Jews. As the late Jewish scholar Milton Himmelfarb said in the 1950s: ‘Jews earn like like Episcopalians (then the most prosperous minority group in America) and vote like Puerto Ricans (who were then the poorest).’ Jews also remain far more heavily committed to the liberal agenda than any of their old ethno-religious New Deal partners. As the eminent sociologist Nathan Glazer has argued, ‘whatever the promptings of their economic interests,’ Jews have consistently supported ‘increased government spending, expanded benefits to the poor and lower classes, greater regulations on business, and the power of organized labor.’…on abortion, gay rights, school prayer, gun control and assisted suicide, the survey data shows that Jews are by far the most liberal of any group in America.”
Republican Jewish voters seem to dislike white Christian America less than Jewish liberal types do, but any Jewish identification with historic white, Christian America still results in being shunned by the overall community, such as with Stephen Miller.
During the critical period leading up to the 1965 Immigration Act that transformed the demographic reality of America, for example, per MacDonald,
“Anti-restrictionist attitudes were held by the vast majority of the organized Jewish community—‘the entire body of religious opinion and lay opinion within the Jewish group, religiously speaking, from the extreme right and extreme left,’ in the words of Judge Simon Rifkind who testified in Congress representing a long list of national and local Jewish groups in 1948. Cofnas advocates the ‘default hypothesis’ that because of their intellectual prowess, Jews have always been highly overrepresented on both sides of various issues. This was certainly not true in the case of immigration during the critical period up to 1965 when the national origins provisions of the 1924 and 1952 laws were overturned—and long thereafter. I have never found any Jewish organization or prominent Jews leading the forces favoring the 1924 and 1952 laws—or those opposed to the 1965 law at the time it was enacted. Joyce (2021) shows the continuing powerful role of Jews in pro-immigration activism in the contemporary U.S., and, as noted above, there is substantial Jewish consensus on immigration into the present.”
Therefore, due to left/right Jewish consensus on core anti-white majoritarian issues, an almost ubiquitous liberalism unique to Jews that transcends wealth or social positions, a joint shunning of Jewish dissidents, and intense, sustained, hostile emotional impulses and outbursts, an explanation of clannishness and fear of victimization fail to fully account for Jewish overrepresentation or extreme pro-censorship positions. For the missing element, we turn back to Nietzsche…
Summing up the general trend
Nietzsche believed that the Jewish people had the greatest will to power of any group on earth.25 Even the Talmud points to this extraordinary will to power.26 I am going to quote him here, and the quote is quite negative, but keep in mind that Nietzsche despised anti-semitism, and the core of his vitriol was reserved for Pauline Christianity. Nietzsche ultimately believed that knowledge had to involve a synthesis of opposites.27 Here is the quote, which sums up the trends discussed above:
“The Jews are the most remarkable nation of world history because, faced with the question of being or not being, they preferred…being at any price: the price they had to pay was the radical falsification of all nature, all naturalness, all reality, the entire inner world as well as the outer.…Considered psychologically, the Jewish nation is a nation of the toughest vital energy which…took the side of all décadence instincts…because it divined in them a power by means of which one can prevail against ‘the world.’ The Jews are the counterparts of décadents: they have been compelled to act as décadents to the point of illusion….[T]his kind of man has a life-interest in making mankind sick, and in inverting the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘evil,’ ‘true’ and ‘false’ in a mortally dangerous and world-maligning sense.”
In other words, the Jewish people managed to humble and destroy their powerful Roman enemy, to overthrow an Orthodox Christian Tsardom steeped in history and tradition, and seize power from the WASPs in the West with small numbers and little physical power by riling up the underclass of society and using that underclass to smash the existing ruling structure. But people don’t want to think of themselves as evil; they want to think themselves as the good guys for smashing the existing functioning, wealthy order. Therefore “the price they had to pay was the radical falsification of all nature, all naturalness, all reality, the entire inner world as well as the outer” and “compelled to act as décadents to the point of illusion” — i.e. acting on behalf of the poor, the oppressed, the downtrodden, as an act to the point of illusion, meaning they don’t suffer internal dissonance, they honestly believe the inverted value structure they are pushing.28 This is an evolutionary advantage as cognitive dissonance holds one back from pursuing the strategy vigorously enough. It is an open question as to how exactly this evolutionary advantage evolved.29
In addition to standing up for the downtrodden, a second component of this perspective is to always see themselves as a downtrodden victim themselves, no matter the level of power, status, or wealth accrued. Kevin MacDonald confirmed this point when discussing the Jewish role in opening up America to massive, unchecked immigration:
“Non-Jews have a difficult time fathoming Jewish communal memory. For strongly identified Jews, the “vilely discriminatory” actions of immigration restrictionists are part of the lachrymose history of the Jewish people. Immigration restriction from 1924–1965 is in the same category as the Roman destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D., the marauding Crusaders of the Middle Ages, the horrors of the Inquisition, the evil of the Russian Czar, and the rationally incomprehensible calamity of Nazism. These events are not just images drawn from the dustbin of history. They are deeply felt images and potent motivators of contemporary behavior. As Michael Walzer noted, “I was taught Jewish history as a long tale of exile and persecution—Holocaust history read backwards.” From this perspective, the immigration restriction of 1924–1965 is an important part of the Holocaust because it prevented the emigration of Jews who ultimately died in the Holocaust—a point that Steinlight dwells on at length.”
A fear of victimization as represented in such stories as the Exodus, Haman/Purim, the Holocaust, dread of Christian pogroms and the Crusades, the Roman destruction of the Temple and from textual support in the Torah are deep-rooted aspects of the Jewish psyche, and concerns about physical violence being directed at the community are an ever-present, overriding concern for both secular and religious Jews alike. Therefore a mentality of we must do whatever it takes, lest we be persecuted again pervades — but the actions taken ultimately and paradoxically reinforces the dangers of the persecutions they are so terrified of.
As I wrote at the start of this essay, the first order effects of this bolshevik strategy are magnificent; power, status, money, prestige. It works wondrously time and again. But the second order effects are dreadful, resulting in a tremendous loss of life and widespread poverty lasting indefinitely (i.e. the Dark Ages after the transvaluation of Roman values, decades of horror of Bolshevik rule in the Soviet Union), which increasingly affects more and more of the Jews just as it affects the non-Jews, until nothing is left but misery and despair for everyone and they move on to repeat this process elsewhere. And the second order effects of this strategy in America and the West, while creeping up for decades, are really exploding in the population’s faces now, and it’s going to get much, much worse. The Dark Ages lasted for 1,000 years after the fall of Rome — perhaps this time the darkness lasts forever.
The central bank owners in relation to the Jewish people
We can now circle back to
’s two Gab posts here and here at the beginning of this essay. According to Eustace Mullins, regarding the perspective of the central bank owners:The central bank owners adopted the Hegelian dialectic, the dialectic of materialism, which regards the World as Power, and the World as Reality. It denies all other powers and all other realities. It functions on the principle of thesis, antithesis and a synthesis…Thus the World Order organizes and finances Jewish groups; it then organizes and finances anti-Jewish groups; it organizes Communist groups; it then organizes and finances anti-Communist groups. It is not necessary for the Order to throw these groups against each other; they seek each other out like heat-seeking missiles and try to destroy each other. By controlling the size and resources of each group, the World Order can always predetermine the outcome. In this technique, members of the World Order are often identified with one side or the other. John Foster Dulles arranged financing for Hitler, but he was never a Nazi. David Rockefeller may be cheered in Moscow, but he is not a Communist…a distinguishing trait of a member of the World Order, although it may not be admitted, is that he does not believe in anything but the World Order. Another distinguishing trait is his absolute contempt for anyone who actually believes in the tenets of Communism, Zionism, Christianity, or any national, religious or fraternal group…If you are a sincere Christian, Zionist or Moslem, the World Order regards you as a moron unworthy of respect. You can and will be used, but you will never be respected.”30
What the central bank owners do, who are mostly Jewish (although they have brought in non-Jews into their inner circle when absolutely necessary to effectuate their plans, such as the Rockefellers and likely a number of English nobility) is cynically exploit the Jewish population’s fear and terror of the majority population. By combining and confusing the public’s anti-central banker sentiment with anti-Jewish sentiment, they can use the Jewish people as a bulwark against the desires of the majority population to overthrow the shackles of the central bank terror and domination. This is why the the 16th Amendment authorizing personal income taxes, the Federal Reserve, the IRS and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) all came into existence in 1913. Do you see? Do you understand?
But the central bank owners, despite being mostly co-ethnics, do not really care about the Jewish people. Sure, the Jewish public receives preferential treatment in hiring in media, in universities, in government roles and elsewhere, along with protection from accusations of excessive privilege, plus critical early (and ongoing) support for the creation of Israel (i.e. the Balfour Declaration directed to Walter Rothschild31) in return for providing subversive aggression against the white Christians. But the central bank owners view them as suckers who will gladly offer bulwark protection against the unwashed masses in return for economic crumbs, and the owners and their higher-level minions are happy to throw Jews under the bus when politically necessary32, such as seen in World War 2 when the only Rothschild that died, despite the clan being based in Europe and despite the central bankers engineering the war, was a Rothschild’s Christian convert ex-wife. Neither did they force the western countries under their control to accept Jewish refugees during the war, see here. South African Jews (12th largest in the world at 50,000) are suffering currently along with the whites as the country careens toward white genocide, and in France due to globohomo’s importation of millions of Muslims it is dangerous to self-identify as a Jew in public. And many Jews are increasingly suffering as America falls apart into racial strife and massive inflation; most Jews are not wealthy, even if a small minority are, although many are somewhat better off than the general population.
But there is a more sinister element, too. Israel was the most locked down country in the world along with Australia, and it’s Jewish population - but not its Muslim population - was 3-4x forced vaccinated with ultra dangerous, untested mRNA vaccines, resulting in a massively spiking deathrate. Israeli officials knew about the vaccine dangers, proceeded anyway, then attempted to cover it up. That this happened is at odds with the world central bank owners having positive intentions toward the Jewish community; there was no reason for them to do this, something Chris Langan also addresses here. And this example can’t really be fit into a traditional white nationalist perspective.
If white Christians are eliminated per central bank owner goals, does it make sense that they may also choose to eliminate the next threat to their perpetual rule - those of their own people?
The likely upcoming possible outcomes
There are three possible futures that seem likely or less-than-likely-but-still-possible for the Jewish people at the moment. These three are:
The U.S. continues its completely open borders policies, becomes a permanent one party state, becomes more and more non-white and hostile to the dwindling white population as part of its egalitarian ratchet effect. The ultra rich (such as the central bank owners and their highly placed allies) retreat into armed, gated communities much as the ultra rich in Brazil and other Latin American countries have already done, and anyone not rich or connected enough to live in one is cast out into the Thunderdome with tremendous crime, poverty, and general filth. Many, most or almost all of the Jewish masses are forced to live terrible, low quality lives in the Thunderdome, right alongside everyone else. It is entirely possible that things get so bad like things are in South Africa now (a situation that Jews also played a wildly disproportionate role in) or where France is headed that it becomes unlivable, and the much more tribal non-whites unite and expel the Jews. This is the subtext of this New York Times article which worries that Jews are losing control over non-whites, this one where globohomo is having pro-Palestinian protesters arrested, this one where a majority of American (non-white) youth believe Hamas’s attack on Israel was justified, or this one where even Republicans are turning against support for Israel. The concept of the “golem” features prominently in Judaism, i.e. a summoned creature that turns on its master. The golem in this case is non-white immigration, used so successfully to wrest power away from white Christians, but the golem is now turning on its benefactors… Due to demographic and immigration trends perhaps Islam and Africa eventually just conquer the world;
The fabled white Redneck Rebellion happens; i.e. whites in America rise up, overthrow the current system and institute white nationalism. I think the odds of this are unlikely given the demographic situation, whites lacking any institutional power whatsoever (even a nominally pro-white congressman, Steve King, was harassed out of office over nothing). Regardless, if this happens the Jewish people are likely to be in a very unhappy situation. Whites in America are already far less sympathetic to Israel and Jews in the latest Israel/Gaza war than they were in prior decades and far more unwilling to fight in globohomo wars, in part due to neocon failures in Iraq and Afghanistan (another second order effect after Jewish neocons like Ben Shapiro pushed so intensely for war in Iraq); or
The Rothschilds and their allies simply win across the board, instituting CBDCs, throwing everyone into 15 minute “smart cities”, injecting ultra-dangerous and untested mRNA vaccines into food, stealing everyone’s funds, “you will own nothing and you will be happy”, slowly murdering all whites who they view as a threat; the vast majority of Jews fall victim to this scam as well and are gradually eliminated as a second-order threat after the whites to perpetual central bank owner rule.
These options are all terrible for the Jews, and if I were a betting man I would bet on either option 1 or option 3 happening, or option 2 as an interim to option 1 or 3.33 This is because the central bank owners piggyback off the wave of ratcheting egalitarianism but are not the cause of it; therefore one can expect the latter to ultimately subsume the former. On the other hand, the central bank owners have been winning nonstop since at least the founding of the Bank of England in 1694, so maybe their streak continues.
The alternative
Is the objective merely to get as much power and status as Jews can possibly reach for, even if the longer term consequences are dreadful? Or is the objective to create a sustainable lifestyle in harmony with the surrounding population over the long-term, even if the trade-off to that is less money, power, status, control?
The alternative to the above dreadful three options is simple: don’t kill the golden goose. The golden goose is western civilization; white, (still relatively) homogenous, prosperous, (formerly) high trust. Jews should consciously recognize that it is a special place and worth preserving, that it gives them a much higher quality of life than they would otherwise have if it is lost or destroyed. This would have to involve (1) getting rid of the extreme paranoid victimization outlook the vast majority of Jews carry; (2) consciously scale back the intensity of will to power/will to dominate; (3) work to honor and defend existing institutions and peoples instead of demoralizing and trying to destroy them; (4) consciously understanding the nature of the Rothschild and ally central bank scam and rejecting it; and (5) consciously avoid attacking or excommunicating others in the Jewish community who make similar decisions. This could involve but does not require assimilation into existing society. Policy changes required would be an immediate halt to open borders, an expulsion of illegal immigrants, an end to far-leftist lawfare practices, punishment for higher-level perpetrators of globohomo’s crimes, instituting governmental transparency, ending the Federal Reserve, breaking the media into a hundred pieces, and instituting real freedom of speech and association.
There are a handful of prominent pro-America Jews in recent times: these include Stephen Miller, Ron Unz, Darren Beattie (who runs the excellent Revolver News), Henry Makow, Lawrence Auster (biologically Jewish who converted to Christianity), Andrew Breitbart (the opposite) and Steve Sailer (who identifies as biologically half-Jewish).
But regardless of these handful, there is no organized movement within the Jewish community with these values. As mentioned above, the entire spectrum of the Jewish community from left to right is united in its beliefs for open borders (for the U.S., not for Israel) and using the country for purely first order needs. And I do understand the benefits to the Jewish community that accrue from generating intense hostility from the majority population; it helps to keep the Jewish community united and avoid assimilation or disappearing via the “Silent Holocaust”. But still, these upcoming options are all so terrible that it merits a fundamental re-examination of these issues.
For non-Jews, I would encourage you to stand with those Jews who break from their communities as identified above, or those like them (while identifying and rejecting those merely pretending to be “nationalists” like Ben Shapiro), in order to provide an off-ramp to Jewish concerns about the majority’s fundamental hostility. If the traditional white nationalist perspective “wins out” that all Jews should be rejected then that gives the whole Jewish community no other option but to remain hostile, and history has shown that Jews, with the greatest will to power on the planet, make for problematic enemies. This is the logic that Pyotr Stolypin used when trying to save Russia by offering the Jewish people an off-ramp toward economic prosperity, even though he was ultimately assassinated by a Jewish communist, and the logic that Nazi Germany explicitly rejected. Give Jews an off-ramp if they demonstrate loyalty to the values of western civilization, and it will drastically lower the temperature of the core dispute. If white nationalists insist on trying to destroy the entire Jewish people (as some do, particularly some of the most virulently online anti-semites), the Jewish people will unite against them and destroy them instead.
Also keep in mind that white nationalism is a poor Schelling point today given whites now make up 6.5% of the worldwide population, down from 25% in 1900. Whites were 98% of the population in Nazi Germany; there are no comparable homogenous figures anyway close in the west today. And anyways, Germany was set up to be destroyed by the central bankers from the outset. The Western financial powers fattened up a defeated WW-1 Germany with extremely low interest rate loans (the ridiculous German “economic miracle”), armed it and supplied it, tracking production figures every step of the way via leaks from Reichsbank head Hjalmar Schacht to Bank of England head Montagu Norman, encouraged the rise of lebensraum-obsessed Hitler and the Nazis so the Germans and Russians would destroy each other and allow the Western powers to conquer the continent. Very few people understand the actual dynamics of this conflict.
A better and more realistic Schelling point is to have the whole world unite against Rothschild central bank usury, which is a horrendous thing for all but the central bank owning families and their close allies, likely 0.001% of the world or less.
Conclusions
The relationship between the central bank owners and the Jewish masses is a complicated one. In return for crumbs of preferment the former use the latter as a bulwark against the great non-Jewish masses rising up and overthrowing their central bank parasitism. But the central bank owners are both fine with throwing Jews to the wolves when politically expedient, they force-vaxxed a deadly experimental mRNA poison onto the Jewish population in Israel (but not the Muslims) harsher than anywhere else in the world, and they are fine with letting most Jews suffer as the central bank owners push the world into a horrendous neoliberal feudalism.
The future possibilities for Jews based on current trends are all negative — either the Rothschilds win and bring misery to the vast majority of them along with everyone else, or western civilization is destroyed and their quality of life massively declines while the threat of non-white ethnic blocks arise (like in South Africa with blacks or Muslims in France), or (unlikely) there is some sort of white nationalist Redneck Rebellion. The alternative to these options is for Jews to understand the second order effects of their enormous, unparalleled will to power, to appreciate white Christian western civilization and to work to defend it before it is too late while changing their own community norms to do so as well.
Thanks for reading.
Per Stanley Sheppard: “Exactly the right definition…"Washington consensus". The term was coined not that long ago, back in 1989, and essentially means how finances of the third world countries should be managed. Initially it applied to South America, but as Soviet Union was dissolved, Russia was given the status like that of Brasil or Argentina. The consensus consists of the three core principles - manage population using Darwinian principles, tightly control money supply primarily by the means of high interest rates, do everything possible to prevent internal investments in the manufacturing sector or anything else working to develop own economy and to create a favorable internal investment climate. The extent to which this consensus is applied to countries varies - Russia gets one of the harshest treatments. Now the bigger question is, how and why Russian fiscal authorities during the all out proxy war are still compliant with imposed rules? This drives many people to conclusion that perhaps this is not a real war between Russia and the West, but a make believe conflict at the expense of Ukraine designed to achieve totally different goals vs. those pronounced by Putin last February.”
Nick Cannon was fired by ViacomCBS in 2020 for remarks construed as “anti-semitic”. He issued a groveling apology the next day. He was then allowed to resume his career, but with the stipulation that he must do his master's commands moving forward. In 2023 Cannon was coerced into hosting Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL to denounce Kanye West. Cannon must not enjoy being a financial terror victim/hostage, but with so many kids by so many different women, he is in no position to declare independence.
Let’s look at Jewish student representation in higher education at Harvard as an example. In an analysis of Harvard undergrads, Ron Unz concluded that Jews and Asians constituted approximately half of Harvard’s student body, leaving the other half for the remaining 95% of America. A 2009 article in the Daily Princetonian (“Choosing the Chosen People”) cited data from Hillel, a Jewish campus organization, that with the exception of Princeton and Dartmouth, on average Jews made up 24% of Ivy League undergrads. On the basis of Richard Lynn’s estimates of Ashkenazi Jewish IQ and correcting for the greater numbers of European whites, and given Jews making up 2% of America and white Christians roughly 55-60% of the population, the ratio of non-Jewish Whites to Jews should be around 7 to 1 (IQ >130) or 4.5 to 1 (IQ > 145). Instead, the ratio of non-Jewish whites to Jews is around 1:1 or less.
Per Kevin MacDonald, Espenshade and Radford show that there is discrimination against poor whites and against non-urban whites—exactly the population groups that are least likely to be Jewish. There is a “a general disregard for improving the admission chances of poor and otherwise disadvantaged whites.” Additionally “when lower-class whites are matched with lower-class blacks and other non-whites the degree of the non-white advantage becomes astronomical: lower-class Asian applicants are seven times as likely to be accepted to the competitive private institutions as similarly qualified whites, lower-class Hispanic applicants eight times as likely, and lower-class blacks ten times as likely. These are enormous differences and reflect the fact that lower-class whites were rarely accepted to the private institutions Espenshade and Radford surveyed. Their diversity-enhancement value was obviously rated very low.” They also found that high school participation in commonly understood white middle America activities dramatically lowered admissions chances: “What Espenshade and Radford found in regard to what they call “career-oriented activities” was truly shocking even to this hardened veteran of the campus ideological and cultural wars. Participation in such Red State activities as high school ROTC, 4-H clubs, or the Future Farmers of America was found to enormously reduce a student’s chances of gaining admission to the competitive private colleges in the NSCE database on an all-other-things-considered basis. The admissions disadvantage was greatest for those in leadership positions in these activities or those winning honors and awards.… Excelling in these activities “is associated with 60 or 65 percent lower odds of admission.”
These data strongly suggest that the degree of Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities has little to do with IQ but rather with discrimination against non-Jewish white Americans, especially those from the working class or with rural origins.
This is why the current controversy over judicial supremacy in Israel is mere smoke and noise; the secular, leftist Ashkenazi coalition within Israel is doomed sooner or later due to terrible birthrates.
Both Islam and Judaism are religions which regulate to minute detail every aspect of a believer’s life with their respective Sharia and Halakhah systems. Both traditions contain detailed legal and ethical instructions for both religious and social life. Unlike Christianity, which relies on councils or synods to rule on doctrine, ethics and behavior, the laws and beliefs in Islam and Judaism are derived through a process of debate. In fact the two religions are so close in terms of their structure that the tenth-century rabbinic leader Saadia Gaon unselfconsciously referred to Jewish law as shar’ia, the prayer leader in a synagogue as an imam and the direction Jews faced when praying as qibla. Both religions emphasize correct action (orthopractic belief), versus the Christian focus on prayer/repentance for salvation and an emphasis on correct belief (orthodoxy). Per Israel Shahak in “Jewish History, Jewish Religion”, Jews view Christianity as idolatrous but not Islam.
According to Ron Unz, "My encounter a decade ago with Shahak’s candid description of the true doctrines of traditional Judaism was certainly one of the most world-altering revelations of my entire life. But as I gradually digested the full implications, all sorts of puzzles and disconnected facts suddenly became much more clear. There were also some remarkable ironies, and not long afterward I joked to a (Jewish) friend of mine that I’d suddenly discovered that Nazism could best be described as “Judaism for Wimps” or perhaps Judaism as practiced by Mother Teresa of Calcutta."
i.e. the codified Oral Law during the Babylonian exile after the destruction of the Second Temple.
For example, Jewish sociologist Baruch Kimmerling states that "the abundance of ethnocentrism, hate, contempt, chauvinism, and double standards expressed toward Gentiles in the major and most authoritative and 'holy' Jewish religious scriptures … is very troubling for any person who expects from 'Judaism' the expressions of an enlightened culture. These expressions and 'laws' are quite perplexing and as a phenomenon can be labeled as 'antigentilism'.” Noted Israeli scholar Israel Shahak agrees with this analysis. According to Elizabeth Dilling, who studied the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud (only released in 1948 as the Soncino Edition - why so late?) for a dozen years, “the Talmud’s basic law is that only the Pharisee Jew ranks as a man or human being. All others rank as animals, ‘the people who are like an ass - slaves who are considered the property of the master.’” Indeed, in 2010 Israel’s top Sephardic rabbi declared that the only reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve Jews. The attitude resulting from such teachings has always been resented by non-Jews, with such resentment portrayed by Jews as “persecution of the Jews.” Dilling adds, “The Bible under Talmudic Judaism is considered to be a collection of simple tales fit only for fools, women and children. The Talmud ‘sages’ thus must find new meanings in it by letter and number tricks which reverse the plain meaning and create out of it the permission to do otherwise forbidden crimes and misdeeds. The words of the Bible are continually misused and misquoted for purposes of blasphemy and reversal.”
The wildly divergent representations of God between the Old and New Testaments, with the God of the Old Testament being jealous, erratic and wrathful, while the God of the New Testament being a God of love and forgiveness, led the Gnostic Christians to conclude that the God of the Old Testament is the Demiurge. The fusing of these wildly divergent Gods into one in mainstream Christianity is why the the term “Judeo-Christianity” is an apt term.
It is not just limited to European Christian lands, though: Jews were expelled from Assyria (733/2 BC, 722 BC), Babylon (597 BC, 587-576 BC), the Roman Empire (139 BC, 38 AD, 41-53 AD, 73 AD, 119 AD), Medina under the Muslims (7th century), Almohades in Spain (mid-12th century), Yemen (1679-1680).
"Defeat led to Jewish dispersion. From that dispersed seemingly hopeless position, the descendants of the Jews began to wage, in Graetz's words, "a new kind of warfare against long-established Roman institutions" which would ultimately "modify or partly destroy them." Graetz is referring to Christianity - the most successful Jewish sect, in his view. To conquer Rome from within, Judaism had to be modified, however, and it "became estranged from and placed itself in harsh antagonism to the parent source." E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History, page 28. Greatz wiki here.
The priestly mindset is one based on subservience, conformity, equality, pity, guilt, suffering and self-hatred: in other words, the herd morality. It is a mirror image inversion of Roman warrior values. Greatness, strength, individuality, self-determination, immediacy of purpose, honor, acceptance of hierarchy and nobility have been shunned; one can scarcely devise a lower conception of man.
Beyond Good and Evil, 195.
This is why Moshe Dayan’s decision to give the Temple Mount back to the Islamic Waqif after capturing it during the 1967 war was the correct one. In its current form Judaism is fully spiritualized and hence unconquerable without destruction of the Jewish people; but if the third temple is built, Israel will need to be militarily stronger than all of its enemies or face the same problems it had with the first and second temples.
Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morality, I,16.
Per Adam Green, "The Eastern Orthodox Church venerates Gamaliel as a saint. In the Talmud, Gamaliel is a top Pharisee, Jerusalem Sanhedrin leader, and one of the greatest Rabbis of all time. Acts says Saul the Pharisee/Saint Paul was trained by Gamaliel. Very suspicious to say the least.” Acts 22:3: "I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Clicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel…” "Gamaliel holds a reputation in the Mishnah for being one of the greatest teachers in all the annals of Judaism.”
According to an old Jewish tradition, Simon Peter joined the early Christians at the decision of the rabbis. Worried that early Christianity's similarity to Judaism would lead people to mistake it for a branch of Judaism, he was chosen to join them. As he moved up in rank, he would be able to lead them into forming their own, distinct belief system. Despite this, he was said to remain a practicing Jew, and is ascribed with the authorship of the Nishmas prayer.” Also see here.
According to Joseph Sobran, "History is replete with the lesson that a country in which the Jews get the upper hand is in danger. Such was the experience of Europe during Jewish-led Communist revolutions in Russia, Hungary, Romania, and Germany after World War I. Christians knew that Communism — often called “Jewish Bolshevism” — would bring awful persecution with the ultimate goal of the annihilation of Christianity. While the atheistic Soviet regime made war on Christians, murdering tens of thousands of Orthodox priests, it also showed its true colors by making anti-Semitism a capital crime. Countless Jews around the world remained pro-Communist even after Stalin had purged most Jews from positions of power in the Soviet Union.”
The timing of Stalin’s death is quite curious, given he was on the verge of expelling all of the Soviet Union’s Jews to Siberia. Per the Jewish Telegraph Agency: “The day of March 5–when Stalin died in 1953 from a stroke–should similarly be marked by Jews as a miraculous day to remember. His sudden death came as a great miracle for the 3,000,000 Jews in the Soviet Union. It thwarted his plans, scheduled to be started the next day, to annihilate the Jews in Russia through mass-pogroms and deportation of all surviving Jews to slave labor camps in remote Arctic regions to die there a slow and tortuous death.
The signal to this brutal plan was to be given March 6 at the opening of the notorious “Doctors’ Trial” at which six prominent Jewish and three non-Jewish physicians were accused by Stalin falsely of having plotted to poison him and other Soviet leaders in the Kremlin. The trial was cancelled immediately upon Stalin’s death, the physicians were released and rehabilitated.”
Conquest, Reflections on a Ravaged Century, 138-139: "As the Soviet Union became less dreadful under Stalin's successors, it became less popular in the West....Once again we see the USSR as more unpopular in the comparatively moderate post-Stalin period than at the height of Stalinist terror - because of the completeness of falsification in the earlier phase!"
See Bernard Black, “Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?”, p. 22-23.
Until the latest Israel/Hamas war the societal expectation was that Jews were considered excluded from the intersectionality pyramid due to the Holocaust. See this chart.
However, non-white leftist youth during this war refuse to acknowledge this exception any longer and lump Jewish privilege in the category of white privilege, and these youth vehemently hate both whites, Christians and Jews. Because the non-white youth is much more leftist than older generations, this is becoming a big problem for Jews as recently acknowledged by the ADL:
This is where the “early life section" of wikipedia meme comes from; internet users would check the ethnicity of the most unhinged, vitriolic statements being made in the media, and most of the time the purveyor of the statements would be Jewish.
i.e. see the Wiki entry for Al Goldstein: “"In his book XXX-Communicated: A Rebel Without a Shul, [Jewish pornographer] Luke Ford wrote about a conversation with [famous Jewish pornographer Al] Goldstein, in which Ford asked Goldstein why Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the porn industry. He answered, "The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don't believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged." Ford then asked, "What does it mean to you to be a Jew?" To which Goldstein responded, "It doesn't mean anything. It means that I'm called a kike." Ford also asked, "Do you believe in God?" Goldstein said, "I believe in me. I'm God. Screw God. God is your need to believe in some super being. I am the super being. I am your God, admit it. We're random. We're the flea on the butt of the dog.”
Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Criqiue, 35. Also see this article at the Jewish magazine Forward, where, according to the Jewish Mexican who negotiated NAFTA on behalf of Mexico, "Generally, Jews do better in open societies,” he said. While reluctant to say that Jews specifically benefit from such trade pacts, he emphasized that societies that are more open, as the provisions in such pacts require, “tend to be more tolerant of minorities in general.” Trump’s campaign, with its fusillades against free trade, was also “very xenophobic — not just anti-Semitic, but also anti-Mexican, anti-Muslim. That’s the kind of thing that ends up harming all minorities.”
“The Jews, however, are beyond any doubt the strongest, toughest, and purest race now living in Europe.”[Beyond Good and Evil 251]. Here is another, from The Antichrist: “Psychologically considered, the Jewish people are a people endowed with the toughest vital energy, who, placed in impossible circumstances . . . divined a power in these instincts with which one could prevail against ‘the world.’”[Antichrist 24]. He again praises the Jews for having the strength to rule Europe if they chose to: “That the Jews, if they wanted it—or if they were forced into it, which seems to be what the anti-Semites want—could even now have preponderance, indeed quite literally mastery over Europe, that is certain”[Beyond Good and Evil 251]
One foundational story in the Talmud demonstrates how the authority of the rabbis overshadows the authority of God and, essentially, strips God of his sovereignty, making the rabbis the new Gods. The story describes a debate between Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua regarding an oven, the Oven of Akhnai:
The debate arose from a question asked by a man who owned a clay furnace (oven). He enlarged it by breaking it in pieces and then reassembling it, using sand, to create a bigger oven. The debate brought before the Sanhedrin was whether the new oven was Kosher or impure. The Talmud specifies that Rabbi Eliezer had brought forward “every imaginable argument” and proved that the oven was in fact Kosher. But the vast majority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin would not accept his arguments and claimed that the oven was NOT Kosher. Rabbi Eliezer went on to prove his claim using supernatural signs: A carob tree miraculously uprooted itself and replanted itself on the other side of the court. A channel of water flowed uphill. But the climax of the story was when Rabbi Eliezer called out: “If the Halachah agrees with me, let it be proved from heaven.” And then, God spoke from the heavens and said: “Why do you dispute with Rabbi Eliezer, with whom the Halachah always agrees?” Meaning, God called out from the sky, saying that Rabbi Eliezer was right. Then, Rabbi Yehoshua stood and made one of the most significant claims in the Talmud: “The Torah is not in heaven!”
[Thus, Rabbi Yehoshua’s argued] God no longer holds the reins. Now, the mandate belongs to the rabbis alone. THEY have all power and control. [And] God is left outside.
The Talmud goes on to say that, after the debate, God smiled in agreement and said: “My children have defeated Me, My children have defeated Me.” Meaning, according to the rabbinic legend, God submitted to the authority of the rabbis and therefore, even He admitted that their rulings not only surpassed the authority of Moses, but the authority of God Himself.
From then on, God stopped revealing Himself to the people of Israel, as He did in biblical times. From that moment on, the rabbis’ judgment and rulings are the new Torah, which they call the “Oral Law”.
This is incredible stuff; has any other religion in history claimed to usurp the power of God? Indeed, “Israel” in Genesis 32:28 is defined as “one who struggles with God”. But the Oral Law didn’t come without controversy: during the time of Jesus, there were competing Jewish sects such as the Karaites who rejected it entirely and the Saudducees who partially rejected the Oral Law. But ultimately the Pharisee sect won out because much of the Torah centered around Temple practices, and when the Temple was destroyed in 70 AD, the religion had to evolve away from worship at the Temple in order to survive, and the other sects faded into obscurity.
According to Ayn Rand’s Atlas Society, “Nietzsche’s concept of knowledge did not only allow for contradictions. It required them. Only total, comprehensive knowledge, which incorporated opposite opinions, was true knowledge for him. Thus, it was possible for him to write for and against Judaism, for and against Christianity, for and against racism. The National Socialists could interpret his writings any way they wished and manipulate them for their ends because of Nietzsche’s explicit rejection of reason and logic.”
Throughout world history the strong nations of the world have dominated the weak. Even today, now, we see weak Orthodox Christian Armenia getting destroyed and absorbed by Muslim Azerbaijan while the world doesn’t care, completely ignoring it. Or see the splintered Kurds who the world also ignores, or the Slavs being butchered in Ukraine in a deliberate central bank controlled strategy. The inversion of reality to the point of illusion is perhaps the price to be paid for a small nation to avoid this fate.
Potential contributing factors include a background of 2,000+ years of learning anti-gentile Talmudic/Oral Law diatribes, a hyper focus on Jewish victimization, selective breeding across dozens of generations for strength in Talmudic learning emphasizing verbal dexterity and cleverness (Rabbis were the highest status individuals in their communities and had the best opportunities for procreation), and ideological selection pressures from the destruction of competing Jewish movements, such as the anti-Talmudic Karaites which at one time were 40% of Jews and now number only 40,000. Unfortunately, the hypothesis that political belief and orientation can become hard-coded over generations of breeding has no research, probably due to lack of funding and implied loss of job security and reputation (the closest one can get is minimal research into the genetic interaction between biology and political orientation; also see group selection theory).
Eustace Mullins, The World Order: Our Secret Rulers, 297-298.
But this wasn’t done by them altruistically for the Jewish people. Per Guido Giacmomo Preparata, the point of it, which globohomo did elsewhere as well, was to generate on-going conflict which they could benefit from and control: “To isolate each conflict, the targeted territorial portion had to be severed from its adjacent district, and bled white by prolonged strife waged in the name of political, religious, or ethnic diversity. Thus the Anglo-Americans have always acted: in Europe by spinning everybody against Germany (1904-45); in the Near East, by jamming Israel in the heart of the Arab world (1917-present); in the Far East, by planting thorns in the side of China: Korea, Vietnam, and Taiwan (1950-present); in Central Asia by destabilizing the entire region intro tribal warfare with the help of Pakistan to prevent the Caspian seaboard from gravitating into the Russian sphere of influence.
Most importantly, in such trying games of conquest, results might never be expected to take shape quickly, but might take a matter of weeks, months or even decades. Imperial strategems are protracted affairs. The captains of world aggression measure their achievements, or failures, on a timescale whose unit is the generation.”
Quoting from Dennis Prager, in 1920, when Leon Trotsky was head of the Red Army, Moscow’s chief rabbi, Rabbi Jacob Mazeh, asked him to use the army to protect the Jews from pogromist attacks in which tens thousands of Jews were murdered. Trotsky is reported to have responded: “Why do you come to me? I am not a Jew,” to which Rabbi Mazeh answered: “That’s the tragedy. It’s the Trotskys who make revolutions, and it’s the Bronsteins who pay the price.”
i.e. just as the central bank owners deliberately brought about the rise of Nazism in order to brutally crush it to usher in modern globohomo, they may allow a redneck rebellion in order to crush it and lead to their desired dialectical synthesis. Interestingly, Ernst Junger understood this about Hitler, where he wrote as the war was ending: “In the evening, Hitler's death was announced on the radio, which is as mysterious as much that surrounds him. I was under the impression that this man, like Mussolini, had for a long time only been moved as a puppet by other hands, other forces.” Nothing in this reality happens in a vacuum or by chance; as FDR famously said, "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."
Thank you for the insightful and thought-provoking essay. I have a deep conviction that hypocrisy necessarily produces nasty second and third order effects, which is why I consider it inherently immoral/evil. Most people I discuss this with find it persuasive, but only to a point. I think at some level people don't want to let go of the efficient self-deception that the hypocrisy they allow themselves and others poses an existential threat to civilization if it crosses some decisive point. Everyone with a modicum of self-awareness and life experience knows Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's quote "The line separating good and evil runs not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either - but right through every human heart" touches upon a deep truth. There are a lot of ways to frame this, but my current favorite relates to two competing psychological theories regarding what drives us, the hierometer and sociometer theories. Are we driven to ascend in a zero-sum status hierarchy, or are we driven to belong? I think there is a distinct balance in every given person, because these are, to an extent, oppositional drives that we all experience. Emotions like jealousy make it impossible to optimize for getting along with everyone around you while simultaneously prioritizing getting ahead. Having a smaller community where you're sure you belong while operating in a larger society mercilessly striving to get ahead in seems to be a way of hacking this paradox, but living such a strategy isn't without cost. This only amplifies the jealousy and resentment of those you're getting ahead of, especially if you have the temerity to gloat about how thrilled you are to belong within your segregated community. While it is most tempting to believe if you are the beneficiary of such an arrangement, there is no way to hack this balance of striving and belonging without undoing the underlying fabric of the civilization we all share in. Hopefully this is a simple enough point that people can come to understand it en masse and we can avoid the terrible futures you describe.
This is excellent, nuanced, and as comprehensive an overview of this critically important issue as could realistically be done in a single post. Well done!
There is one thing that I question: whether Christianity really could have been intentionally engineered like a psyop against the Roman empire. I admit, when framed a certain way, it does appear to be the case. However, it ascribes to the Jewish elites of that era a godlike level of foresight and sophistication that seems too incredible to believe. That, in turn, leads me back to a question that no longer seems as absurd to me as it once did: what if the esoteric inner circle of ancient Jewry, the British royal family, the Chinese Communist Party, and the modern-day central bankster cabal are themselves merely the useful idiot junior partners of some superhuman dark spiritual power? The way this cabal so adroitly manipulated modern geopolitics to its advantage, expertly playing both sides of various conflicts, speaks to an intelligence and will that frankly seem to me to be beyond what even the smartest and most committed humans are capable of, on their own.